The «procedural autonomy» and the Constitutional Court: notes on an invented relationship

Descripción del Articulo

The author deals with the background of what is known as the institute of «procedural autonomy»; to this end he employs the study made by the Spanish author Patricia Rodríguez-Mendoza and concludes that the study does not, in fact, deal with «procedural autonomy» (proceeding) but rather «procedural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Monroy Gálvez, Juan
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2007
Institución:Poder Judicial del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/102
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/102
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:procedural autonomy
Constitutional Court
procedural
autonomía procesal
Tribunal Constitucional
proceso
procedimiento
Descripción
Sumario:The author deals with the background of what is known as the institute of «procedural autonomy»; to this end he employs the study made by the Spanish author Patricia Rodríguez-Mendoza and concludes that the study does not, in fact, deal with «procedural autonomy» (proceeding) but rather «procedural autonomy». Finally, the author concludes that with his article he looks to reveal that the use of the Constitutional Procedural Autonomy has been the foundation for the harmful effects caused in various verdict of the Constitutional Court.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).