One, two, three... fourteen! Or sixty-six Trust and notion of the final consumer: a case of electronic commerce in consumer protection

• Autor: Aldana Ramos, Edwin Gabriel
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2018
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:revistaspuc:article/20369
• Enlace del recurso: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/20369
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Comercio electrónico; Consumidor; Habitualidad; Contrato; Precio; Error; Electronic commerce; Consumer; Habituality; Contract; Price

This article is based on an electronic commerce case in consumer protection. We are not unprotected by the absence of a special regulation, but we must build the foundations for this trade to develop properly. Who put a complaint can be considered final consumer? because it does not acquire one, two, three or fourteen, (a reference to Vertigo of U2) but sixty-six products to S /. 1 that regularly cost more than S /. 1 000. Is the last agreement improved? and can the supplier of the operation carried out be withdrawn when considering the price of their offered products derisory? I incide in the need to generate confidence in the consumer, and that this is possible if the provider gives security, simple but gravitating.