Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing

Descripción del Articulo

In view of the material impossibility that all actions received by the criminal justice system can be subject to linear common proceedings, the simplification methods become of vital importance within criminal development itself, which facilitate the anticipated conclusion of the proceeding upon agr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Brousset Salas, Ricardo Alberto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2009
Institución:Poder Judicial del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/180
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/180
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Anticipated conclusion of a lawsuit
Plea bargaining or anticipated conclusion proceeding
Conclusión anticipada del juicio
Proceso de terminación anticipada
id REVPJ_31489db1b6dcccdea77836e42c2a94b1
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/180
network_acronym_str REVPJ
network_name_str Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processingLegitimación de las fórmulas consensuadas simplificatorias del procesamiento penalBrousset Salas, Ricardo AlbertoAnticipated conclusion of a lawsuitPlea bargaining or anticipated conclusion proceedingConclusión anticipada del juicioProceso de terminación anticipadaIn view of the material impossibility that all actions received by the criminal justice system can be subject to linear common proceedings, the simplification methods become of vital importance within criminal development itself, which facilitate the anticipated conclusion of the proceeding upon agreement. The Peruvian Code of Criminal Procedures has developed two methods: an anticipated conclusion of a lawsuit and the so-called plea bargaining or anticipated conclusion proceeding, both of general application and with no limitations as to the punishments to be imposed by prosecution. These are developed by the author, proposing certain conditions that would make them feasibleAnte la imposibilidad material de que todas las causas que ingresan al sistema penal puedan ser objeto de procesos comunes lineales, cobran vital importancia dentro del desarrollo penal propiamente dicho, las fórmulas de simplificación que a partir del consenso posibilitan una definición anticipada del proceso. El Código Procesal Penal del Perú ha desarrollado dos fórmulas: la conclusión anticipada del juicio y el denominado proceso de terminación anticipada, ambos de aplicación general sin límites en la punición requerida por el fiscal. Estas son desarrolladas por el autor, proponiendo determinadas condiciones que les darían viabilidad constitucionalPoder Judicial del Perú2009-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/18010.35292/ropj.v5i5.180Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2009); 77-1012663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v5i5reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/180/240info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/1802021-07-16T04:52:20Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
Legitimación de las fórmulas consensuadas simplificatorias del procesamiento penal
title Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
spellingShingle Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
Brousset Salas, Ricardo Alberto
Anticipated conclusion of a lawsuit
Plea bargaining or anticipated conclusion proceeding
Conclusión anticipada del juicio
Proceso de terminación anticipada
title_short Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
title_full Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
title_fullStr Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
title_full_unstemmed Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
title_sort Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Brousset Salas, Ricardo Alberto
author Brousset Salas, Ricardo Alberto
author_facet Brousset Salas, Ricardo Alberto
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Anticipated conclusion of a lawsuit
Plea bargaining or anticipated conclusion proceeding
Conclusión anticipada del juicio
Proceso de terminación anticipada
topic Anticipated conclusion of a lawsuit
Plea bargaining or anticipated conclusion proceeding
Conclusión anticipada del juicio
Proceso de terminación anticipada
description In view of the material impossibility that all actions received by the criminal justice system can be subject to linear common proceedings, the simplification methods become of vital importance within criminal development itself, which facilitate the anticipated conclusion of the proceeding upon agreement. The Peruvian Code of Criminal Procedures has developed two methods: an anticipated conclusion of a lawsuit and the so-called plea bargaining or anticipated conclusion proceeding, both of general application and with no limitations as to the punishments to be imposed by prosecution. These are developed by the author, proposing certain conditions that would make them feasible
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/180
10.35292/ropj.v5i5.180
url https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/180
identifier_str_mv 10.35292/ropj.v5i5.180
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/180/240
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2009); 77-101
2663-9130
1997-6682
10.35292/ropj.v5i5
reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
instname:Poder Judicial del Perú
instacron:PJ
instname_str Poder Judicial del Perú
instacron_str PJ
institution PJ
reponame_str Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
collection Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846797558969532416
score 12.636967
Legitimation of the simplifying consensus formulas for criminal processing
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares