The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census

Descripción del Articulo

Scholarly work that examines the production of ethnoracial categories has more closely examined the role of nation-states, social movements, and transnational trends. This focus has shifted attention away from the internal institutional processes that influence the production of ethnoracial categori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gonzales Huaman, Meylin, Moraes Silva, Graziella, Sulmont, David
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/24570
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Census-takers
Ethnoracial categories
Mestizos
Peru
Self-identification
Empadronadores
Categorías étnico-raciales
Perú
Autoidentificación
id REVPUCP_7d01c85abca0dbe2c3c956db8c1db475
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/24570
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian censusCoproduciendo Categorías étnico-raciales: empadronadores en el Censo Nacional de Perú 2017Gonzales Huaman, MeylinMoraes Silva, GraziellaSulmont, DavidCensus-takersEthnoracial categoriesMestizosPeruSelf-identificationEmpadronadoresCategorías étnico-racialesMestizosPerúAutoidentificaciónScholarly work that examines the production of ethnoracial categories has more closely examined the role of nation-states, social movements, and transnational trends. This focus has shifted attention away from the internal institutional processes that influence the production of ethnoracial categories. In particular, the role of the census-takers as key actors in these institutional processes has been underexamined. In this study, we draw from fifty-four semi-structured interviews with census-takers who participated in the 2017 Peruvian National Census to argue that census-takers can be considered street-level bureaucrats because of the influence they exercise in the production of ethnoracial categories. In a context where ethnoracial categories are contested, participants in our study drew from their own understandings of the ethnoracial question which ultimately –albeit inadvertently– influenced the self-identification of household members and, to a greater extent, increased the probability that household members self-identify as mestizo. Although census-takers play a temporary role, they are still important actors who can be considered street-level bureaucrats in the production of ethnoracial categories in contexts where these categories are continuous subjects of debate and contestation.La creciente literatura que analiza la producción de categorías étnico-raciales se ha centrado principalmente en el papel de los estados-nación, los movimientos sociales y las tendencias transnacionales. Los debates institucionales internos que influyen en estos procesos han recibido una atención limitada, y el papel de los empadronadores en particular permanece en gran parte inexplorado. Basado en las entrevistas a profundidad a cincuenta y cuatro empadronadores en el Censo Nacional de Perú de 2017, este documento sostiene que los empadronadores son actores influyentes en la producción de categorías étnico-raciales y pueden ser considerados como burócratas a nivel de calle. En nuestro estudio, las interpretaciones de los empadronadores sobre la pregunta étnico-racial y las categorías enfatizaron dimensiones de raza y etnicidad que aumentaron la probabilidad de que los residentes se identificaran como mestizos. Estos hallazgos sugieren que, a pesar de su papel temporal, los empadronadores son actores importantes en la producción de categorías étnico-raciales en sociedades en las que estas son cuestionadas.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2021-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/2457010.18800/debatesensociologia.202102.002Debates en Sociología; Núm. 53 (2021): Varia (Multidisciplinario); 41-752304-42840254-9220reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570/23313http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/245702023-07-24T17:18:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
Coproduciendo Categorías étnico-raciales: empadronadores en el Censo Nacional de Perú 2017
title The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
spellingShingle The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
Gonzales Huaman, Meylin
Census-takers
Ethnoracial categories
Mestizos
Peru
Self-identification
Empadronadores
Categorías étnico-raciales
Mestizos
Perú
Autoidentificación
title_short The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
title_full The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
title_fullStr The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
title_full_unstemmed The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
title_sort The co-production of ethnoracial categories: Census-takers as street-level bureaucrats in the 2017 Peruvian census
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gonzales Huaman, Meylin
Moraes Silva, Graziella
Sulmont, David
author Gonzales Huaman, Meylin
author_facet Gonzales Huaman, Meylin
Moraes Silva, Graziella
Sulmont, David
author_role author
author2 Moraes Silva, Graziella
Sulmont, David
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Census-takers
Ethnoracial categories
Mestizos
Peru
Self-identification
Empadronadores
Categorías étnico-raciales
Mestizos
Perú
Autoidentificación
topic Census-takers
Ethnoracial categories
Mestizos
Peru
Self-identification
Empadronadores
Categorías étnico-raciales
Mestizos
Perú
Autoidentificación
description Scholarly work that examines the production of ethnoracial categories has more closely examined the role of nation-states, social movements, and transnational trends. This focus has shifted attention away from the internal institutional processes that influence the production of ethnoracial categories. In particular, the role of the census-takers as key actors in these institutional processes has been underexamined. In this study, we draw from fifty-four semi-structured interviews with census-takers who participated in the 2017 Peruvian National Census to argue that census-takers can be considered street-level bureaucrats because of the influence they exercise in the production of ethnoracial categories. In a context where ethnoracial categories are contested, participants in our study drew from their own understandings of the ethnoracial question which ultimately –albeit inadvertently– influenced the self-identification of household members and, to a greater extent, increased the probability that household members self-identify as mestizo. Although census-takers play a temporary role, they are still important actors who can be considered street-level bureaucrats in the production of ethnoracial categories in contexts where these categories are continuous subjects of debate and contestation.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570
10.18800/debatesensociologia.202102.002
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/debatesensociologia.202102.002
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24570/23313
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Debates en Sociología; Núm. 53 (2021): Varia (Multidisciplinario); 41-75
2304-4284
0254-9220
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1836736776397389824
score 13.952963
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).