It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism
Descripción del Articulo
In this paper the prohibition of capitalization of interest is analyzed in light of the recent binding jurisprudence of the Supreme Court (Cassations No 5128-2013-Lima and 2402-2012-Lambayeque, Sixth Civil Casatory Plenary) and the Constitutional Court (Resolution on Process No 214-2014-PA / TC), qu...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2016 |
Institución: | Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/240 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | money loans interest anatocism capitalization dinero crédito interés anatocismo capitalización |
id |
REVCSJ_526546c96ff531448089f032ad19ba35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/240 |
network_acronym_str |
REVCSJ |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism¡No estaba muerta, andaba descansando! Notas a la jurisprudencia vinculante y el anatocismoPolanco Gutiérrez, Carlos EnriquemoneyloansinterestanatocismcapitalizationdinerocréditointerésanatocismocapitalizaciónIn this paper the prohibition of capitalization of interest is analyzed in light of the recent binding jurisprudence of the Supreme Court (Cassations No 5128-2013-Lima and 2402-2012-Lambayeque, Sixth Civil Casatory Plenary) and the Constitutional Court (Resolution on Process No 214-2014-PA / TC), questioning whether that prohibition is, as noted by the Highest Courts in force or, on the contrary, in accordance with Circular No 021-2007-BCRP issued by the Central Reserve Bank that regulates the rate of interest applicable to people outside the financial system, the capitalization of interest is allowed. The article makes an analysis of the contradictions that arise in our legal system, from an analytical-historical-doctrinal point of view, and questions about the convenience of starting a debate to repeal, modify or not art. 1249 of the Civil Code that prohibits anatocism, considering that such a rule would harm not only the debtor, but also the creditor, by making credit more expensive between individuals.En el presente trabajo se analiza la prohibición de la capitalización de intereses tomando en cuenta reciente jurisprudencia vinculante de la Corte Suprema (Casaciones N.os 5128-2013-Lima y 2402-2012-Lambayeque, Sexto Pleno Casatorio Civil) y Tribunal Constitucional (Resolución en el Expediente N.o 214-2014-PA/TC), cuestionando si dicha prohibición es, como lo señalan los máximos Tribunales, vigente; o si, por el contrario, conforme a la Circular N.o 021-2007-BCRP, expedida por el Banco Central de Reserva y que regula la tasa de interés aplicable a personas ajenas al sistema financiero, la capitalización de intereses está permitida. En el artículo se efectúa un análisis sobre las contradicciones que se presentan en nuestro sistema jurídico, desde un punto de vista analítico-histórico-doctrinario, y se cuestiona sobre la conveniencia de iniciar un debate para derogar, modificar o no el art. 1249 del Código Civil que prohíbe el anatocismo, considerando que tal norma perjudicaría no solo al deudor, sino también al acreedor, al encarecer el crédito entre particulares.Poder Judicial del Perú2016-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/24010.35292/ropj.v8i10.240Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 8 Núm. 10 (2016); 305-3372663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v8i10reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstacron:CSJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240/295Derechos de autor 2016 Carlos Enrique Polanco Gutiérrezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/2402023-05-11T18:17:28Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism ¡No estaba muerta, andaba descansando! Notas a la jurisprudencia vinculante y el anatocismo |
title |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism |
spellingShingle |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique money loans interest anatocism capitalization dinero crédito interés anatocismo capitalización |
title_short |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism |
title_full |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism |
title_fullStr |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism |
title_full_unstemmed |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism |
title_sort |
It was not dead, it was resting! Notes to binding jurisprudence and anatocism |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique |
author |
Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique |
author_facet |
Polanco Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
money loans interest anatocism capitalization dinero crédito interés anatocismo capitalización |
topic |
money loans interest anatocism capitalization dinero crédito interés anatocismo capitalización |
description |
In this paper the prohibition of capitalization of interest is analyzed in light of the recent binding jurisprudence of the Supreme Court (Cassations No 5128-2013-Lima and 2402-2012-Lambayeque, Sixth Civil Casatory Plenary) and the Constitutional Court (Resolution on Process No 214-2014-PA / TC), questioning whether that prohibition is, as noted by the Highest Courts in force or, on the contrary, in accordance with Circular No 021-2007-BCRP issued by the Central Reserve Bank that regulates the rate of interest applicable to people outside the financial system, the capitalization of interest is allowed. The article makes an analysis of the contradictions that arise in our legal system, from an analytical-historical-doctrinal point of view, and questions about the convenience of starting a debate to repeal, modify or not art. 1249 of the Civil Code that prohibits anatocism, considering that such a rule would harm not only the debtor, but also the creditor, by making credit more expensive between individuals. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240 10.35292/ropj.v8i10.240 |
url |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35292/ropj.v8i10.240 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/240/295 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Carlos Enrique Polanco Gutiérrez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Carlos Enrique Polanco Gutiérrez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 8 Núm. 10 (2016); 305-337 2663-9130 1997-6682 10.35292/ropj.v8i10 reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú instname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú instacron:CSJ |
instname_str |
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
instacron_str |
CSJ |
institution |
CSJ |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1846524196350328832 |
score |
13.135628 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).