The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship
Descripción del Articulo
The emergence of digital platforms brought substantial changes in the global economy, and with them a legal challenge to the new atypical work modalities, where the employers are not the same traditional employers ones, but applications such as Uber, Glovo, Cabify, Rappi, etc. In this regard, in our...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/352 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | digital platform employee delivery employment relationship plataforma digital trabajador relación laboral |
id |
REVPJ_0fcebfb0c69be47483db1d29bc4c8d0d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/352 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPJ |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationshipEl repartidor y una app de delivery: argumentos de una relación laboralTorres Cadillo, Rosa Isabeldigital platformemployeedeliveryemployment relationshipplataforma digitaltrabajadordeliveryrelación laboralThe emergence of digital platforms brought substantial changes in the global economy, and with them a legal challenge to the new atypical work modalities, where the employers are not the same traditional employers ones, but applications such as Uber, Glovo, Cabify, Rappi, etc. In this regard, in our country, several bills sought to regulate the link between the service provided and the digital platform, under the figure of an employment relationship. However, it is the owners of these digital sites who reject their status as employers, defining themselves as intermediaries between service providers and their clients, intending to evade labor rights. Therefore, the question arises: «Is a Rappi or Glovo delivery person an employee of the company?». We consider that he/she is since he/she is subordinate and remunerated.La aparición de las plataformas digitales trajo consigo cambios sustanciales en la economía mundial, y con ellos un reto jurídico ante las nuevas modalidades de trabajo atípicas, donde los empleadores no son los tradicionales empleadores, sino aplicativos como Uber, Glovo, Cabify, Rapi, etc. Al respecto, en nuestro país, se produjeron varios proyectos de ley que buscaban regular el vínculo entre el servicio prestado y la plataforma digital, bajo la figura de una relación laboral. Empero, son los dueños de estos sitios digitales quienes rechazan su condición de empleadores, definiéndose como intermediarios entre los proveedores de servicios y sus clientes, con el propósito de evadir los derechos laborales. Ante ello, surge la pregunta: «¿Un repartidor de Rappi o Glovo es trabajador de la empresa?». Nosotros consideramos que sí lo es, al contar con subordinación y remuneración.Equipo Técnico Institucional de Implementación de la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo del Poder Judicial2021-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/35210.47308/rdpt.v3i3.9The Review of Procedural Labor Law; Vol 3 No 3 (2021): January - June; 181-193Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2021): Enero - Junio; 181-193Revista de Direito Processual do Trabalho; v. 3 n. 3 (2021): Enero - Junio; 181-1932708-927410.47308/rdpt.v3i3reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352/513https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352/825https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352/549Derechos de autor 2021 Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/3522022-08-05T01:42:42Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship El repartidor y una app de delivery: argumentos de una relación laboral |
title |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship |
spellingShingle |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship Torres Cadillo, Rosa Isabel digital platform employee delivery employment relationship plataforma digital trabajador delivery relación laboral |
title_short |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship |
title_full |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship |
title_fullStr |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship |
title_full_unstemmed |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship |
title_sort |
The relationship between a delivery driver and a delivery app: Arguments of an employment relationship |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Torres Cadillo, Rosa Isabel |
author |
Torres Cadillo, Rosa Isabel |
author_facet |
Torres Cadillo, Rosa Isabel |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
digital platform employee delivery employment relationship plataforma digital trabajador delivery relación laboral |
topic |
digital platform employee delivery employment relationship plataforma digital trabajador delivery relación laboral |
description |
The emergence of digital platforms brought substantial changes in the global economy, and with them a legal challenge to the new atypical work modalities, where the employers are not the same traditional employers ones, but applications such as Uber, Glovo, Cabify, Rappi, etc. In this regard, in our country, several bills sought to regulate the link between the service provided and the digital platform, under the figure of an employment relationship. However, it is the owners of these digital sites who reject their status as employers, defining themselves as intermediaries between service providers and their clients, intending to evade labor rights. Therefore, the question arises: «Is a Rappi or Glovo delivery person an employee of the company?». We consider that he/she is since he/she is subordinate and remunerated. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-15 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352 10.47308/rdpt.v3i3.9 |
url |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.47308/rdpt.v3i3.9 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352/513 https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352/825 https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/rdpt/article/view/352/549 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Equipo Técnico Institucional de Implementación de la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo del Poder Judicial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Equipo Técnico Institucional de Implementación de la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo del Poder Judicial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
The Review of Procedural Labor Law; Vol 3 No 3 (2021): January - June; 181-193 Revista de Derecho Procesal del Trabajo; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2021): Enero - Junio; 181-193 Revista de Direito Processual do Trabalho; v. 3 n. 3 (2021): Enero - Junio; 181-193 2708-9274 10.47308/rdpt.v3i3 reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú instname:Poder Judicial del Perú instacron:PJ |
instname_str |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
instacron_str |
PJ |
institution |
PJ |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1832845680403546112 |
score |
13.982926 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).