Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco
Descripción del Articulo
The non-applicability of the evidentiary conventions in the preliminary investigation courts of the Judicial District of Huánuco, in the period 2018-2022, is due to the fact that the procedural parties did not propose them in the intermediate stage. Proof of this is that the judges did not approve t...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/677 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/article/view/677 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | evidentiary conventions Judicial District of Huánuco judges hearing convenciones probatorias Distrito Judicial de Huánuco jueces audiencia |
id |
REVPJ_0adcb29d3b9695c03a9e1658e8d11418 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/677 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPJ |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of HuánucoInaplicabilidad de las convenciones probatorias en el Distrito Judicial de HuánucoVentocilla Ricaldi, Edwin Franciscoevidentiary conventionsJudicial District of Huánucojudgeshearingconvenciones probatoriasDistrito Judicial de HuánucojuecesaudienciaThe non-applicability of the evidentiary conventions in the preliminary investigation courts of the Judicial District of Huánuco, in the period 2018-2022, is due to the fact that the procedural parties did not propose them in the intermediate stage. Proof of this is that the judges did not approve them or disassociate themselves. It is also due to the fact that judges do not have legal protection to propose or formulate evidentiary conventions in court hearings, since this does not contribute to the principles of economy, speed and procedural efficiency, as long as they send uncontroversial proven facts for debate, which become one more tributary of overload for the oral trial.La inaplicabilidad de las convenciones probatorias en los juzgados de investigación preparatoria del Distrito Judicial de Huánuco en el período 2018 a octubre de 2022 se debe a que las partes procesales no las propusieron en la etapa intermedia. Prueba de ello es que los jueces no las aprobaron ni se desvincularon de ellas; también se debe a que los jueces no tienen amparo legal para proponer y formular convenciones probatorias en audiencia. En consecuencia, ello no contribuye a los principios de economía, celeridad y eficiencia procesal, en tanto que envían para el debate hechos probados no controvertidos, lo que se convierte en un afluente más de sobrecarga para el juicio oral.Corte Superior de Justicia de Huánuco2022-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/article/view/67710.35292/iusVocatio.v5i6.677Ius vocatio; Vol 5 No 6 (2022): July - December; 63-73Ius vocatio; Vol. 5 Núm. 6 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 63-732810-804310.35292/iusVocatio.v5i6reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/article/view/677/989https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/article/view/677/931Derechos de autor 2022 Edwin Francisco Ventocilla Ricaldihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/6772023-01-24T05:17:47Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco Inaplicabilidad de las convenciones probatorias en el Distrito Judicial de Huánuco |
title |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco |
spellingShingle |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco Ventocilla Ricaldi, Edwin Francisco evidentiary conventions Judicial District of Huánuco judges hearing convenciones probatorias Distrito Judicial de Huánuco jueces audiencia |
title_short |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco |
title_full |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco |
title_fullStr |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco |
title_sort |
Non-applicability of evidentiary conventions in Judicial District of Huánuco |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ventocilla Ricaldi, Edwin Francisco |
author |
Ventocilla Ricaldi, Edwin Francisco |
author_facet |
Ventocilla Ricaldi, Edwin Francisco |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
evidentiary conventions Judicial District of Huánuco judges hearing convenciones probatorias Distrito Judicial de Huánuco jueces audiencia |
topic |
evidentiary conventions Judicial District of Huánuco judges hearing convenciones probatorias Distrito Judicial de Huánuco jueces audiencia |
description |
The non-applicability of the evidentiary conventions in the preliminary investigation courts of the Judicial District of Huánuco, in the period 2018-2022, is due to the fact that the procedural parties did not propose them in the intermediate stage. Proof of this is that the judges did not approve them or disassociate themselves. It is also due to the fact that judges do not have legal protection to propose or formulate evidentiary conventions in court hearings, since this does not contribute to the principles of economy, speed and procedural efficiency, as long as they send uncontroversial proven facts for debate, which become one more tributary of overload for the oral trial. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-19 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/article/view/677 10.35292/iusVocatio.v5i6.677 |
url |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/article/view/677 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35292/iusVocatio.v5i6.677 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/article/view/677/989 https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/iusVocatio/article/view/677/931 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Edwin Francisco Ventocilla Ricaldi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Edwin Francisco Ventocilla Ricaldi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Corte Superior de Justicia de Huánuco |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Corte Superior de Justicia de Huánuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ius vocatio; Vol 5 No 6 (2022): July - December; 63-73 Ius vocatio; Vol. 5 Núm. 6 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 63-73 2810-8043 10.35292/iusVocatio.v5i6 reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú instname:Poder Judicial del Perú instacron:PJ |
instname_str |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
instacron_str |
PJ |
institution |
PJ |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1832845683134038016 |
score |
13.982926 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).