Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities
Descripción del Articulo
Expensive and excessive regulations may affect the number of firms by discouraging them to access and remain into the market. Despite of such a fact, worldwide there are few legal mechanisms within competition law able to control regulatory activity. This document describes briefly the Peruvian mech...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2016 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14852 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | regulation competition regulatory impact assessment competition advocacy public utilities bureaucratic barriers responsive regulation enforcement regulación competencia análisis de impacto regulatorio abogacía de la competencia servicios públicos barreras burocráticas regulación responsiva |
id |
REVPUCP_1f68070e973e8ec10d35f50da7752972 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14852 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities¿Es posible hacer cumplir la ley sin sancionar? Aplicando de manera «responsiva» la regulación en el Perú, a propósito del caso de abogacía de la competencia sobre las barreras burocráticas en el mercado de servicios públicosOchoa Mendoza, Franciscoregulationcompetitionregulatory impact assessmentcompetition advocacypublic utilitiesbureaucratic barriersresponsive regulationenforcementregulacióncompetenciaanálisis de impacto regulatorioabogacía de la competenciaservicios públicosbarreras burocráticasregulación responsivaenforcementExpensive and excessive regulations may affect the number of firms by discouraging them to access and remain into the market. Despite of such a fact, worldwide there are few legal mechanisms within competition law able to control regulatory activity. This document describes briefly the Peruvian mechanism of regulatory oversight through the Indecopi´s Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers Commission, which has reached in less than 3 years the voluntary elimination of more than 1000 regulatory and administrative burdens affecting, inter alia, the market of the deployment of infrastructure on public utilities. This has been the result of a strategy that not relies on sanctioning administrative procedures but in a coordinative-oriented approach with the regulatees aiming to reach the effective accomplishment of the law. In turn, the development of such a strategy make possible to show a new style of enforcement in Peru, which has been studied and undertaken in other countries around the world, namely “Responsive Regulation”.Una regulación costosa y excesiva puede afectar negativamente la cantidad de ofertantes en el mercado, al desincentivar su acceso y/o permanencia en él. No obstante ello, en el mundo existen pocos mecanismos de defensa de la competencia que controlen este tipo de actividad. El presente artículo describe brevemente el mecanismo de control regulatorio empleado en el Perú a través de la Comisión de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas del Indecopi, la cual ha logrado en menos de 3 años la eliminación voluntaria de más de 1000 regulaciones y trabas administrativas que afectaban, entre otros, el mercado de infraestructura en servicios públicos, a través de una estrategia que prescinde del uso exclusivo de procedimientos sancionadores y privilegia la coordinación con los agentes regulados para lograr el cumplimiento efectivo de la ley. El desarrollo de esta estrategia, a su vez, permite demostrar la posibilidad de aplicar un nuevo estilo de «enforcement» en el Perú, que ha sido estudiado y adoptado en otros países del mundo, como es la «Regulación Responsiva».Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2016-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852Derecho PUCP; No. 76 (2016): Administrative Law: Regulation of Public Services and Competition; 151-180Derecho PUCP; Núm. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 151-180Derecho PUCP; n. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 151-1802305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852/15394Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/148522025-01-14T22:12:17Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities ¿Es posible hacer cumplir la ley sin sancionar? Aplicando de manera «responsiva» la regulación en el Perú, a propósito del caso de abogacía de la competencia sobre las barreras burocráticas en el mercado de servicios públicos |
title |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities |
spellingShingle |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco regulation competition regulatory impact assessment competition advocacy public utilities bureaucratic barriers responsive regulation enforcement regulación competencia análisis de impacto regulatorio abogacía de la competencia servicios públicos barreras burocráticas regulación responsiva enforcement |
title_short |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities |
title_full |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities |
title_fullStr |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities |
title_sort |
Is it possible to enforce the law without sanctioning?: applying regulation with a “responsive” approach in Peru, with regard the advocacy strategy about the bureaucratic barriers in the market of public utilities |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco |
author |
Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco |
author_facet |
Ochoa Mendoza, Francisco |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
regulation competition regulatory impact assessment competition advocacy public utilities bureaucratic barriers responsive regulation enforcement regulación competencia análisis de impacto regulatorio abogacía de la competencia servicios públicos barreras burocráticas regulación responsiva enforcement |
topic |
regulation competition regulatory impact assessment competition advocacy public utilities bureaucratic barriers responsive regulation enforcement regulación competencia análisis de impacto regulatorio abogacía de la competencia servicios públicos barreras burocráticas regulación responsiva enforcement |
description |
Expensive and excessive regulations may affect the number of firms by discouraging them to access and remain into the market. Despite of such a fact, worldwide there are few legal mechanisms within competition law able to control regulatory activity. This document describes briefly the Peruvian mechanism of regulatory oversight through the Indecopi´s Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers Commission, which has reached in less than 3 years the voluntary elimination of more than 1000 regulatory and administrative burdens affecting, inter alia, the market of the deployment of infrastructure on public utilities. This has been the result of a strategy that not relies on sanctioning administrative procedures but in a coordinative-oriented approach with the regulatees aiming to reach the effective accomplishment of the law. In turn, the development of such a strategy make possible to show a new style of enforcement in Peru, which has been studied and undertaken in other countries around the world, namely “Responsive Regulation”. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-25 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14852/15394 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Derecho PUCP; No. 76 (2016): Administrative Law: Regulation of Public Services and Competition; 151-180 Derecho PUCP; Núm. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 151-180 Derecho PUCP; n. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 151-180 2305-2546 0251-3420 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1844706528845627392 |
score |
13.243185 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).