INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO
Descripción del Articulo
The plagues in the camu camu, are manifested in the different productive stages, not being an exception in the nursery and in the initial plantation, leading to a decrease in productivity over time. The objective in this work was to determine the incidence of Tuthillia cognata, in foliar shoots of c...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
Institución: | Instituto de investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana |
Repositorio: | Folia Amazónica |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/450 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/450 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Camu camu piojo saltador comparativo resistencia susceptibilidad jumping louse comparative resistance susceptibility |
id |
REVIIAP_86dd471f6fa0ba7609bf594ab0e6cf1d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/450 |
network_acronym_str |
REVIIAP |
network_name_str |
Folia Amazónica |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO EVALUACIÓN DE INCIDENCIA DE Tuthillia cognata Hodkinson EN BROTES FOLIARES DE PLANTAS JUVENILES DE 43 PROGENIES DE CAMU CAMU [Myrciaria dubia H.B.K Mc Vauhg (Myrtaceae)] EN LORETO, PERU |
title |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO |
spellingShingle |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO PAREDES DÁVILA, Elvis Javier Camu camu piojo saltador comparativo resistencia susceptibilidad Camu camu jumping louse comparative resistance susceptibility |
title_short |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO |
title_full |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO |
title_fullStr |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO |
title_full_unstemmed |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO |
title_sort |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETO |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
PAREDES DÁVILA, Elvis Javier PINEDO PANDURO, Mario BARDALES-LOZANO, Ricardo |
author |
PAREDES DÁVILA, Elvis Javier |
author_facet |
PAREDES DÁVILA, Elvis Javier PINEDO PANDURO, Mario BARDALES-LOZANO, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
PINEDO PANDURO, Mario BARDALES-LOZANO, Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Camu camu piojo saltador comparativo resistencia susceptibilidad Camu camu jumping louse comparative resistance susceptibility |
topic |
Camu camu piojo saltador comparativo resistencia susceptibilidad Camu camu jumping louse comparative resistance susceptibility |
description |
The plagues in the camu camu, are manifested in the different productive stages, not being an exception in the nursery and in the initial plantation, leading to a decrease in productivity over time. The objective in this work was to determine the incidence of Tuthillia cognata, in foliar shoots of camu camu plants of 3 years of sowing in final field, to know the potential of resistance or susceptibility within a genetic test of 43 progenies. The number of foliar sprouts / plant and the percentage of leaf shoots with damage by T. cognata were evaluated. Variance analysis and statistical tests were performed on means of data (Tukey and Scott & Knott at 5% probability). Statistical differences in the variance between progenies (p≤0.05) were determined for "number of leaf shoots" and "percentage of leaf shoots with damage". Evidencing that the plants with the highest number of leaf buds emitted do not present the greatest damage due to the plague studied, other factors (genetic and physiological) may possibly exist between progenies that cause the phenotypic manifestation of the variables to be different in each case. its resistance or susceptibility to the plague. According to resistance to T. cognata, clone 48 and 02-15-05 with 0% of damaged leaf buds, in addition to the progenies 15-14-07, 06-15-09, clone 29, and 15-06, stood out. -13 with values lower than 2.5%. By contrast, greater susceptibility was observed in progenies 15-04-8, 14-11-7, |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles Artículos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/450 10.24841/fa.v27i2.450 |
url |
https://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/450 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24841/fa.v27i2.450 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/450/519 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2019 Elvis Javier PAREDES DÁVILA, Mario PINEDO PANDURO, Ricardo BARDALES-LOZANO info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2019 Elvis Javier PAREDES DÁVILA, Mario PINEDO PANDURO, Ricardo BARDALES-LOZANO |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Folia Amazonica; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2018); 179-191 Folia Amazónica; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2018); 179-191 Folia Amazónica; v. 27 n. 2 (2018); 179-191 2410-1184 1018-5674 10.24841/fa.v27i2 reponame:Folia Amazónica instname:Instituto de investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana instacron:IIAP |
instname_str |
Instituto de investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana |
instacron_str |
IIAP |
institution |
IIAP |
reponame_str |
Folia Amazónica |
collection |
Folia Amazónica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1845792568426627072 |
spelling |
INCIDENCE OF Tuthillia cognata (Hodkinson) IN FOLIAR SPROUT OF 43 PROGENIES OF Myrciaria dubia-Myrtaceae, IN LORETOEVALUACIÓN DE INCIDENCIA DE Tuthillia cognata Hodkinson EN BROTES FOLIARES DE PLANTAS JUVENILES DE 43 PROGENIES DE CAMU CAMU [Myrciaria dubia H.B.K Mc Vauhg (Myrtaceae)] EN LORETO, PERUPAREDES DÁVILA, Elvis JavierPINEDO PANDURO, MarioBARDALES-LOZANO, RicardoCamu camupiojo saltadorcomparativoresistenciasusceptibilidadCamu camujumping lousecomparativeresistancesusceptibility The plagues in the camu camu, are manifested in the different productive stages, not being an exception in the nursery and in the initial plantation, leading to a decrease in productivity over time. The objective in this work was to determine the incidence of Tuthillia cognata, in foliar shoots of camu camu plants of 3 years of sowing in final field, to know the potential of resistance or susceptibility within a genetic test of 43 progenies. The number of foliar sprouts / plant and the percentage of leaf shoots with damage by T. cognata were evaluated. Variance analysis and statistical tests were performed on means of data (Tukey and Scott & Knott at 5% probability). Statistical differences in the variance between progenies (p≤0.05) were determined for "number of leaf shoots" and "percentage of leaf shoots with damage". Evidencing that the plants with the highest number of leaf buds emitted do not present the greatest damage due to the plague studied, other factors (genetic and physiological) may possibly exist between progenies that cause the phenotypic manifestation of the variables to be different in each case. its resistance or susceptibility to the plague. According to resistance to T. cognata, clone 48 and 02-15-05 with 0% of damaged leaf buds, in addition to the progenies 15-14-07, 06-15-09, clone 29, and 15-06, stood out. -13 with values lower than 2.5%. By contrast, greater susceptibility was observed in progenies 15-04-8, 14-11-7, Las plagas en el camu camu, se manifiestan en las distintas etapas productivas, no siendo excepción en vivero y en plantación inicial, conllevando en el tiempo a la baja de la productividad. El objetivo en este trabajo fue determinar la incidencia de Tuthillia cognata, en brotes foliares de plantas de camu camu de 3 años de sembradas en campo definitivo, para conocer el potencial de resistencia o susceptibilidad dentro de un ensayo genético de 43 progenies. Se evaluaron el número de brotes foliares/planta y el porcentaje de brotes foliares con daños por T. cognata. Se realizó el análisis de la varianza y pruebas estadísticas de medias de los datos (Tukey y Scott & Knott al 5% de probabilidad). Se determinaron diferencias estadísticas de la varianza entre progenies (p≤0,05) para “número de brotes foliares” y “porcentaje de brotes foliares con daños”. Evidenciándose, que las plantas con mayor número de brotes foliares emitidos, no presentan los mayores daños por la plaga estudiada, posiblemente existan otros factores (genéticos y fisiológicos) entre progenies que hacen que la manifestación fenotípica de las variables sea distinta en unas y otras por su resistencia o susceptibilidad a la plaga. Según la resistencia a T. cognata destacaron, el clon 48 y la 15-02-05 con 0% de brotes foliares dañados, además de las progenies 15-14-07, 15-06-09, clon 29, y 15-06-13 con valores menores al 2,5%. Por el contrario, mayor susceptibilidad se observó en las progenies 15-04-8, 14-11-7, 15-11-1, 14-17-7 y PC0504, superando el 10,5% de brotes foliares con daños.Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana2018-12-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtículosapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/45010.24841/fa.v27i2.450Folia Amazonica; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2018); 179-191Folia Amazónica; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2018); 179-191Folia Amazónica; v. 27 n. 2 (2018); 179-1912410-11841018-567410.24841/fa.v27i2reponame:Folia Amazónicainstname:Instituto de investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruanainstacron:IIAPspahttps://revistas.iiap.gob.pe/index.php/foliaamazonica/article/view/450/519Derechos de autor 2019 Elvis Javier PAREDES DÁVILA, Mario PINEDO PANDURO, Ricardo BARDALES-LOZANOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4502025-04-15T18:12:20Z |
score |
13.02468 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).