Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees

Descripción del Articulo

For centuries there has been debate as to which system is better for settling civil disputes. Thus, while some postulate that the written system is better because it provides greater legal certainty, others are inclined towards the oral system because of the undeniable reduction of procedural time a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Groppo, Patricio Gustavo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/30087
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/30087
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Proceso Civil
Oralidad
Sentencia
Civil Procedure
Hearing
Judgment
id REVPUCP_405c811ed2f4a732398b9d1103dfe9b9
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/30087
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guaranteesLa Oralidad en el Proceso Civil: ¿Es factible el dictado de una Sentencia Oral? Respuesta acorde a las garantías procesales argentinas y españolasGroppo, Patricio GustavoProceso CivilOralidadSentenciaCivil ProcedureHearingJudgmentFor centuries there has been debate as to which system is better for settling civil disputes. Thus, while some postulate that the written system is better because it provides greater legal certainty, others are inclined towards the oral system because of the undeniable reduction of procedural time and the benefits of the immediacy between the judge and the parties. Within this dichotomy, this paper seeks to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of oral sentencing in Spain, where it is expressly prohibited, and in Argentina, where there is no specific prohibition in the legal system.Before doing so, a retrospective view of the history of orality in both countries will be made.Durante siglos se ha debatido en torno a qué sistema resulta mejor para dirimir las contiendas civiles. Así, mientras algunos postulan que es mejor el Escrito por brindar mayor seguridad jurídica; otros se inclinan por el Oral por la incontrastable reducción de los tiempos procesales y los beneficios que trae la inmediación entre el juez y las partes.Dentro de esa dicotomía, el presente trabajo procura analizar las bondades y desventajas que brinda el dictar la sentencia en forma oral en España, donde se encuentra expresamente vedado, y en Argentina, donde no hay una prohibición puntual en el ordenamiento jurídico. Previo a ello, se hará una visión retrospectiva sobre la historia de la oralidad en los dos países.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2024-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/3008710.18800/dys.202401.010Derecho & Sociedad; Núm. 62 (2024): Derecho Médico; 1-222521-599X2079-3634reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/30087/26987http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/300872024-12-02T20:48:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
La Oralidad en el Proceso Civil: ¿Es factible el dictado de una Sentencia Oral? Respuesta acorde a las garantías procesales argentinas y españolas
title Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
spellingShingle Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
Groppo, Patricio Gustavo
Proceso Civil
Oralidad
Sentencia
Civil Procedure
Hearing
Judgment
title_short Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
title_full Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
title_fullStr Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
title_full_unstemmed Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
title_sort Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Groppo, Patricio Gustavo
author Groppo, Patricio Gustavo
author_facet Groppo, Patricio Gustavo
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Proceso Civil
Oralidad
Sentencia
Civil Procedure
Hearing
Judgment
topic Proceso Civil
Oralidad
Sentencia
Civil Procedure
Hearing
Judgment
description For centuries there has been debate as to which system is better for settling civil disputes. Thus, while some postulate that the written system is better because it provides greater legal certainty, others are inclined towards the oral system because of the undeniable reduction of procedural time and the benefits of the immediacy between the judge and the parties. Within this dichotomy, this paper seeks to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of oral sentencing in Spain, where it is expressly prohibited, and in Argentina, where there is no specific prohibition in the legal system.Before doing so, a retrospective view of the history of orality in both countries will be made.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-09-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/30087
10.18800/dys.202401.010
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/30087
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/dys.202401.010
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/30087/26987
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho & Sociedad; Núm. 62 (2024): Derecho Médico; 1-22
2521-599X
2079-3634
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900441853919232
score 13.376914
Orality in the Civil Procedure: Is the issuance of an Oral Sentence feasible? Response in accordance with Argentine and Spanish procedural guarantees
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares