The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
Descripción del Articulo
Scholarly work that examines the production of ethnoracial categories has more closely examined the role of nation-states, social movements, and transnational trends. This focus has shifted attention away from the internal institutional processes that influence the production of ethnoracial categori...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/24570 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Census-takers Ethnoracial categories Mestizos Peru Self-identification Empadronadores Categorías étnico-raciales Perú Autoidentificación |
id |
REVPUCP_7d01c85abca0dbe2c3c956db8c1db475 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaspuc:article/24570 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian censusCoproduciendo Categorías étnico-raciales: empadronadores en el Censo Nacional de Perú 2017Gonzales Huaman, MeylinMoraes Silva, GraziellaSulmont, DavidCensus-takersEthnoracial categoriesMestizosPeruSelf-identificationEmpadronadoresCategorías étnico-racialesMestizosPerúAutoidentificaciónScholarly work that examines the production of ethnoracial categories has more closely examined the role of nation-states, social movements, and transnational trends. This focus has shifted attention away from the internal institutional processes that influence the production of ethnoracial categories. In particular, the role of the census-takers as key actors in these institutional processes has been underexamined. In this study, we draw from fifty-four semi-structured interviews with census-takers who participated in the 2017 Peruvian National Census to argue that census-takers can be considered street-level bureaucrats because of the influence they exercise in the production of ethnoracial categories. In a context where ethnoracial categories are contested, participants in our study drew from their own understandings of the ethnoracial question which ultimately –albeit inadvertently– influenced the self-identification of household members and, to a greater extent, increased the probability that household members self-identify as mestizo. Although census-takers play a temporary role, they are still important actors who can be considered street-level bureaucrats in the production of ethnoracial categories in contexts where these categories are continuous subjects of debate and contestation.La creciente literatura que analiza la producción de categorías étnico-raciales se ha centrado principalmente en el papel de los estados-nación, los movimientos sociales y las tendencias transnacionales. Los debates institucionales internos que influyen en estos procesos han recibido una atención limitada, y el papel de los empadronadores en particular permanece en gran parte inexplorado. Basado en las entrevistas a profundidad a cincuenta y cuatro empadronadores en el Censo Nacional de Perú de 2017, este documento sostiene que los empadronadores son actores influyentes en la producción de categorías étnico-raciales y pueden ser considerados como burócratas a nivel de calle. En nuestro estudio, las interpretaciones de los empadronadores sobre la pregunta étnico-racial y las categorías enfatizaron dimensiones de raza y etnicidad que aumentaron la probabilidad de que los residentes se identificaran como mestizos. Estos hallazgos sugieren que, a pesar de su papel temporal, los empadronadores son actores importantes en la producción de categorías étnico-raciales en sociedades en las que estas son cuestionadas.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2021-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/2457010.18800/debatesensociologia.202102.002Debates en Sociología; Núm. 53 (2021): Varia (Multidisciplinario); 41-752304-42840254-9220reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570/23313http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/245702023-07-24T17:18:07Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census Coproduciendo Categorías étnico-raciales: empadronadores en el Censo Nacional de Perú 2017 |
title |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census |
spellingShingle |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census Gonzales Huaman, Meylin Census-takers Ethnoracial categories Mestizos Peru Self-identification Empadronadores Categorías étnico-raciales Mestizos Perú Autoidentificación |
title_short |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census |
title_full |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census |
title_fullStr |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census |
title_full_unstemmed |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census |
title_sort |
The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gonzales Huaman, Meylin Moraes Silva, Graziella Sulmont, David |
author |
Gonzales Huaman, Meylin |
author_facet |
Gonzales Huaman, Meylin Moraes Silva, Graziella Sulmont, David |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moraes Silva, Graziella Sulmont, David |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Census-takers Ethnoracial categories Mestizos Peru Self-identification Empadronadores Categorías étnico-raciales Mestizos Perú Autoidentificación |
topic |
Census-takers Ethnoracial categories Mestizos Peru Self-identification Empadronadores Categorías étnico-raciales Mestizos Perú Autoidentificación |
description |
Scholarly work that examines the production of ethnoracial categories has more closely examined the role of nation-states, social movements, and transnational trends. This focus has shifted attention away from the internal institutional processes that influence the production of ethnoracial categories. In particular, the role of the census-takers as key actors in these institutional processes has been underexamined. In this study, we draw from fifty-four semi-structured interviews with census-takers who participated in the 2017 Peruvian National Census to argue that census-takers can be considered street-level bureaucrats because of the influence they exercise in the production of ethnoracial categories. In a context where ethnoracial categories are contested, participants in our study drew from their own understandings of the ethnoracial question which ultimately –albeit inadvertently– influenced the self-identification of household members and, to a greater extent, increased the probability that household members self-identify as mestizo. Although census-takers play a temporary role, they are still important actors who can be considered street-level bureaucrats in the production of ethnoracial categories in contexts where these categories are continuous subjects of debate and contestation. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570 10.18800/debatesensociologia.202102.002 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18800/debatesensociologia.202102.002 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570/23313 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Debates en Sociología; Núm. 53 (2021): Varia (Multidisciplinario); 41-75 2304-4284 0254-9220 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1836736776397389824 |
score |
13.952963 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).