Round table discussion: Could animals be considered as legal subjects? An analysis of the “Ley de protección y bienestar animal” and the last judgment of the Constitutional Court that declares its exceptions as constitutional

• Autores: Franciskovic Ingunza, Beatriz, Varsi Rospigliosi, Enrique, Foy Valencia, Pierre
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2020
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22726
• Enlace del recurso: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22726
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Derecho Civil; Derecho Constitucional; Derecho Animal; Tribunal Constitucional del Perú; Ley 30407; Protección y bienestar animal; Animales como sujeto de derecho; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; Animal Law; Constitutional Court; Law 30407; Animal protection and welfare; Animals as subjects of law

The current round table gathers three renowned specialists: Beatriz Franciskovic, from the perspective of Constitutional Law; Enrique Varsi, from the perspective of Civil law; and Pierre Foy Valencia, from the perspective of Animal Law, in order to analyze the current state of animals in the legal system, considering the Law 30407 – Ley de Protección y Bienestar Animal, and the last judgment of the Constitutional Court about bullfights and cockfights. Thus, the guests address the implication of considering animals as a subject of law, and the limitation of legal system to establish and the adequate and effective regime in favor of animals.