Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law
Descripción del Articulo
The Brazilian Consumer Protection and Defense Act has granted special protection to several categories. In doing so it has in fact recognized the stricto sensu, the bystander, and the collectively protected categories, further associating prospective protection to all those who may be reached by an...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19961 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19961 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | consumer collectives maximalism finalism overarching theory consumidor ente colectivo maximalismo finalismo teoría englobante |
id |
REVPUCP_5b6a7358836ebe5471bfc97fa2c673fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19961 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian LawAportes para la comprensión de la arquitectura jurídica de la relación de consumo en el derecho brasileroCatalan, MarcosMalheiros da Cunha Frota, Pabloconsumercollectivesmaximalismfinalismoverarching theoryconsumidorente colectivomaximalismofinalismoteoría englobanteThe Brazilian Consumer Protection and Defense Act has granted special protection to several categories. In doing so it has in fact recognized the stricto sensu, the bystander, and the collectively protected categories, further associating prospective protection to all those who may be reached by any number of commerce practices. It has also not waived rights of collective bargaining for consumer demands as fundamental rights. This article seeks to explore whether the current theoretical background that aims to categorize collectives as consumers is enough to deal with the issues within the field. Our hypothesis is that the current background is not sufficient given the need to overcome, through a complex hermeneutic approach, the answers proposed by the dogmatic perspective within consumer studies. Our approach seeks to critically analyze the juridical literature written on the topic in Brazil, mapping decisions written during the almost 30 years of effectivity of the Brazilian Consumer Protection and Defense Act, reviewing each of the current theories on the issue of consumer protection, and finally proposing an overarching theory of consumer protection.El Código de Defesa del Consumidor brasileño optó por catalogar como vulnerables a diversas figuras. Al hacerlo, delineó las figuras del consumidor stricto sensu, del bystander, de las colectividades destinatarias de protección; asimismo, buscó proteger inclusive a aquellos que se vean afectados de algún modo por una diversidad de prácticas comerciales. Por otra parte, no privó a los entes colectivos de la posibilidad de atraer, para sí, tutelas que densifiquen el derecho fundamental al consumo. Este artículo se propone explorar la suficiencia de las matrices teóricas creadas para categorizar a los entes colectivos como consumidores. Se plantea la hipótesis de que dichas matrices son insuficientes y se defiende la consecuente necesidad de agregar complejidad hermenéutica a las respuestas dadas por la dogmática del derecho del consumidor. Teniendo como método el análisis crítico de la literatura jurídica escrita sobre el tema en el Brasil y el mapeo de decisiones proferidas a lo largo de casi 30 años de vigencia del Código de Defensa del Consumidor, se revisa cada una de las teorías sobre el asunto para, finalmente, sugerir el uso de la teoría englobante.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2018-05-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19961Derecho PUCP; No. 80 (2018): Civil Law; 391-423Derecho PUCP; Núm. 80 (2018): Derecho Civil; 391-423Derecho PUCP; n. 80 (2018): Direito Civil; 391-4232305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19961/19980Derechos de autor 2018 Derecho PUCPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/199612020-02-03T13:55:55Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law Aportes para la comprensión de la arquitectura jurídica de la relación de consumo en el derecho brasilero |
title |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law |
spellingShingle |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law Catalan, Marcos consumer collectives maximalism finalism overarching theory consumidor ente colectivo maximalismo finalismo teoría englobante |
title_short |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law |
title_full |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law |
title_fullStr |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law |
title_sort |
Towards an Understanding of the Juridical Architecture of the Consumer Relation in Brazilian Law |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Catalan, Marcos Malheiros da Cunha Frota, Pablo |
author |
Catalan, Marcos |
author_facet |
Catalan, Marcos Malheiros da Cunha Frota, Pablo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Malheiros da Cunha Frota, Pablo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
consumer collectives maximalism finalism overarching theory consumidor ente colectivo maximalismo finalismo teoría englobante |
topic |
consumer collectives maximalism finalism overarching theory consumidor ente colectivo maximalismo finalismo teoría englobante |
description |
The Brazilian Consumer Protection and Defense Act has granted special protection to several categories. In doing so it has in fact recognized the stricto sensu, the bystander, and the collectively protected categories, further associating prospective protection to all those who may be reached by any number of commerce practices. It has also not waived rights of collective bargaining for consumer demands as fundamental rights. This article seeks to explore whether the current theoretical background that aims to categorize collectives as consumers is enough to deal with the issues within the field. Our hypothesis is that the current background is not sufficient given the need to overcome, through a complex hermeneutic approach, the answers proposed by the dogmatic perspective within consumer studies. Our approach seeks to critically analyze the juridical literature written on the topic in Brazil, mapping decisions written during the almost 30 years of effectivity of the Brazilian Consumer Protection and Defense Act, reviewing each of the current theories on the issue of consumer protection, and finally proposing an overarching theory of consumer protection. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-29 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19961 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19961 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19961/19980 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Derecho PUCP info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Derecho PUCP |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Derecho PUCP; No. 80 (2018): Civil Law; 391-423 Derecho PUCP; Núm. 80 (2018): Derecho Civil; 391-423 Derecho PUCP; n. 80 (2018): Direito Civil; 391-423 2305-2546 0251-3420 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1845975196617408512 |
score |
13.047584 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).