Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample
Descripción del Articulo
The present study summarizes the validity of a multi-method integrity test developed to measure integrity and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) in personnel selection of a Peruvian sample. This instrument has been thoroughly studied in other cultural contexts, establishing its validity in predi...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2017 |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/16104 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16104 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Counterproductive work behaviors integrity personnel selection measurement. conductas contraproducentes en el trabajo integridad selección de personal medición validez. comportamento contraproducente no trabalho integridade seleção de pessoal medição validade. |
| id |
REVPUCP_89a6be607b4b1b0aa9bc6d194fa28609 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaspuc:article/16104 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample Estudio de validación de una prueba de integridad multimétodo en una muestra peruana Estudo de validação de teste multi-método do integridade das amostra peruana |
| title |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample |
| spellingShingle |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample Blumen, Sheyla Counterproductive work behaviors integrity personnel selection measurement. conductas contraproducentes en el trabajo integridad selección de personal medición validez. comportamento contraproducente no trabalho integridade seleção de pessoal medição validade. |
| title_short |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample |
| title_full |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample |
| title_fullStr |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample |
| title_sort |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Blumen, Sheyla Bayona, Hugo Givoli, Simon Pecker, Gabriela Fine, Saul |
| author |
Blumen, Sheyla |
| author_facet |
Blumen, Sheyla Bayona, Hugo Givoli, Simon Pecker, Gabriela Fine, Saul |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Bayona, Hugo Givoli, Simon Pecker, Gabriela Fine, Saul |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Counterproductive work behaviors integrity personnel selection measurement. conductas contraproducentes en el trabajo integridad selección de personal medición validez. comportamento contraproducente no trabalho integridade seleção de pessoal medição validade. |
| topic |
Counterproductive work behaviors integrity personnel selection measurement. conductas contraproducentes en el trabajo integridad selección de personal medición validez. comportamento contraproducente no trabalho integridade seleção de pessoal medição validade. |
| description |
The present study summarizes the validity of a multi-method integrity test developed to measure integrity and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) in personnel selection of a Peruvian sample. This instrument has been thoroughly studied in other cultural contexts, establishing its validity in predicting counter-productive behaviors. In order to study external validity, two criteria were used: (a) The Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist (CWB-C) and (b) a supervisor evaluation questionnaire. The criterion validity of the Peruvian Spanish version was studied with a sample of 194 employed students, 86 male (44.3%) and 108 (55.7%) female. Participants were recruited from a large private Peruvian university. The instrument’s overall score correlated with self-reported CWB (r= -.62, p <.01). Regarding the other criterion, only the Ethical Dilemmas sub-scale showed a significant correlation with supervisor-rated CWB (r=.18, p< .05). Female participants reported higher scores than male participants on the Attitudes (U (193) = 3842.5, p<.05), Ethical Dilemmas (U (193) = 3619.5, p<.05), and Past Behaviors (U (193) = 3463.5, p<.01) dimensions of the integrity test (r=.15-.22), as well as on the overall score (U (193) = 3395.5, p<.01). Results support the validity of the multi-method integrity measure to predict counterproductive work behaviors, without adverse gender impact. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-14 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16104 10.18800/psico.201701.011 |
| url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16104 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.18800/psico.201701.011 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16104/16525 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Psicología; Vol. 35 Núm. 1 (2017); 347-370 2223-3733 0254-9247 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
| instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| instacron_str |
PUCP |
| institution |
PUCP |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1840900939839438848 |
| spelling |
Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sampleEstudio de validación de una prueba de integridad multimétodo en una muestra peruanaEstudo de validação de teste multi-método do integridade das amostra peruanaBlumen, SheylaBayona, HugoGivoli, SimonPecker, GabrielaFine, SaulCounterproductive work behaviorsintegritypersonnel selectionmeasurement.conductas contraproducentes en el trabajointegridadselección de personalmediciónvalidez.comportamento contraproducente no trabalhointegridadeseleção de pessoalmediçãovalidade.The present study summarizes the validity of a multi-method integrity test developed to measure integrity and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) in personnel selection of a Peruvian sample. This instrument has been thoroughly studied in other cultural contexts, establishing its validity in predicting counter-productive behaviors. In order to study external validity, two criteria were used: (a) The Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist (CWB-C) and (b) a supervisor evaluation questionnaire. The criterion validity of the Peruvian Spanish version was studied with a sample of 194 employed students, 86 male (44.3%) and 108 (55.7%) female. Participants were recruited from a large private Peruvian university. The instrument’s overall score correlated with self-reported CWB (r= -.62, p <.01). Regarding the other criterion, only the Ethical Dilemmas sub-scale showed a significant correlation with supervisor-rated CWB (r=.18, p< .05). Female participants reported higher scores than male participants on the Attitudes (U (193) = 3842.5, p<.05), Ethical Dilemmas (U (193) = 3619.5, p<.05), and Past Behaviors (U (193) = 3463.5, p<.01) dimensions of the integrity test (r=.15-.22), as well as on the overall score (U (193) = 3395.5, p<.01). Results support the validity of the multi-method integrity measure to predict counterproductive work behaviors, without adverse gender impact.El presente estudio evaluó la validez de una prueba de integridad multimétodo desarrollada para medir la integridad y las conductas contraproducentes en el trabajo (CWB) en la selec ción de personal en una muestra peruana. La prueba ha sido estudiada en otros contextos culturales, habiéndose probado su validez en la predicción de conductas contraproducentes (Fine & Pecker, 2015). Para la validez externa, se usaron dos criterios: (a) La lista de cotejo de conductas contraproducentes en el trabajo/The Counterproductive Work Behavior Chec klist (CWB-C), y (b) un cuestionario de evaluación dirigido a los supervisores. Para la validez de criterio, según el español que se habla en el Perú, se consideró una muestra de 194 estudiantes que trabajan, 86 hombres (44.3%) y 108 (55.7%) mujeres, quienes fueron reclutados de una universidad privada peruana. El puntaje total de la prueba correlacionó significativamente con el autorreporte de CWB (r=-.62, p<.01). En el segundo criterio solo la dimensión de Dilemas éticos mostró una correlación significativa con la evaluación del supervisor (r=.18, p<.05). Las participantes mujeres reportaron puntajes más altos que los varones para las dimensiones de Actitudes (U (193) = 3842.5, p<.05), Dilemas Éticos (U (193) = 3619.5, p<.05) y Comportamiento Pasado (U (193)= 3463.5, p<.01) de la prueba de integridad (r=.15-.22), así como en el puntaje final (U (193) = 3395.5, p<.01). Los resul tados del presente estudio apoyan la validez de la prueba de integridad multi-método para predecir las conductas contraproducentes en el trabajo, sin un impacto adverso de género.Este estudo avaliou a validade de um teste multi-método desenvolvido para medir a inte gridade e comportamentos contraproducentes no trabalho (CWB) na seleção de pessoal no Peru. Este teste tem sido estudado extensivamente em outros contextos culturais e foi encon trado válida e eficaz na predição de comportamentos contraproducentes (Fine & Pecker, 2015). Para validade externa, foram utilizados dois critérios. (a) The Counterproductive Behavior Checklist (CWB-C), e (b) um questionário de avaliação dirigido a supervisores. Para estudar a validade de critério da versão em espanhol peruana do teste, uma amostra de 194 estudantes que trabalham foi usado, 86 homens (44,3%) e 108 (55,7%) mulheres, recrutados a partir de uma grande universidade privada no Peru. A pontuação total do teste correlação significativa com CWB auto-reportado (r = -. 62, p <0,01). Sobre o segundo critério, apenas a dimensão de dilemas éticos do teste mostrou uma correlação significa tiva com a avaliação do supervisor (r = 0,18, p <0,05). Mulheres participantes relataram uma maior pontuação que os homens para as dimensões de Atitudes (U (193) = 3842.5, p<.05), Dilemas Éticos (U (193) = 3619.5, p<.05), e Comportamento passado (U (193)= 3463.5, p<.01) do teste de integridade (r = 0,15-0,22). Os resultados deste estudo reforçam a validade de teste multi-método do integridade de prever comportamentos de trabalho contraproducentes, sem um impacto adverso do género.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2017-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/1610410.18800/psico.201701.011Revista de Psicología; Vol. 35 Núm. 1 (2017); 347-3702223-37330254-9247reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16104/16525info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/161042021-07-10T19:14:32Z |
| score |
13.871978 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
