Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

Descripción del Articulo

Background: First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Sun, JM, Shen, L, Shah, MA, Enzinger, P, Adenis, A, Doi, T, Kojima, T, Metges, JP, Li, Z, Kim, SB, Cho, BC, Mansoor, W, Li, SH, Sunpaweravong, P, Maqueda, MA, Goekkurt, E, Hara, H, Antunes, L, Fountzilas, C, Tsuji, A, Castro-Oliden, V, Liu Q, Shah S, Bhagia P, Kato K, KEYNOTE-590 Investigators.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas
Repositorio:INEN-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.inen.sld.pe:inen/153
Enlace del recurso:https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/handle/inen/153
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Pembrolizumab
Gastric cancer
HER2-negative
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21
id INEN_c856e9996e70b35fd5fc1f3977b159bc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.inen.sld.pe:inen/153
network_acronym_str INEN
network_name_str INEN-Institucional
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
title Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
spellingShingle Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
Sun, JM
Pembrolizumab
Gastric cancer
HER2-negative
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21
title_short Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
title_full Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
title_fullStr Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
title_full_unstemmed Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
title_sort Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
author Sun, JM
author_facet Sun, JM
Shen, L
Shah, MA
Enzinger, P
Adenis, A
Doi, T
Kojima, T
Metges, JP
Li, Z
Kim, SB
Cho, BC
Mansoor, W
Li, SH
Sunpaweravong, P
Maqueda, MA
Goekkurt, E
Hara, H
Antunes, L
Fountzilas, C
Tsuji, A
Castro-Oliden, V
Liu Q
Shah S
Bhagia P
Kato K
KEYNOTE-590 Investigators.
author_role author
author2 Shen, L
Shah, MA
Enzinger, P
Adenis, A
Doi, T
Kojima, T
Metges, JP
Li, Z
Kim, SB
Cho, BC
Mansoor, W
Li, SH
Sunpaweravong, P
Maqueda, MA
Goekkurt, E
Hara, H
Antunes, L
Fountzilas, C
Tsuji, A
Castro-Oliden, V
Liu Q
Shah S
Bhagia P
Kato K
KEYNOTE-590 Investigators.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sun, JM
Shen, L
Shah, MA
Enzinger, P
Adenis, A
Doi, T
Kojima, T
Metges, JP
Li, Z
Kim, SB
Cho, BC
Mansoor, W
Li, SH
Sunpaweravong, P
Maqueda, MA
Goekkurt, E
Hara, H
Antunes, L
Fountzilas, C
Tsuji, A
Castro-Oliden, V
Liu Q
Shah S
Bhagia P
Kato K
KEYNOTE-590 Investigators.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Pembrolizumab
Gastric cancer
HER2-negative
topic Pembrolizumab
Gastric cancer
HER2-negative
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21
description Background: First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer and Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Methods: We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study across 168 medical centres in 26 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 status), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (chemotherapy), once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, histology, and performance status. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to group assignment and PD-L1 biomarker status. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719, and is closed to recruitment. Findings: Between July 25, 2017, and June 3, 2019, 1020 patients were screened and 749 were enrolled and randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=373 [50%]) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=376 [50%]). At the first interim analysis (median follow-up of 22·6 months), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (median 13·9 months vs 8·8 months; hazard ratio 0·57 [95% CI 0·43-0·75]; p<0·0001), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (12·6 months vs 9·8 months; 0·72 [0·60-0·88]; p=0·0006), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (13·5 months vs 9·4 months; 0·62 [0·49-0·78]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (12·4 months vs 9·8 months; 0·73 [0·62-0·86]; p<0·0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·54-0·78]; p<0·0001), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (7·5 months vs 5·5 months; 0·51 [0·41-0·65]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·55-0·76]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 266 (72%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 250 (68%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Interpretation: Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated, advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients regardless of histology, and had a manageable safety profile in the total as-treated population.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-08-29T16:05:26Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-08-29T16:05:26Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/handle/inen/153
identifier_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4
url https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/handle/inen/153
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier BV
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv dc.rights.uri: https//creativecomons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv dc.rights.uri: https//creativecomons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lancet
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv GB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lancet
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:INEN-Institucional
instname:Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas
instacron:INEN
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas
instacron_str INEN
institution INEN
reponame_str INEN-Institucional
collection INEN-Institucional
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/bitstreams/94fc62a1-7119-4755-bae9-e4e8bc062a86/download
https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/bitstreams/b8053da7-d467-43fc-8ef2-22703acf5b6f/download
https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/bitstreams/3724200a-f612-486a-8713-f111c763860b/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cf687fa5152ef4da4626a73e2c62b207
66a6566ac83c462f7ac9a2958b4d6a67
ab24975c2ab3de35acd35c82c30eed9e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio INEN
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorioinendspace@gmail.com
_version_ 1846876465029709824
spelling Sun, JMShen, LShah, MAEnzinger, PAdenis, ADoi, TKojima, TMetges, JPLi, ZKim, SBCho, BCMansoor, WLi, SHSunpaweravong, PMaqueda, MAGoekkurt, EHara, HAntunes, LFountzilas, CTsuji, ACastro-Oliden, VLiu QShah SBhagia PKato KKEYNOTE-590 Investigators.2024-08-29T16:05:26Z2024-08-29T16:05:26Z2021Background: First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer and Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Methods: We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study across 168 medical centres in 26 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 status), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (chemotherapy), once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, histology, and performance status. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to group assignment and PD-L1 biomarker status. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719, and is closed to recruitment. Findings: Between July 25, 2017, and June 3, 2019, 1020 patients were screened and 749 were enrolled and randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=373 [50%]) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=376 [50%]). At the first interim analysis (median follow-up of 22·6 months), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (median 13·9 months vs 8·8 months; hazard ratio 0·57 [95% CI 0·43-0·75]; p<0·0001), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (12·6 months vs 9·8 months; 0·72 [0·60-0·88]; p=0·0006), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (13·5 months vs 9·4 months; 0·62 [0·49-0·78]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (12·4 months vs 9·8 months; 0·73 [0·62-0·86]; p<0·0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·54-0·78]; p<0·0001), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (7·5 months vs 5·5 months; 0·51 [0·41-0·65]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·55-0·76]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 266 (72%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 250 (68%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Interpretation: Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated, advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients regardless of histology, and had a manageable safety profile in the total as-treated population.application/pdf10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/handle/inen/153engLancetGBElsevier BVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessdc.rights.uri: https//creativecomons.org/licenses/by/4.0/PembrolizumabGastric cancerHER2-negativehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:INEN-Institucionalinstname:Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicasinstacron:INENPublicationORIGINALSun 2021.pdfapplication/pdf92358https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/bitstreams/94fc62a1-7119-4755-bae9-e4e8bc062a86/downloadcf687fa5152ef4da4626a73e2c62b207MD51TEXTSun 2021.pdf.txtSun 2021.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain24244https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/bitstreams/b8053da7-d467-43fc-8ef2-22703acf5b6f/download66a6566ac83c462f7ac9a2958b4d6a67MD52THUMBNAILSun 2021.pdf.jpgSun 2021.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4471https://repositorio.inen.sld.pe/bitstreams/3724200a-f612-486a-8713-f111c763860b/downloadab24975c2ab3de35acd35c82c30eed9eMD53inen/153oai:repositorio.inen.sld.pe:inen/1532024-10-23 18:22:44.501dc.rights.uri: https//creativecomons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://repositorio.inen.sld.peRepositorio INENrepositorioinendspace@gmail.com
score 12.605999
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).