Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software
Descripción del Articulo
The objective of the present study is to make a comparison between various free and open-source software used for medical image processing, such as 3D Slicer (version 4.11), ITK-Snap (version 3.8), and Invesalius (version 3.1) in its application for the calculation of solitary fibrous tumor volumes....
Autores: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Seguro Social de Salud |
Repositorio: | ESSALUD-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.essalud.gob.pe:20.500.12959/5082 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12959/5082 https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5060116 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Segmentation 3d print 3D slicer Fibrous tumor Software https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.07 |
id |
ESSA_59fc0840ad1bc4b0021b29807a3a07dc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.essalud.gob.pe:20.500.12959/5082 |
network_acronym_str |
ESSA |
network_name_str |
ESSALUD-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
4277 |
dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software |
title |
Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software Tincopa, Jean Pierre Segmentation 3d print 3D slicer Fibrous tumor Software https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.07 |
title_short |
Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software |
title_full |
Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software |
title_sort |
Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software |
author |
Tincopa, Jean Pierre |
author_facet |
Tincopa, Jean Pierre Salazar-Gamarra, Rodrigo Lopez-Hinostroza, Madaleine Moya-Salazar, Belén Contreras-Pulache, Hans Moya-Salazar, Jeel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salazar-Gamarra, Rodrigo Lopez-Hinostroza, Madaleine Moya-Salazar, Belén Contreras-Pulache, Hans Moya-Salazar, Jeel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tincopa, Jean Pierre Salazar-Gamarra, Rodrigo Lopez-Hinostroza, Madaleine Moya-Salazar, Belén Contreras-Pulache, Hans Moya-Salazar, Jeel |
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Segmentation 3d print 3D slicer Fibrous tumor Software |
topic |
Segmentation 3d print 3D slicer Fibrous tumor Software https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.07 |
dc.subject.ocde.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.07 |
description |
The objective of the present study is to make a comparison between various free and open-source software used for medical image processing, such as 3D Slicer (version 4.11), ITK-Snap (version 3.8), and Invesalius (version 3.1) in its application for the calculation of solitary fibrous tumor volumes. Knowing the size, shape, and volume of mesothelioma is decisive for clinical decision-making by health personnel when performing surgery; the currently used standard procedure is manual segmentation through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This process tends to take a long time to complete. On the other hand, automatic segmentation software is much faster and more user-friendly, so looking for software that gives us greater accuracy when doing this task is very important. This work obtained magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a mesothelioma patient, and the images were segmented in the 3 different programs to evaluate the concordance between the software later. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-31T18:04:00Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-31T18:04:00Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-21 |
dc.type.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
dc.identifier.citation.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Applied System Innovation. 2022:5(6). |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2571-5577 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12959/5082 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5060116 |
identifier_str_mv |
Applied System Innovation. 2022:5(6). 2571-5577 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12959/5082 https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5060116 |
dc.language.iso.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.uri.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-5577/5/6/116 |
dc.rights.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.uri.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
dc.format.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
MDPI AG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:ESSALUD-Institucional instname:Seguro Social de Salud instacron:ESSALUD |
instname_str |
Seguro Social de Salud |
instacron_str |
ESSALUD |
institution |
ESSALUD |
reponame_str |
ESSALUD-Institucional |
collection |
ESSALUD-Institucional |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.essalud.gob.pe/bitstream/20.500.12959/5082/1/Comparison%20of%20Models%20for%203D%20Printing%20of%20Solitary%20Fibrous%20Tumor%20Obtained%20Using%20Open-Source%20Segmentation%20Software.pdf https://repositorio.essalud.gob.pe/bitstream/20.500.12959/5082/2/license.txt https://repositorio.essalud.gob.pe/bitstream/20.500.12959/5082/3/Comparison%20of%20Models%20for%203D%20Printing%20of%20Solitary%20Fibrous%20Tumor%20Obtained%20Using%20Open-Source%20Segmentation%20Software.pdf.txt https://repositorio.essalud.gob.pe/bitstream/20.500.12959/5082/4/Comparison%20of%20Models%20for%203D%20Printing%20of%20Solitary%20Fibrous%20Tumor%20Obtained%20Using%20Open-Source%20Segmentation%20Software.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
a991860801ba267d8b51ef9320431473 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 f3a9ad82d8601635b3a5ff339d6e36a6 4faa9d821098401dcbad31c29c4b6ee1 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Seguro Social de Salud – ESSALUD |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecacentral@essalud.gob.pe |
_version_ |
1813537112801148928 |
spelling |
Tincopa, Jean PierreSalazar-Gamarra, RodrigoLopez-Hinostroza, MadaleineMoya-Salazar, BelénContreras-Pulache, HansMoya-Salazar, Jeel2024-07-31T18:04:00Z2024-07-31T18:04:00Z2022-11-21Applied System Innovation. 2022:5(6).2571-5577https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12959/5082https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5060116The objective of the present study is to make a comparison between various free and open-source software used for medical image processing, such as 3D Slicer (version 4.11), ITK-Snap (version 3.8), and Invesalius (version 3.1) in its application for the calculation of solitary fibrous tumor volumes. Knowing the size, shape, and volume of mesothelioma is decisive for clinical decision-making by health personnel when performing surgery; the currently used standard procedure is manual segmentation through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This process tends to take a long time to complete. On the other hand, automatic segmentation software is much faster and more user-friendly, so looking for software that gives us greater accuracy when doing this task is very important. This work obtained magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a mesothelioma patient, and the images were segmented in the 3 different programs to evaluate the concordance between the software later.application/pdfengMDPI AGhttps://www.mdpi.com/2571-5577/5/6/116info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Segmentation3d print3D slicerFibrous tumorSoftwarehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.07Comparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Softwareinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:ESSALUD-Institucionalinstname:Seguro Social de Saludinstacron:ESSALUDORIGINALComparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software.pdfComparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software.pdfapplication/pdf12182514https://repositorio.essalud.gob.pe/bitstream/20.500.12959/5082/1/Comparison%20of%20Models%20for%203D%20Printing%20of%20Solitary%20Fibrous%20Tumor%20Obtained%20Using%20Open-Source%20Segmentation%20Software.pdfa991860801ba267d8b51ef9320431473MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.essalud.gob.pe/bitstream/20.500.12959/5082/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXTComparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software.pdf.txtComparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain40792https://repositorio.essalud.gob.pe/bitstream/20.500.12959/5082/3/Comparison%20of%20Models%20for%203D%20Printing%20of%20Solitary%20Fibrous%20Tumor%20Obtained%20Using%20Open-Source%20Segmentation%20Software.pdf.txtf3a9ad82d8601635b3a5ff339d6e36a6MD53THUMBNAILComparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software.pdf.jpgComparison of Models for 3D Printing of Solitary Fibrous Tumor Obtained Using Open-Source Segmentation Software.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg7315https://repositorio.essalud.gob.pe/bitstream/20.500.12959/5082/4/Comparison%20of%20Models%20for%203D%20Printing%20of%20Solitary%20Fibrous%20Tumor%20Obtained%20Using%20Open-Source%20Segmentation%20Software.pdf.jpg4faa9d821098401dcbad31c29c4b6ee1MD5420.500.12959/5082oai:repositorio.essalud.gob.pe:20.500.12959/50822024-08-01 03:01:10.862Repositorio Seguro Social de Salud – ESSALUDbibliotecacentral@essalud.gob.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 |
score |
13.93557 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).