Comparison of linezolid regimens, in addition to bedaquiline and pretomanid, for the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis (the ZeNix study): Critical reading

Descripción del Articulo

Presentation: In this article we present our critical appraisal of a randomized clinical trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2022. Study conclusions: The study compares four linezolid regimens (in addition to bedaquiline and pretomanid) for the management of drug-resistant tube...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Zela-Coila, Frank, Cabrera-Cruzado, Carlos, Baquerizo-Quispe, Nicole Stephanie, Alvarez-Vilchez, Margarita Liz, Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo
Repositorio:Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:cmhnaaa_ojs_cmhnaaa.cmhnaaa.org.pe:article/1800
Enlace del recurso:https://cmhnaaa.org.pe/ojs/index.php/rcmhnaaa/article/view/1800
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Tuberculosis Extensivamente Resistente a Drogas
Bedaquilina
Pretomanida
Linezolid
Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis
Bedaquiline
Pretomanid
Descripción
Sumario:Presentation: In this article we present our critical appraisal of a randomized clinical trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2022. Study conclusions: The study compares four linezolid regimens (in addition to bedaquiline and pretomanid) for the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Finally, it shows that the regimen of 600 mg of linezolid for 26 weeks had less frequency of therapeutic failure and adverse events (compared to giving it for fewer weeks or at higher doses). Critical comment: The article is relevant because the appropriate dose of linezolid and duration of treatment with this agent to minimize adverse effects and maintain efficacy against highly resistant tuberculosis is still unclear. Despite some limitations such as low number of participants, high loss to follow-up, and no statistical comparisons between groups, the results are relatively reliable for decision making.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).