The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation

Descripción del Articulo

This article aims to analyze the effects of the recent Galetovic Sapunar et al. v. Chile judgment by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, particularly regarding the statute of limitations for indemnity actions arising from human rights violations that do not constitute crimes against humanity o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Farfán Saldaña, Gustavo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
Repositorio:CAL-Chornancap
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/120
Enlace del recurso:https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/120
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Derecho al recurso judicial efectivo
Prescripción extintiva
Violaciones de Derechos Humanos
Nulidad Administrativa
Responsabilidad del Estado
Right to an Effective Judicial Remedy
Extinctive Prescription
Violations of Human Rights
Administrative Annulment
State responsibility
id CAL-RChorn_cb896d1e13a41875eeb67c2ac23f928a
oai_identifier_str oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/120
network_acronym_str CAL-RChorn
network_name_str CAL-Chornancap
repository_id_str
spelling The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situationEl régimen de responsabilidad del Estado frente a los estándares fijados por la sentencia Galetovic Sapunar y Otros. Vs. Chile. Un análisis de la situación chilena Farfán Saldaña, GustavoDerecho al recurso judicial efectivoPrescripción extintivaViolaciones de Derechos HumanosNulidad AdministrativaResponsabilidad del EstadoRight to an Effective Judicial RemedyExtinctive PrescriptionViolations of Human RightsAdministrative AnnulmentState responsibilityThis article aims to analyze the effects of the recent Galetovic Sapunar et al. v. Chile judgment by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, particularly regarding the statute of limitations for indemnity actions arising from human rights violations that do not constitute crimes against humanity or are not considered serious human rights violations but are nonetheless attributable to the State. To this end, the article first examines the Galetovic Sapunar judgment and the standards established by the Court. Secondly, it reviews the prevailing approach in Chile concerning indemnity actions against the administration, with a particular focus on the rules governing extinctive prescription. Based on these two aspects, the article analyzes the necessary changes to ensure compliance with the judgment and align the domestic legal framework with the standard set by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.El presente artículo busca analizar los efectos de la reciente sentencia Galetovic Sapunar y Otros. Vs. Chile., de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, especialmente en materia de la prescripción de las acciones indemnizatorias derivadas de violaciones de derechos humanos que no constituyan crímenes contra la humanidad o que no se consideren graves violaciones a los derechos humanos, pero que sean imputables al Estado. Para ello, en primer lugar, se analiza la sentencia Galetovic Sapunar, así como los estándares fijados en ella por la Corte. En segundo término, se revisa el criterio actualmente imperante en Chile respecto de las acciones indemnizatorias contra la Administración, con especial enfoque en las reglas en materia de prescripción extintiva. En base a los dos puntos anteriores se analizan los cambios que se deberían realizar en cumplimiento de la sentencia, a fin de adecuar el régimen interno al estándar establecido por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2025-07-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/12010.61542/rjch.120Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): The dimension of equality in fundamental rights; 165-182Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2025): La dimensión de la igualdad en los derechos fundamentales; 165-1822961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v3i1reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/120/140https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1202025-12-30T20:46:47Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation
El régimen de responsabilidad del Estado frente a los estándares fijados por la sentencia Galetovic Sapunar y Otros. Vs. Chile. Un análisis de la situación chilena
title The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation
spellingShingle The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation
Farfán Saldaña, Gustavo
Derecho al recurso judicial efectivo
Prescripción extintiva
Violaciones de Derechos Humanos
Nulidad Administrativa
Responsabilidad del Estado
Right to an Effective Judicial Remedy
Extinctive Prescription
Violations of Human Rights
Administrative Annulment
State responsibility
title_short The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation
title_full The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation
title_fullStr The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation
title_full_unstemmed The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation
title_sort The State's liability regime in light of the standards set by the Galetovic Sapunar and Others v. Chile ruling. An analysis of the Chilean situation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Farfán Saldaña, Gustavo
author Farfán Saldaña, Gustavo
author_facet Farfán Saldaña, Gustavo
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Derecho al recurso judicial efectivo
Prescripción extintiva
Violaciones de Derechos Humanos
Nulidad Administrativa
Responsabilidad del Estado
Right to an Effective Judicial Remedy
Extinctive Prescription
Violations of Human Rights
Administrative Annulment
State responsibility
topic Derecho al recurso judicial efectivo
Prescripción extintiva
Violaciones de Derechos Humanos
Nulidad Administrativa
Responsabilidad del Estado
Right to an Effective Judicial Remedy
Extinctive Prescription
Violations of Human Rights
Administrative Annulment
State responsibility
description This article aims to analyze the effects of the recent Galetovic Sapunar et al. v. Chile judgment by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, particularly regarding the statute of limitations for indemnity actions arising from human rights violations that do not constitute crimes against humanity or are not considered serious human rights violations but are nonetheless attributable to the State. To this end, the article first examines the Galetovic Sapunar judgment and the standards established by the Court. Secondly, it reviews the prevailing approach in Chile concerning indemnity actions against the administration, with a particular focus on the rules governing extinctive prescription. Based on these two aspects, the article analyzes the necessary changes to ensure compliance with the judgment and align the domestic legal framework with the standard set by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-07-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/120
10.61542/rjch.120
url https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/120
identifier_str_mv 10.61542/rjch.120
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/120/140
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): The dimension of equality in fundamental rights; 165-182
Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2025): La dimensión de la igualdad en los derechos fundamentales; 165-182
2961-2934
2961-2926
10.61542/rjch.v3i1
reponame:CAL-Chornancap
instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron:CAL
instname_str Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron_str CAL
institution CAL
reponame_str CAL-Chornancap
collection CAL-Chornancap
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1870083422319280128
score 13.955426
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).