Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.

Descripción del Articulo

The authors analyze the suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when a judicial process is pending, taking as a reference the administrative procedure through which the prohibition of using outsourcing for activities that make up the "core business" is ques...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Maraví Sumar, Milagros, Llacza Romero, Sheyla
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Universidad de Piura
Repositorio:Revista de Derecho
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/3825
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Decreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TR
tercerización laboral
barreras burocráticas
suspensión de procedimiento
proceso judicial
Supreme Decree N° 001-2022-TR
labor outsourcing
bureaucratic barriers
suspension of administrative procedure
judicial process
id REVDE_cbaffc423bad2c8d3c4b8ebaecd9937d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/3825
network_acronym_str REVDE
network_name_str Revista de Derecho
repository_id_str
spelling Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.La suspensión del procedimiento de eliminación de barreras burocráticas cuando se encuentra en trámite un proceso judicial: A propósito del cuestionamiento relativo a la prohibición de utilizar la tercerización laboral para las actividades que comprenden el “núcleo de negocio”Maraví Sumar, MilagrosLlacza Romero, SheylaDecreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TRtercerización laboralbarreras burocráticassuspensión de procedimientoproceso judicialSupreme Decree N° 001-2022-TRlabor outsourcingbureaucratic barrierssuspension of administrative procedurejudicial processThe authors analyze the suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when a judicial process is pending, taking as a reference the administrative procedure through which the prohibition of using outsourcing for activities that make up the "core business" is questioned. In this regard, they explain the reasons why it is considered that the mere existence of a pending judicial process should not justify the suspension of the administrative procedure, provided that the administrative authority has elements that allow it to prove that, regardless of what is resolved in judicial proceeding, an illegal and/or unreasonable bureaucratic barrier has been established that must be disapplied in favor of citizens and economic agents in the country.Este artículo analiza la suspensión del procedimiento de eliminación de barreras burocráticas cuando se encuentra en trámite un proceso judicial, teniendo como referencia el procedimiento por medio del cual se cuestiona la prohibición de utilizar la tercerización laboral para las actividades que comprenden el “núcleo de negocio”. De esta manera, se explica las razones por las cuales se considera que la sola existencia de un proceso judicial en trámite no debería justificar la suspensión del procedimiento, siempre y cuando la autoridad administrativa cuente con elementos que permitan evidenciar que, independientemente de lo que se resuelva en la vía jurisdiccional, se ha constituido una barrera burocrática ilegal y/o carente de razonabilidad que requiere ser inaplicada a favor de los administrados y agentes económicos en el país.Universidad de Piura2024-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/382510.26441/RD24.1-2024-AR4Revista de Derecho; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024); 123-174Revista de Derecho; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2024); 123-1742664-36691608-1714reponame:Revista de Derechoinstname:Universidad de Piurainstacron:UDEPspahttps://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825/2883Derechos de autor 2024 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/38252025-06-27T02:27:59Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
La suspensión del procedimiento de eliminación de barreras burocráticas cuando se encuentra en trámite un proceso judicial: A propósito del cuestionamiento relativo a la prohibición de utilizar la tercerización laboral para las actividades que comprenden el “núcleo de negocio”
title Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
spellingShingle Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
Maraví Sumar, Milagros
Decreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TR
tercerización laboral
barreras burocráticas
suspensión de procedimiento
proceso judicial
Supreme Decree N° 001-2022-TR
labor outsourcing
bureaucratic barriers
suspension of administrative procedure
judicial process
title_short Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
title_full Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
title_fullStr Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
title_full_unstemmed Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
title_sort Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Maraví Sumar, Milagros
Llacza Romero, Sheyla
author Maraví Sumar, Milagros
author_facet Maraví Sumar, Milagros
Llacza Romero, Sheyla
author_role author
author2 Llacza Romero, Sheyla
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Decreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TR
tercerización laboral
barreras burocráticas
suspensión de procedimiento
proceso judicial
Supreme Decree N° 001-2022-TR
labor outsourcing
bureaucratic barriers
suspension of administrative procedure
judicial process
topic Decreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TR
tercerización laboral
barreras burocráticas
suspensión de procedimiento
proceso judicial
Supreme Decree N° 001-2022-TR
labor outsourcing
bureaucratic barriers
suspension of administrative procedure
judicial process
description The authors analyze the suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when a judicial process is pending, taking as a reference the administrative procedure through which the prohibition of using outsourcing for activities that make up the "core business" is questioned. In this regard, they explain the reasons why it is considered that the mere existence of a pending judicial process should not justify the suspension of the administrative procedure, provided that the administrative authority has elements that allow it to prove that, regardless of what is resolved in judicial proceeding, an illegal and/or unreasonable bureaucratic barrier has been established that must be disapplied in favor of citizens and economic agents in the country.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825
10.26441/RD24.1-2024-AR4
url https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825
identifier_str_mv 10.26441/RD24.1-2024-AR4
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825/2883
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Revista de Derecho
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Revista de Derecho
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Piura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Piura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024); 123-174
Revista de Derecho; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2024); 123-174
2664-3669
1608-1714
reponame:Revista de Derecho
instname:Universidad de Piura
instacron:UDEP
instname_str Universidad de Piura
instacron_str UDEP
institution UDEP
reponame_str Revista de Derecho
collection Revista de Derecho
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1852685994777640960
score 13.926661
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).