On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract

Descripción del Articulo

The study addresses the way, according to the author, in which must be resolved the problem of the concurrence of termination events in an administrative contract. It is common that parties attribute non-compliances to each other or the coexistence of termination events with different effects each o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: García-Trevijano Garnica, Ernesto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14403
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14403
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Concurrence
Termination
Extinction
Contract
Priority
Concurrencia
Resolución
Extinción
Contrato
Prioridad
id REVPUCP_5e701a543db0647e6c7bf010ca30d833
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14403
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative ContractSobre la Concurrencia de Causas de Resolución en un Mismo Contrato AdministrativoGarcía-Trevijano Garnica, ErnestoConcurrenceTerminationExtinctionContractPriorityConcurrenciaResoluciónExtinciónContratoPrioridadThe study addresses the way, according to the author, in which must be resolved the problem of the concurrence of termination events in an administrative contract. It is common that parties attribute non-compliances to each other or the coexistence of termination events with different effects each of them. In these situations, the termination event which must be applied as a matter of priority with its corresponding associated effects must be determined. In this context, it should be pointed out the doctrine of the Spanish Council of the State according to which the termination event occurred before in time is applicable as a priority. However, the author considers that should be taken into account the priority in time regarding the invocation of the termination event («activación») rather than its appearance («aparición»). Thus, the general rule is that termination events may be used by the party of the contract which has not caused them. However, the aforementioned rule does not entail that the party which may invoke a termination event, actually does so (la active), even though the presence of a material circumstance that justifies the existence of the termination event.On this basis, the author concludes that it is the priority in time of the invocation of the termination event [«activación»] (and not of its mere appearance) [y no de la simple «aparición»] which determines the termination event applicable as a priority when several termination events concur.El estudio aborda la forma en la que, a juicio del autor, hay que resolver el problema de laconcurrencia de causas de resolución sobre un mismo contrato administrativo. Es bastante habitual que las partes se imputen incumplimientos recíprocos, o que coexistan causas de resolución del contrato con efectos distintos cada una de ellas. En tales situaciones, hay que determinar la causa de resolución que debe aplicarse de manera prioritaria, con sus efectos anejos.En este contexto, se alude a la doctrina del Consejo de Estado español, relativa a considerar de aplicación prioritaria la causa de resolución que aparezca antes en el tiempo. Ahora bien, el autor considera que debe atenderse a la prioridad cronológica, no en la «aparición» de la causa de resolución, sino en su «activación». La regla general es que las causas de resolución sean de utilización potestativa por la parte en el contrato que no las provocó; ello se traduce en que aun cuando exista la circunstancia material que justifica la existencia de la causa de resolución, sin embargo ello no significa que quien puede hacerla valer efectivamente la ponga en funcionamiento (la active). Concluye por ello el autor que es la prioridad en el tiempo de la«activación» (y no de la simple «aparición») la que determina la causa de resolución del contratoque deberá aplicarse prioritariamente cuando concurran varias causas de resolución.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14403Derecho & Sociedad; No. 44 (2015); 211-220Derecho & Sociedad; Núm. 44 (2015); 211-2202521-599X2079-3634reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14403/15018Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho & Sociedadhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/144032018-03-21T20:16:48Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract
Sobre la Concurrencia de Causas de Resolución en un Mismo Contrato Administrativo
title On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract
spellingShingle On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract
García-Trevijano Garnica, Ernesto
Concurrence
Termination
Extinction
Contract
Priority
Concurrencia
Resolución
Extinción
Contrato
Prioridad
title_short On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract
title_full On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract
title_fullStr On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract
title_full_unstemmed On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract
title_sort On the Concurrence of Termination events in the Same Administrative Contract
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv García-Trevijano Garnica, Ernesto
author García-Trevijano Garnica, Ernesto
author_facet García-Trevijano Garnica, Ernesto
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Concurrence
Termination
Extinction
Contract
Priority
Concurrencia
Resolución
Extinción
Contrato
Prioridad
topic Concurrence
Termination
Extinction
Contract
Priority
Concurrencia
Resolución
Extinción
Contrato
Prioridad
description The study addresses the way, according to the author, in which must be resolved the problem of the concurrence of termination events in an administrative contract. It is common that parties attribute non-compliances to each other or the coexistence of termination events with different effects each of them. In these situations, the termination event which must be applied as a matter of priority with its corresponding associated effects must be determined. In this context, it should be pointed out the doctrine of the Spanish Council of the State according to which the termination event occurred before in time is applicable as a priority. However, the author considers that should be taken into account the priority in time regarding the invocation of the termination event («activación») rather than its appearance («aparición»). Thus, the general rule is that termination events may be used by the party of the contract which has not caused them. However, the aforementioned rule does not entail that the party which may invoke a termination event, actually does so (la active), even though the presence of a material circumstance that justifies the existence of the termination event.On this basis, the author concludes that it is the priority in time of the invocation of the termination event [«activación»] (and not of its mere appearance) [y no de la simple «aparición»] which determines the termination event applicable as a priority when several termination events concur.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14403
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14403
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14403/15018
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho & Sociedad
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho & Sociedad
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho & Sociedad; No. 44 (2015); 211-220
Derecho & Sociedad; Núm. 44 (2015); 211-220
2521-599X
2079-3634
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1847243723474206720
score 12.888917
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).