The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model

Descripción del Articulo

Problem and objectives: To find out if the structure of the prosocial behavior measured by the Prosocial Behavior Scale (PBS) can be represented by a general factor, i.e. prosociality, combined with specific factors: the subscales of the PBS. Method: The sample consisted of 692 subjects (65% females...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Auné, Sofía Esmeralda, Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo, Attorresi, Horacio Félix
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Liberabit
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/241
Enlace del recurso:http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:conducta prosocial
prosocialidad
teoría de la respuesta al ítem multidimensional
modelo bifactorial
id REVLI_274f4171aace5fc1eb185432b967dbd2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/241
network_acronym_str REVLI
network_name_str Liberabit
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model
La estructura de la conducta prosocial. Su aproximación mediante el modelo bifactorial de la Teoría de la respuesta al Ítem Multidimensional
A estrutura do comportamento pró-social. Sua aproximação pelo modelo bifatorial da teoria da resposta multidimensional a itens
title The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model
spellingShingle The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model
Auné, Sofía Esmeralda
conducta prosocial
prosocialidad
teoría de la respuesta al ítem multidimensional
modelo bifactorial
title_short The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model
title_full The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model
title_fullStr The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model
title_full_unstemmed The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model
title_sort The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor model
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Auné, Sofía Esmeralda
Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo
Attorresi, Horacio Félix
author Auné, Sofía Esmeralda
author_facet Auné, Sofía Esmeralda
Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo
Attorresi, Horacio Félix
author_role author
author2 Abal, Facundo Juan Pablo
Attorresi, Horacio Félix
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv conducta prosocial
prosocialidad
teoría de la respuesta al ítem multidimensional
modelo bifactorial
topic conducta prosocial
prosocialidad
teoría de la respuesta al ítem multidimensional
modelo bifactorial
description Problem and objectives: To find out if the structure of the prosocial behavior measured by the Prosocial Behavior Scale (PBS) can be represented by a general factor, i.e. prosociality, combined with specific factors: the subscales of the PBS. Method: The sample consisted of 692 subjects (65% females) recruited by a convenience sampling method and living in Greater Buenos Aires and inland areas of Argentina. The assumptions of unidimensionality and local dependence were checked. Then the relative fit was compared between three models of the Item Response Theory: Graded Response Model (GRM), Multidimensional Graded Response Model (MGRM) and Two-Factor Graded Response Model (TGRM). Results: The TGRM showed the best relative fit. This model was implemented by calculating the conditional and marginal parameters. Likewise, the ECV index was calculated. Conclusions: The PBS items were primarily influenced by prosociality. The Help subscale explained a significant proportion of the common variance. In contrast, the Comfort subscale, considered as a specific factor, explained a small part of said variance.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241
10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.04
url http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241
identifier_str_mv 10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.04
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241/173
http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241/182
http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241/198
http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241/199
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Sofía Auné
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Sofía Auné
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/xml
application/zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de San Martín de Porres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de San Martín de Porres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2019): enero - junio; 41 - 56
LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2019): enero - junio; 41 - 56
LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2019): enero - junio; 41 - 56
2223-7666
1729-4827
reponame:Liberabit
instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron:USMP
instname_str Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron_str USMP
institution USMP
reponame_str Liberabit
collection Liberabit
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1845619410612518912
spelling The structure of prosocial behavior. Its approach through the Multidimensional Item Response Theory’s two-factor modelLa estructura de la conducta prosocial. Su aproximación mediante el modelo bifactorial de la Teoría de la respuesta al Ítem MultidimensionalA estrutura do comportamento pró-social. Sua aproximação pelo modelo bifatorial da teoria da resposta multidimensional a itensAuné, Sofía EsmeraldaAbal, Facundo Juan PabloAttorresi, Horacio Félixconducta prosocialprosocialidadteoría de la respuesta al ítem multidimensionalmodelo bifactorialProblem and objectives: To find out if the structure of the prosocial behavior measured by the Prosocial Behavior Scale (PBS) can be represented by a general factor, i.e. prosociality, combined with specific factors: the subscales of the PBS. Method: The sample consisted of 692 subjects (65% females) recruited by a convenience sampling method and living in Greater Buenos Aires and inland areas of Argentina. The assumptions of unidimensionality and local dependence were checked. Then the relative fit was compared between three models of the Item Response Theory: Graded Response Model (GRM), Multidimensional Graded Response Model (MGRM) and Two-Factor Graded Response Model (TGRM). Results: The TGRM showed the best relative fit. This model was implemented by calculating the conditional and marginal parameters. Likewise, the ECV index was calculated. Conclusions: The PBS items were primarily influenced by prosociality. The Help subscale explained a significant proportion of the common variance. In contrast, the Comfort subscale, considered as a specific factor, explained a small part of said variance.Problema y objetivos: Conocer si la estructura de la conducta prosocial medida por la Escala de Conducta Prosocial (ECP) puede ser representada por un factor general, la prosocialidad, combinado con los factores específicos, las subescalas de la ECP. Método: Se trató de una muestra por accesibilidad de 692 participantes (65% mujeres), residentes en Gran Buenos Aires e interior de la Argentina. Se comprobaron los supuestos de unidimensionalidad y dependencia local, posteriormente se comparó el ajuste relativo entre tres modelos de la Teoría de la Respuesta al Ítem: Modelo de Respuesta Graduada (MRG), Modelo de Respuesta Graduada Multidimensional (MRGM) y Modelo de Respuesta Graduada Bifactorial (MRGB). Resultados: El MRGB fue el modelo con mejor ajuste relativo, se implementó dicho modelo calculándose los parámetros condicionales y marginales. Asimismo, se calculó el índice ECV. Conclusiones: Los ítems de la ECP fueron influenciados primariamente por la prosocialidad. La subescala Ayuda explicó una proporción importante de la varianza común. En cambio, la subescala Confortar, considerada como factor específico, explicó una parte pequeña de dicha varianza.Problema e Objectivos: Para determinar se a estrutura de comportamento pró-social medido pela Escala de Comportamento Prosocial (ECP) pode ser representado por um factor geral, prosociality, combinado com factores específicos, as subescalas de ECP. Método: Foi uma amostra para acessibilidade de 692 participantes (65% mulheres), residentes da Grande Buenos Aires e do interior da Argentina. casos de dimensionalidade e dependência local está marcada, então o ajuste relativo entre três modelos da Teoria da Resposta ao Item foi comparado: bifatorial Modelo resposta gradual (MRG), Modelo resposta gradual Multidimensional (MRGM) e Modelo resposta gradual (MRGB). Resultados: O MRGB foi o modelo com o melhor ajuste relativo, este modelo foi implementado calculando os parâmetros condicionais e marginais. Da mesma forma, o índice ECV foi calculado. Conclusões: Os itens da ECP foram influenciados principalmente pela prosocialidade. A subescala Ajuda explicou uma proporção significativa da variação comum. Em contrapartida, a subescala Confortar, considerada como um fator específico, explicou uma pequena parte dessa variância.Universidad de San Martín de Porres2019-06-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlapplication/ziphttp://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/24110.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.04LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2019): enero - junio; 41 - 56LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2019): enero - junio; 41 - 56LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2019): enero - junio; 41 - 562223-76661729-4827reponame:Liberabitinstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPspahttp://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241/173http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241/182http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241/198http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/241/199Derechos de autor 2019 Sofía Aunéhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/2412019-06-27T21:32:20Z
score 12.789326
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).