Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon

Descripción del Articulo

Indigenous organizations were born out of the demand that, to this day, remains the backbone of their agenda: to protect their lands and natural resources, as a guarantees for their subsistence. The state response was to create the figure of “native community”, that would become fragment swarths of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Balbuena Palacios, Patricia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/26563
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/26563
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Territorio
Territorio ancestral
Territorio integral
Autonomía
Gobiernos autónomos
Ley de comunidades nativas
Pueblos indígenas amazónicos
Territory
Ancestral territory
Integral territory
Autonomy
Autonomous governments
Law on native communities
Amazonian indigenous peoples
id REVPUCP_8efc8daf961348454a07f8ac7ce9de18
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/26563
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon
Tierra, territorio y autonomía: los gobiernos territoriales autónomos en la Amazonía Peruana
title Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon
spellingShingle Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon
Balbuena Palacios, Patricia
Territorio
Territorio ancestral
Territorio integral
Autonomía
Gobiernos autónomos
Ley de comunidades nativas
Pueblos indígenas amazónicos
Territory
Ancestral territory
Integral territory
Autonomy
Autonomous governments
Law on native communities
Amazonian indigenous peoples
title_short Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon
title_full Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon
title_fullStr Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon
title_full_unstemmed Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon
title_sort Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian Amazon
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Balbuena Palacios, Patricia
author Balbuena Palacios, Patricia
author_facet Balbuena Palacios, Patricia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Territorio
Territorio ancestral
Territorio integral
Autonomía
Gobiernos autónomos
Ley de comunidades nativas
Pueblos indígenas amazónicos
Territory
Ancestral territory
Integral territory
Autonomy
Autonomous governments
Law on native communities
Amazonian indigenous peoples
topic Territorio
Territorio ancestral
Territorio integral
Autonomía
Gobiernos autónomos
Ley de comunidades nativas
Pueblos indígenas amazónicos
Territory
Ancestral territory
Integral territory
Autonomy
Autonomous governments
Law on native communities
Amazonian indigenous peoples
description Indigenous organizations were born out of the demand that, to this day, remains the backbone of their agenda: to protect their lands and natural resources, as a guarantees for their subsistence. The state response was to create the figure of “native community”, that would become fragment swarths of lowlands indigenous people’s territories; a legal figure similar to the “peasant community” in the Andes. To establish native communities, the state concentrates the indigenous population in villages, breaking traditional patterns of settlement. However, all these changes were accepted by indigenous organizations in exchange for protection against waves of immigration and illegal activities such as unauthorized logging.This article aims to show how the state response, through the legal framework of Native Communities Laws of 1974 and 1978, is no longer sufficient to fulfill the needs of indigenous peoples to protect their lands and territories. The native community’s regulation does not fulfill the standards developed by the Constitutional Court and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, nor with the ILO Convention No 169. Illegal activities are growing in the Amazon, and conflicts due to territory overlaps are a permanent source of conflicts with formal or illegal third parties.In recent years, indigenous organizations have tried to recover the governance of their territories through two main strategies: i) titling as an indigenous people and no longer as communities; and ii) establishing autonomous governments on those territories. Currently, 7 indigenous peoples out of 51 have advanced in this pursuit. This process, led by the Wampis people, could be the beginning of a new stage in the relationship between the State and the traditional Amazonian inhabitants. The actors involved must urgently address the situation since what is at stake is the subsistence of indigenous peoples and the preservation of lowlands ecosystems and biodiversity. Meanwhile, illegal actors are taking advantage of these legal weaknesses to advance by leaps and bounds.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/26563
10.18800/dys.202202.003
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/26563
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/dys.202202.003
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/26563/24966
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho & Sociedad; Núm. 59 (2022): Ordenamiento Territorial y Urbano; 1-26
2521-599X
2079-3634
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900430476869632
spelling Land, territory, and autonomy: autonomous indigenous governments in the Peruvian AmazonTierra, territorio y autonomía: los gobiernos territoriales autónomos en la Amazonía PeruanaBalbuena Palacios, PatriciaTerritorioTerritorio ancestralTerritorio integralAutonomíaGobiernos autónomosLey de comunidades nativasPueblos indígenas amazónicosTerritoryAncestral territoryIntegral territoryAutonomyAutonomous governmentsLaw on native communitiesAmazonian indigenous peoplesIndigenous organizations were born out of the demand that, to this day, remains the backbone of their agenda: to protect their lands and natural resources, as a guarantees for their subsistence. The state response was to create the figure of “native community”, that would become fragment swarths of lowlands indigenous people’s territories; a legal figure similar to the “peasant community” in the Andes. To establish native communities, the state concentrates the indigenous population in villages, breaking traditional patterns of settlement. However, all these changes were accepted by indigenous organizations in exchange for protection against waves of immigration and illegal activities such as unauthorized logging.This article aims to show how the state response, through the legal framework of Native Communities Laws of 1974 and 1978, is no longer sufficient to fulfill the needs of indigenous peoples to protect their lands and territories. The native community’s regulation does not fulfill the standards developed by the Constitutional Court and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, nor with the ILO Convention No 169. Illegal activities are growing in the Amazon, and conflicts due to territory overlaps are a permanent source of conflicts with formal or illegal third parties.In recent years, indigenous organizations have tried to recover the governance of their territories through two main strategies: i) titling as an indigenous people and no longer as communities; and ii) establishing autonomous governments on those territories. Currently, 7 indigenous peoples out of 51 have advanced in this pursuit. This process, led by the Wampis people, could be the beginning of a new stage in the relationship between the State and the traditional Amazonian inhabitants. The actors involved must urgently address the situation since what is at stake is the subsistence of indigenous peoples and the preservation of lowlands ecosystems and biodiversity. Meanwhile, illegal actors are taking advantage of these legal weaknesses to advance by leaps and bounds.Las organizaciones indígenas nacieron con una demanda que hasta hoy sigue siendo la espina dorsal de su agenda: proteger sus tierras y recursos naturales como garantía para su subsistencia. La respuesta estatal fue la de crear la figura de comunidades nativas que pasarían a ser la concreción territorial fragmentada de cada pueblo indígena de la Amazonía; figura similar a las comunidades campesinas, pero estas tenían como antecedente las delimitaciones de los reductos coloniales. Para crear comunidades nativas, hubo que concentrar a la población indígena, rompiendo patrones de asentamientos tradicionales. No obstante, todo ello fue aceptado, a cambio de garantías frente a las olas de migración y actividades como tala ilegal.El propósito de este artículo es mostrar cómo la respuesta estatal, a través del marco normativo que data de la Ley de Comunidades Nativas de 1974 y 1978, ya no es suficiente para cumplir el anhelo de los pueblos indígenas para proteger sus tierras y territorios. No se ha cumplido con la tarea de alinear la norma nacional al Convenio 169° de la OIT y tampoco a los estándares desarrollados por la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Las actividades ilegales crecen en la Amazonía, y los conflictos por superposiciones son fuente permanente de conflictos con terceros formales o ilegales. Ante esto, la respuesta de las organizaciones indígenas es recuperar la gobernanza de sus territorios, a través de dos estrategias: i) la titulación como pueblo indígena y ya no como comunidades; y ii) sobre esos territorios, la constitución de gobiernos territoriales autónomos. A la fecha, son 7 pueblos de los 5 los que han avanzado en ese proceso. El mismo es liderado por el pueblo Wampis y puede ser el inicio de una nueva etapa en la relación entre el Estado y los pueblos indígenas amazónicos, la cual no se puede ignorar, sino que debe ser abordada con carácter de urgencia, ya que está en juego no solo la subsistencia de los pueblos indígenas, sino también la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas de nuestra Amazonía, frente a los actores ilegales que aprovechan estas fragilidades para avanzar a pasos agigantados.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2022-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/2656310.18800/dys.202202.003Derecho & Sociedad; Núm. 59 (2022): Ordenamiento Territorial y Urbano; 1-262521-599X2079-3634reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/26563/24966https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/265632024-02-12T16:00:37Z
score 13.325744
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).