The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence

Descripción del Articulo

Within the framework of the process of constitutionalization of Law, the treatment towards antitrust  regulation is being discussed on the jurisprudential level. An idea has appeared that suggests that deciding against antitrust regulationis  beneficial for companies, but has a negative impact towar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Sumar Albujar, Oscar
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/14469
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14469
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Constitutional Court
United States Supreme Court
antitrust
Economic Constitution
Tribunal Constitucional
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos
libre competencia
Constitución económica
id REVPUCP_23ab20352b0f1b307022ae86fa644cb4
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/14469
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudenceLa Corte de Roberts (Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos) versus el Tribunal Constitucional peruano: la libre competencia en la jurisprudencia constitucionalSumar Albujar, OscarConstitutional CourtUnited States Supreme CourtantitrustEconomic ConstitutionTribunal ConstitucionalCorte Suprema de Estados Unidoslibre competenciaConstitución económicaWithin the framework of the process of constitutionalization of Law, the treatment towards antitrust  regulation is being discussed on the jurisprudential level. An idea has appeared that suggests that deciding against antitrust regulationis  beneficial for companies, but has a negative impact towards societyIn the present article, the author does a comparison between the Peruvian Constitutional Court jurisprudence about antitrust and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States, demonstrating that tending towards regulation is harmful for society.The author also raises the question about the reasons for which the Supreme Court of the United States has a clear and defined criteria to decide when it is convenient to regulate antitrust, called “decision theory”, while the Peruvian  Court  has an erratic and unjustified criteria to decide aboutregulation of antitrust.En el marco del proceso de constitucionalización del Derecho, el tratamiento de la libre competencia se ha venido discutiendo a nivel jurisprudencial. Así, ha surgido la idea de que decidir no regu-lar la libre competencia beneficia a las empresas,mas no a la sociedad en general.En el presente artículo, el autor propone una comparación entre la jurisprudencia respecto a la libre competencia del Tribunal Constitucional peruano y la de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, buscando demostrar que, más bien, tender a la re- gulación es perjudicial para la sociedad.Asimismo, el autor abre la interrogante acerca de las razones por las cuales la Corte estadounidense tiene un criterio claro respecto a cuándo no es conveniente la regulación, mientras que el Tribunal peruano tiene un criterio errático y no justificado para tomar decisiones al respecto.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2015-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14469THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 67 (2015): Derecho Constitucional; 217-2251810-9934reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14469/15081Derechos de autor 2016 THĒMIS-Revista de Derechohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/144692019-07-02T15:47:56Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
La Corte de Roberts (Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos) versus el Tribunal Constitucional peruano: la libre competencia en la jurisprudencia constitucional
title The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
spellingShingle The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
Sumar Albujar, Oscar
Constitutional Court
United States Supreme Court
antitrust
Economic Constitution
Tribunal Constitucional
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos
libre competencia
Constitución económica
title_short The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
title_full The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
title_fullStr The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
title_full_unstemmed The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
title_sort The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sumar Albujar, Oscar
author Sumar Albujar, Oscar
author_facet Sumar Albujar, Oscar
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Constitutional Court
United States Supreme Court
antitrust
Economic Constitution
Tribunal Constitucional
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos
libre competencia
Constitución económica
topic Constitutional Court
United States Supreme Court
antitrust
Economic Constitution
Tribunal Constitucional
Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos
libre competencia
Constitución económica
description Within the framework of the process of constitutionalization of Law, the treatment towards antitrust  regulation is being discussed on the jurisprudential level. An idea has appeared that suggests that deciding against antitrust regulationis  beneficial for companies, but has a negative impact towards societyIn the present article, the author does a comparison between the Peruvian Constitutional Court jurisprudence about antitrust and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States, demonstrating that tending towards regulation is harmful for society.The author also raises the question about the reasons for which the Supreme Court of the United States has a clear and defined criteria to decide when it is convenient to regulate antitrust, called “decision theory”, while the Peruvian  Court  has an erratic and unjustified criteria to decide aboutregulation of antitrust.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14469
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14469
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/14469/15081
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 67 (2015): Derecho Constitucional; 217-225
1810-9934
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840901176771477504
score 13.451866
The Court of Roberts (the United States Supreme Court) versus the peruvian Constitutional Court: free competition in constitutional jurisprudence
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares