Psychometric properties of the stress coping scale focused on emotion in hospitalized patients of the INMP – 2024

• Autores: Silva Dominguez, Daniel Sergio, Chávez Ochoa , Paola, Ponce Meza, Jacqueline Cynthia, Oropeza Chinchay, Heiseth Yesenia, Chirinos, Jennifer, Gabriel Mego, Fiorella Shandal, Barbosa Solano, Idelsa, Velazco Contreras, Andrea Isabel
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2025
• Institución: Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal
• Repositorio: Revista Peruana de Investigación Materno Perinatal
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:ojs.www.fracturae.com:article/400
• Enlace del recurso: https://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/400
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Confiabilidad; Validez; Análisis factorial; Estrategias Afrontamiento; Reliability; Validity; Factor Analysis; Coping Skills

Introduction: Emotional coping is essential in pregnant women with complications. Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the Brief Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI-FV) in hospitalized patients at the Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal. Materials and Methods: Psychometric instrumental study using secondary data from women over 18 years old without a history of mental disorders, obtained from two previous investigations. The first sample (n=208) was used to describe the items and perform confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the original model, as well as exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of five alternative models: four-, three-, and two-dimensional structures, and two unidimensional models—six factorial structures in total. Reliability (Cronbach’s alpha, ordinal alpha, and omega) and validity (CFI, TLI, SRMR, RMSEA) were assessed. A second sample (n=440), composed of 220 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia or hypertension and 220 without such diagnoses, was used to assess measurement invariance and convergent validity with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Results: The two-factor model showed the best psychometric indicators. Factor 1 (emotional engagement) showed alpha=0.72; ordinal alpha=0.75; omega=0.78, and Factor 2 (emotional avoidance) showed alpha=0.80; ordinal alpha=0.83; omega=0.84. Good fit indices were obtained: CFI=0.986; TLI=0.974; SRMR=0.064; RMSEA=0.078 (90% CI: 0.054–0.097). Measurement invariance was weak between groups (M1 M2=0.003; M2–M3=0.007; M3–M4=0.033). A direct and significant correlation was found between Factor 2 and anxiety (rho=0.325; p<0.001), and an inverse significant correlation with Factor 1 (rho=–0.162; p<0.050). Conclusion: The six-item, two-factor CSI-FV shows adequate validity, reliability, and clinical sensitivity to assess emotional coping strategies in hospitalized patients.