Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities

Descripción del Articulo

Expensive and excessive regulations may affect the number of firms by discouraging them to access and remain into the market. Despite of such a fact, worldwide there are few legal mechanisms within competition law able to control regulatory activity. This document describes briefly the Peruvian mech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14852
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:regulation
competition
regulatory impact assessment
competition advocacy
public utilities
bureaucratic barriers
responsive regulation
enforcement
regulación
competencia
análisis de impacto regulatorio
abogacía de la competencia
servicios públicos
barreras burocráticas
regulación responsiva
id REVPUCP_1f68070e973e8ec10d35f50da7752972
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14852
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities¿Es posible hacer cumplir la ley sin sancionar? Aplicando de manera «responsiva» la regulación en el Perú, a propósito del caso de abogacía de la competencia sobre las barreras burocráticas en el mercado de servicios públicosOchoa Mendoza, Franciscoregulationcompetitionregulatory impact assessmentcompetition advocacypublic utilitiesbureaucratic barriersresponsive regulationenforcementregulacióncompetenciaanálisis de impacto regulatorioabogacía de la competenciaservicios públicosbarreras burocráticasregulación responsivaenforcementExpensive and excessive regulations may affect the number of firms by discouraging them to access and remain into the market. Despite of such a fact, worldwide there are few legal mechanisms within competition law able to control regulatory activity. This document describes briefly the Peruvian mechanism of regulatory oversight through the Indecopi´s Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers Commission, which has reached in less than 3 years the voluntary elimination of more than 1000 regulatory and  administrative burdens affecting, inter alia, the market of the deployment of infrastructure on public utilities. This has been the result of a strategy that not relies on sanctioning administrative procedures but in a coordinative-oriented approach with the regulatees aiming to reach the effective accomplishment of the law. In turn, the development of such a strategy make possible to show a new style of enforcement in Peru, which has been studied and undertaken in other countries around the world, namely “Responsive Regulation”.Una regulación costosa y excesiva puede afectar negativamente la cantidad de ofertantes en el mercado, al desincentivar su acceso y/o permanencia en él. No obstante ello, en el mundo existen pocos mecanismos de defensa de la competencia que controlen este tipo de actividad. El presente artículo describe brevemente el mecanismo de control regulatorio empleado en el Perú a través de la Comisión de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas del Indecopi, la cual ha logrado en menos de 3 años la eliminación voluntaria de más de 1000 regulaciones y trabas administrativas que afectaban, entre otros, el mercado de infraestructura en servicios públicos, a través de una estrategia que prescinde del uso exclusivo de procedimientos sancionadores y privilegia la coordinación con los agentes regulados para lograr el cumplimiento efectivo de la ley. El desarrollo de esta estrategia, a su vez, permite demostrar la posibilidad de aplicar un nuevo estilo de «enforcement» en el Perú, que ha sido estudiado y adoptado en otros países del mundo, como es la «Regulación Responsiva».Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2016-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852Derecho PUCP; No. 76 (2016): Administrative Law: Regulation of Public Services and Competition; 151-180Derecho PUCP; Núm. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 151-180Derecho PUCP; n. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 151-1802305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852/15394Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/148522025-01-14T22:12:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
¿Es posible hacer cumplir la ley sin sancionar? Aplicando de manera «responsiva» la regulación en el Perú, a propósito del caso de abogacía de la competencia sobre las barreras burocráticas en el mercado de servicios públicos
title Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
spellingShingle Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco
regulation
competition
regulatory impact assessment
competition advocacy
public utilities
bureaucratic barriers
responsive regulation
enforcement
regulación
competencia
análisis de impacto regulatorio
abogacía de la competencia
servicios públicos
barreras burocráticas
regulación responsiva
enforcement
title_short Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
title_full Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
title_fullStr Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
title_full_unstemmed Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
title_sort Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco
author Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco
author_facet Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv regulation
competition
regulatory impact assessment
competition advocacy
public utilities
bureaucratic barriers
responsive regulation
enforcement
regulación
competencia
análisis de impacto regulatorio
abogacía de la competencia
servicios públicos
barreras burocráticas
regulación responsiva
enforcement
topic regulation
competition
regulatory impact assessment
competition advocacy
public utilities
bureaucratic barriers
responsive regulation
enforcement
regulación
competencia
análisis de impacto regulatorio
abogacía de la competencia
servicios públicos
barreras burocráticas
regulación responsiva
enforcement
description Expensive and excessive regulations may affect the number of firms by discouraging them to access and remain into the market. Despite of such a fact, worldwide there are few legal mechanisms within competition law able to control regulatory activity. This document describes briefly the Peruvian mechanism of regulatory oversight through the Indecopi´s Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers Commission, which has reached in less than 3 years the voluntary elimination of more than 1000 regulatory and  administrative burdens affecting, inter alia, the market of the deployment of infrastructure on public utilities. This has been the result of a strategy that not relies on sanctioning administrative procedures but in a coordinative-oriented approach with the regulatees aiming to reach the effective accomplishment of the law. In turn, the development of such a strategy make possible to show a new style of enforcement in Peru, which has been studied and undertaken in other countries around the world, namely “Responsive Regulation”.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852/15394
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho PUCP; No. 76 (2016): Administrative Law: Regulation of Public Services and Competition; 151-180
Derecho PUCP; Núm. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 151-180
Derecho PUCP; n. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 151-180
2305-2546
0251-3420
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844706528845627392
score 13.243185
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).