Echoes of the pandemic: Contrasting COVID-19 outbreaks in northern Peru

Descripción del Articulo

Peru reported the second-highest COVID-19 cases in Latin America, after Brazil. The first COVID-19 wave occurred between March–December 2020, and the second occurred between January–September 2021. The differences between these waves remain largely unknown, and there is no comparison between them in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pereira-Victorio, César Johan, Failoc-Rojas, Virgilio E., Alvarez-Risco, Aldo, Morocho-Alburqueque, Noelia, Plasencia-Dueñas, Rubi, Torres-Mera, Alicia, Vera-Ponce, Víctor J., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, Shyla, Yáñez, Jaime A., Valladares-Garrido, Mario J.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Seguro Social de Salud
Repositorio:ESSALUD-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.essalud.gob.pe:20.500.12959/5163
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12959/5163
https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e122087
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Covid-19
Pandemic waves
Epidemiology
Infection
Peru
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.08
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.09
Descripción
Sumario:Peru reported the second-highest COVID-19 cases in Latin America, after Brazil. The first COVID-19 wave occurred between March–December 2020, and the second occurred between January–September 2021. The differences between these waves remain largely unknown, and there is no comparison between them in Peru. We evaluated the variation in the clinical and epidemiological components of COVID-19-affected patients in both waves in northern Peru by a retrospective study using the clinical follow-up database of Lambayeque and the epidemiological notification form database of NotiWeb. The COVID-19-associated factors during the two waves were determined using simple and multiple regression analysis, and the prevalence ratio (PR) was estimated. During the second wave of COVID-19, there was an increase in cough symptoms in 12.1%, odynophagia in 5.0%, and chills in 16.0% compared with the first wave. The second wave was marked by a higher proportion of affected adolescents and children and a greater percentage of respiratory symptoms than the first wave.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).