Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.
Descripción del Articulo
The authors analyze the suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when a judicial process is pending, taking as a reference the administrative procedure through which the prohibition of using outsourcing for activities that make up the "core business" is ques...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
| Institución: | Universidad de Piura |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Derecho |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/3825 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Decreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TR tercerización laboral barreras burocráticas suspensión de procedimiento proceso judicial Supreme Decree N° 001-2022-TR labor outsourcing bureaucratic barriers suspension of administrative procedure judicial process |
| id |
REVDE_cbaffc423bad2c8d3c4b8ebaecd9937d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/3825 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVDE |
| network_name_str |
Revista de Derecho |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”.La suspensión del procedimiento de eliminación de barreras burocráticas cuando se encuentra en trámite un proceso judicial: A propósito del cuestionamiento relativo a la prohibición de utilizar la tercerización laboral para las actividades que comprenden el “núcleo de negocio”Maraví Sumar, MilagrosLlacza Romero, SheylaDecreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TRtercerización laboralbarreras burocráticassuspensión de procedimientoproceso judicialSupreme Decree N° 001-2022-TRlabor outsourcingbureaucratic barrierssuspension of administrative procedurejudicial processThe authors analyze the suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when a judicial process is pending, taking as a reference the administrative procedure through which the prohibition of using outsourcing for activities that make up the "core business" is questioned. In this regard, they explain the reasons why it is considered that the mere existence of a pending judicial process should not justify the suspension of the administrative procedure, provided that the administrative authority has elements that allow it to prove that, regardless of what is resolved in judicial proceeding, an illegal and/or unreasonable bureaucratic barrier has been established that must be disapplied in favor of citizens and economic agents in the country.Este artículo analiza la suspensión del procedimiento de eliminación de barreras burocráticas cuando se encuentra en trámite un proceso judicial, teniendo como referencia el procedimiento por medio del cual se cuestiona la prohibición de utilizar la tercerización laboral para las actividades que comprenden el “núcleo de negocio”. De esta manera, se explica las razones por las cuales se considera que la sola existencia de un proceso judicial en trámite no debería justificar la suspensión del procedimiento, siempre y cuando la autoridad administrativa cuente con elementos que permitan evidenciar que, independientemente de lo que se resuelva en la vía jurisdiccional, se ha constituido una barrera burocrática ilegal y/o carente de razonabilidad que requiere ser inaplicada a favor de los administrados y agentes económicos en el país.Universidad de Piura2024-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/382510.26441/RD24.1-2024-AR4Revista de Derecho; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024); 123-174Revista de Derecho; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2024); 123-1742664-36691608-1714reponame:Revista de Derechoinstname:Universidad de Piurainstacron:UDEPspahttps://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825/2883Derechos de autor 2024 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/38252025-06-27T02:27:59Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”. La suspensión del procedimiento de eliminación de barreras burocráticas cuando se encuentra en trámite un proceso judicial: A propósito del cuestionamiento relativo a la prohibición de utilizar la tercerización laboral para las actividades que comprenden el “núcleo de negocio” |
| title |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”. |
| spellingShingle |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”. Maraví Sumar, Milagros Decreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TR tercerización laboral barreras burocráticas suspensión de procedimiento proceso judicial Supreme Decree N° 001-2022-TR labor outsourcing bureaucratic barriers suspension of administrative procedure judicial process |
| title_short |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”. |
| title_full |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”. |
| title_fullStr |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”. |
| title_sort |
Suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when legal proceedings are in progress: Regarding the questioning of the prohibition on the use of labor outsourcing for the activities that comprise the “core business”. |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Maraví Sumar, Milagros Llacza Romero, Sheyla |
| author |
Maraví Sumar, Milagros |
| author_facet |
Maraví Sumar, Milagros Llacza Romero, Sheyla |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Llacza Romero, Sheyla |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Decreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TR tercerización laboral barreras burocráticas suspensión de procedimiento proceso judicial Supreme Decree N° 001-2022-TR labor outsourcing bureaucratic barriers suspension of administrative procedure judicial process |
| topic |
Decreto Supremo N° 001-2022-TR tercerización laboral barreras burocráticas suspensión de procedimiento proceso judicial Supreme Decree N° 001-2022-TR labor outsourcing bureaucratic barriers suspension of administrative procedure judicial process |
| description |
The authors analyze the suspension of the procedure for the elimination of bureaucratic barriers when a judicial process is pending, taking as a reference the administrative procedure through which the prohibition of using outsourcing for activities that make up the "core business" is questioned. In this regard, they explain the reasons why it is considered that the mere existence of a pending judicial process should not justify the suspension of the administrative procedure, provided that the administrative authority has elements that allow it to prove that, regardless of what is resolved in judicial proceeding, an illegal and/or unreasonable bureaucratic barrier has been established that must be disapplied in favor of citizens and economic agents in the country. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-04 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825 10.26441/RD24.1-2024-AR4 |
| url |
https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.26441/RD24.1-2024-AR4 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/3825/2883 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista de Derecho info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista de Derecho |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Derecho; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024); 123-174 Revista de Derecho; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2024); 123-174 2664-3669 1608-1714 reponame:Revista de Derecho instname:Universidad de Piura instacron:UDEP |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Piura |
| instacron_str |
UDEP |
| institution |
UDEP |
| reponame_str |
Revista de Derecho |
| collection |
Revista de Derecho |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1852685994777640960 |
| score |
13.926661 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).