It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism

Descripción del Articulo

In this paper the prohibition of capitalization of interest is analyzed in light of the recent binding jurisprudence of the Supreme Court (Cassations No 5128-2013-Lima and 2402-2012-Lambayeque, Sixth Civil Casatory Plenary) and the Constitutional Court (Resolution on Process No 214-2014-PA / TC), qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/240
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:money
loans
interest
anatocism
capitalization
dinero
crédito
interés
anatocismo
capitalización
id REVCSJ_526546c96ff531448089f032ad19ba35
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/240
network_acronym_str REVCSJ
network_name_str Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism¡No estaba muerta, andaba descansando! Notas a la jurisprudencia vinculante y el anatocismoPolanco Gutiérrez, Carlos EnriquemoneyloansinterestanatocismcapitalizationdinerocréditointerésanatocismocapitalizaciónIn this paper the prohibition of capitalization of interest is analyzed in light of the recent binding jurisprudence of the Supreme Court (Cassations No 5128-2013-Lima and 2402-2012-Lambayeque, Sixth Civil Casatory Plenary) and the Constitutional Court (Resolution on Process No 214-2014-PA / TC), questioning whether that prohibition is, as noted by the Highest Courts in force or, on the contrary, in accordance with Circular No 021-2007-BCRP issued by the Central Reserve Bank that regulates the rate of interest applicable to people outside the financial system, the capitalization of interest is allowed.             The article makes an analysis of the contradictions that arise in our legal system, from an analytical-historical-doctrinal point of view, and questions about the convenience of starting a debate to repeal, modify or not art. 1249 of the Civil Code that prohibits anatocism, considering that such a rule would harm not only the debtor, but also the creditor, by making credit more expensive between individuals.En el presente trabajo se analiza la prohibición de la capitalización de intereses tomando en cuenta reciente jurisprudencia vinculante de la Corte Suprema (Casaciones N.os 5128-2013-Lima y 2402-2012-Lambayeque, Sexto Pleno Casatorio Civil) y Tribunal Constitucional (Resolución en el Expediente N.o 214-2014-PA/TC), cuestionando si dicha prohibición es, como lo señalan los máximos Tribunales, vigente; o si, por el contrario, conforme a la Circular N.o 021-2007-BCRP, expedida por el Banco Central de Reserva y que regula la tasa de interés aplicable a personas ajenas al sistema financiero, la capitalización de intereses está permitida. En el artículo se efectúa un análisis sobre las contradicciones que se presentan en nuestro sistema jurídico, desde un punto de vista analítico-histórico-doctrinario, y se cuestiona sobre la conveniencia de iniciar un debate para derogar, modificar o no el art. 1249 del Código Civil que prohíbe el anatocismo, considerando que tal norma perjudicaría no solo al deudor, sino también al acreedor, al encarecer el crédito entre particulares.Poder Judicial del Perú2016-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/24010.35292/ropj.v8i10.240Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 8 Núm. 10 (2016); 305-3372663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v8i10reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstacron:CSJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240/295Derechos de autor 2016 Carlos Enrique Polanco Gutiérrezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/2402023-05-11T18:17:28Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
¡No estaba muerta, andaba descansando! Notas a la jurisprudencia vinculante y el anatocismo
title It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
spellingShingle It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique
money
loans
interest
anatocism
capitalization
dinero
crédito
interés
anatocismo
capitalización
title_short It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
title_full It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
title_fullStr It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
title_full_unstemmed It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
title_sort It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique
author Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique
author_facet Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv money
loans
interest
anatocism
capitalization
dinero
crédito
interés
anatocismo
capitalización
topic money
loans
interest
anatocism
capitalization
dinero
crédito
interés
anatocismo
capitalización
description In this paper the prohibition of capitalization of interest is analyzed in light of the recent binding jurisprudence of the Supreme Court (Cassations No 5128-2013-Lima and 2402-2012-Lambayeque, Sixth Civil Casatory Plenary) and the Constitutional Court (Resolution on Process No 214-2014-PA / TC), questioning whether that prohibition is, as noted by the Highest Courts in force or, on the contrary, in accordance with Circular No 021-2007-BCRP issued by the Central Reserve Bank that regulates the rate of interest applicable to people outside the financial system, the capitalization of interest is allowed.             The article makes an analysis of the contradictions that arise in our legal system, from an analytical-historical-doctrinal point of view, and questions about the convenience of starting a debate to repeal, modify or not art. 1249 of the Civil Code that prohibits anatocism, considering that such a rule would harm not only the debtor, but also the creditor, by making credit more expensive between individuals.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240
10.35292/ropj.v8i10.240
url https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240
identifier_str_mv 10.35292/ropj.v8i10.240
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240/295
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Carlos Enrique Polanco Gutiérrez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Carlos Enrique Polanco Gutiérrez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 8 Núm. 10 (2016); 305-337
2663-9130
1997-6682
10.35292/ropj.v8i10
reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instacron:CSJ
instname_str Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instacron_str CSJ
institution CSJ
reponame_str Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
collection Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846524196350328832
score 13.135628
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).