Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question

Descripción del Articulo

The Peruvian legal system includes two autonomous institutions: the National Election Jury and the Constitutional Court. However, the Act 28642, approved by the Peruvian Parliament and supported by the electoral entity, prevents constitutional processes from being initiated against decisions made by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Donayre Montesinos, Christian
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2006
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3038
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3038
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Constitutionally Autonomous Agencies
Check and Balances
Peruvian National Election Jury
Fundamental Rights
Constitutional Rule of Law
Electoral Power
Organismos Constitucionalmente Autónomos
Equilibrio de Poderes
Derechos Fundamentales
Estado Constitucional de Derecho
Poder Electoral
Jurado Nacional de Elecciones
id REVPUCP_8c04eaf144c45510cc350d3714de4f37
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3038
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in QuestionEntre la autonomía y la autarquía del Jurado Nacional de Elecciones: la irrevisibilidad de sus decisiones en sede jurisdiccional en cuestiónDonayre Montesinos, ChristianConstitutionally Autonomous AgenciesCheck and BalancesPeruvian National Election JuryFundamental RightsConstitutional Rule of LawElectoral PowerOrganismos Constitucionalmente AutónomosEquilibrio de PoderesDerechos FundamentalesEstado Constitucional de DerechoPoder ElectoralJurado Nacional de EleccionesThe Peruvian legal system includes two autonomous institutions: the National Election Jury and the Constitutional Court. However, the Act 28642, approved by the Peruvian Parliament and supported by the electoral entity, prevents constitutional processes from being initiated against decisions made by the latter. The author suggests that this situation could lead to scenarios of autarchy, where the JNE acts without supervision, what affects the balance between powers. In this framework, the author proposes analyzing the problem from the general theory of constitutionally autonomous agencies. This paper aims to establish that although agencies are autonomous, they cannot remain completely disconnected from each other. Therefore, mechanisms must be created to allow for a relationship between them while avoiding autarkic scenarios without control.El Jurado Nacional de Elecciones (JNE) y el Tribunal Constitucional son dos instituciones autónomas en el ordenamiento jurídico peruano. No obstante, la Ley 28642, aprobada por el Parlamento peruano y respaldada por el órgano electoral, establece que no procederán los procesos constitucionales sobre las decisiones de este último. El autor indica que esta situación podría generar escenarios de autarquía donde el JNE actúa sin supervisión, lo que afecta el equilibrio entre poderes. En ese marco, el autor propone un análisis de esta problemática a partir de una perspectiva diferente, esto es, desde la teoría general de los organismos constitucionalmente autónomos. De acuerdo a este planteamiento, el presente trabajo busca establecer que, aunque los organismos sean autónomos, no pueden permanecer completamente desconectados entre sí. Esto implica la necesidad de crear mecanismos que permitan la relación entre ellos y, a su vez, eviten panoramas autárquicos libres de control.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2006-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3038Derecho PUCP; No. 59 (2006): The 2006 Electoral Process and its Implications for Democratic Governance in Peru; 111-137Derecho PUCP; Núm. 59 (2006): El Proceso Electoral 2006 y sus Implicancias para la Gobernabilidad Democrática en el Perú; 111-137Derecho PUCP; n. 59 (2006): El Proceso Electoral 2006 y sus Implicancias para la Gobernabilidad Democrática en el Perú; 111-1372305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3038/2885Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30382025-01-14T23:08:32Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
Entre la autonomía y la autarquía del Jurado Nacional de Elecciones: la irrevisibilidad de sus decisiones en sede jurisdiccional en cuestión
title Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
spellingShingle Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
Donayre Montesinos, Christian
Constitutionally Autonomous Agencies
Check and Balances
Peruvian National Election Jury
Fundamental Rights
Constitutional Rule of Law
Electoral Power
Organismos Constitucionalmente Autónomos
Equilibrio de Poderes
Derechos Fundamentales
Estado Constitucional de Derecho
Poder Electoral
Jurado Nacional de Elecciones
title_short Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
title_full Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
title_fullStr Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
title_full_unstemmed Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
title_sort Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Donayre Montesinos, Christian
author Donayre Montesinos, Christian
author_facet Donayre Montesinos, Christian
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Constitutionally Autonomous Agencies
Check and Balances
Peruvian National Election Jury
Fundamental Rights
Constitutional Rule of Law
Electoral Power
Organismos Constitucionalmente Autónomos
Equilibrio de Poderes
Derechos Fundamentales
Estado Constitucional de Derecho
Poder Electoral
Jurado Nacional de Elecciones
topic Constitutionally Autonomous Agencies
Check and Balances
Peruvian National Election Jury
Fundamental Rights
Constitutional Rule of Law
Electoral Power
Organismos Constitucionalmente Autónomos
Equilibrio de Poderes
Derechos Fundamentales
Estado Constitucional de Derecho
Poder Electoral
Jurado Nacional de Elecciones
description The Peruvian legal system includes two autonomous institutions: the National Election Jury and the Constitutional Court. However, the Act 28642, approved by the Peruvian Parliament and supported by the electoral entity, prevents constitutional processes from being initiated against decisions made by the latter. The author suggests that this situation could lead to scenarios of autarchy, where the JNE acts without supervision, what affects the balance between powers. In this framework, the author proposes analyzing the problem from the general theory of constitutionally autonomous agencies. This paper aims to establish that although agencies are autonomous, they cannot remain completely disconnected from each other. Therefore, mechanisms must be created to allow for a relationship between them while avoiding autarkic scenarios without control.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3038
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3038
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3038/2885
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho PUCP; No. 59 (2006): The 2006 Electoral Process and its Implications for Democratic Governance in Peru; 111-137
Derecho PUCP; Núm. 59 (2006): El Proceso Electoral 2006 y sus Implicancias para la Gobernabilidad Democrática en el Perú; 111-137
Derecho PUCP; n. 59 (2006): El Proceso Electoral 2006 y sus Implicancias para la Gobernabilidad Democrática en el Perú; 111-137
2305-2546
0251-3420
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1845975187531497472
score 13.035174
Between the Autonomy and the Autarchy of the National Jury of Elections: The Irreversibility of its Decisions in the Jurisdictional Venue in Question
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares