Design and Evaluation of Centrifugally Reinforced Concrete Poles Under Extreme Wind Loads: A Dynamic Simulation-Based Approach According to CFE J6100-54 and ASCE Manual 74 Standards

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of this research was to comparatively evaluate the structural response of a 21 m centrifugally reinforced concrete (C.A.C.) pole subjected to wind loads, applying the methodologies of ASCE 74 and CFE J6100-54 standards. The pole was modeled in SAP2000 v22 using both static and time-history d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Cielo Marina, Pablo Francisco
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Tayacaja Daniel Hernández Morillo
Repositorio:Revista de investigación científica y tecnológica Llamkasun
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.llamkasun.unat.edu.pe:article/138
Enlace del recurso:https://llamkasun.unat.edu.pe/index.php/revista/article/view/138
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Poste tensión de C°A°
Carga de viento
Respuesta estructural
CFE
ASCE 74
Reinforced concrete tension pole
Wind load
Structural response
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this research was to comparatively evaluate the structural response of a 21 m centrifugally reinforced concrete (C.A.C.) pole subjected to wind loads, applying the methodologies of ASCE 74 and CFE J6100-54 standards. The pole was modeled in SAP2000 v22 using both static and time-history dynamic analyses, considering service, maintenance, failure, and extreme wind load scenarios. Wind data were generated using the NOWS simulator for velicities up to 27.78 m/s. Results show a maximum displacement of 0.28 m under CFE and 0.20 m under ASCE, while maximum bending moments reached 145.92 kN.m and 133.47 kN.m, respectively. Statistical validation using ANOVA revealed non-significant differences (Fcalc=2.17 < Fcrit=4.26; p=0.144 > 0.05), confirming the technical equivalence between the standards. It is concluded that ASCE 74 provides higher accuracy by incorporating gust response factors (GRF) up to 1.08, enhancing the design against transient loads. This research establishes a robust methodological framework to improve structural resilience and the safety of urban electrical infrastructure.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).