Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence

Descripción del Articulo

In this work the possibility of deriving diachronic conclusions from the study of conceptual orality in literature is tested. With this purpose, some theatrical translated texts from Plautus and Terence of the 16th and 19th centuries are compared. The research concentrates on syntactic strategies re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Quesada, Santiago Del Rey
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22365
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/lexis/article/view/22365
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Inmediatez comunicativa
Traducción
Sintaxis
Oralidad elaborada
Communicative immediacy
Translation
Syntax
Elaborated orality
id REVPUCP_2b54a4128320f944b29166780f274a36
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22365
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and TerenceHacia una diacronía de la oralidad: el inicio de turno y la inmediatez comunicativa en un corpus de traducciones de Plauto y Terencio (ss. XVI y XIX)Quesada, Santiago Del ReyInmediatez comunicativaTraducciónSintaxisOralidad elaboradaCommunicative immediacyTranslationSyntaxElaborated oralityIn this work the possibility of deriving diachronic conclusions from the study of conceptual orality in literature is tested. With this purpose, some theatrical translated texts from Plautus and Terence of the 16th and 19th centuries are compared. The research concentrates on syntactic strategies related to the beginning of the dialogical turn. Throughout the analysis I discuss whether mechanisms which shape oral textuality in theatrical literature in the 16th and in the 19th century are the same or they undergo significant variations across time. Furthermore, the influence of Latin source text in the constitution of fictional orality strategies within the corpus is considered.En este trabajo discutimos la posibilidad de extraer conclusiones de índole diacrónica en el estudio de la oralidad concepcional a partir de la comparación de textos teatrales traducidos de Plauto y Terencio en el siglo XVI y en el siglo XIX. El foco de interés del artículo son las estrategias sintácticas en la posición de inicio de turno conversacional. En el análisis, nos preguntamos si los mecanismos de textualización de la oralidad que se dan en dicha posición tienen continuidad del siglo XVI al XIX o si estos sufren modificaciones importantes. Asimismo, tenemos en cuenta la influencia del texto fuente en la conformación de las estrategias de mimesis de la oralidad en el corpus.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2020-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/lexis/article/view/22365Lexis; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020); 41-74Lexis; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2020); 41-740254-9239reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/lexis/article/view/22365/21617info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/223652023-09-05T16:33:04Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence
Hacia una diacronía de la oralidad: el inicio de turno y la inmediatez comunicativa en un corpus de traducciones de Plauto y Terencio (ss. XVI y XIX)
title Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence
spellingShingle Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence
Quesada, Santiago Del Rey
Inmediatez comunicativa
Traducción
Sintaxis
Oralidad elaborada
Communicative immediacy
Translation
Syntax
Elaborated orality
title_short Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence
title_full Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence
title_fullStr Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence
title_sort Towards a Diachrony of Orality: The Beginning of the Dialogical Turn and Communicative Immediacy in 16th and 19th Century Translations of Plautus and Terence
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Quesada, Santiago Del Rey
author Quesada, Santiago Del Rey
author_facet Quesada, Santiago Del Rey
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Inmediatez comunicativa
Traducción
Sintaxis
Oralidad elaborada
Communicative immediacy
Translation
Syntax
Elaborated orality
topic Inmediatez comunicativa
Traducción
Sintaxis
Oralidad elaborada
Communicative immediacy
Translation
Syntax
Elaborated orality
description In this work the possibility of deriving diachronic conclusions from the study of conceptual orality in literature is tested. With this purpose, some theatrical translated texts from Plautus and Terence of the 16th and 19th centuries are compared. The research concentrates on syntactic strategies related to the beginning of the dialogical turn. Throughout the analysis I discuss whether mechanisms which shape oral textuality in theatrical literature in the 16th and in the 19th century are the same or they undergo significant variations across time. Furthermore, the influence of Latin source text in the constitution of fictional orality strategies within the corpus is considered.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/lexis/article/view/22365
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/lexis/article/view/22365
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/lexis/article/view/22365/21617
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Lexis; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020); 41-74
Lexis; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2020); 41-74
0254-9239
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1845975185391353856
score 13.047584
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).