The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
Descripción del Articulo
The expert report for its formal admission as evidence in the intermediate stage of the criminal proceeding, according to the rules set forth in the procedural code of 2004, does not require the verification of the epistemological quality of its instruments, methods and results, since it is only req...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
| Institución: | Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| Repositorio: | CAL-Chornancap |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/104 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Etapa intermedia Informe pericial Admisibilidad científica Fiabilidad probatoria Control estandarizado Intermediate stage Expert report Scientific admissibility Evidentiary reliability Standardized control |
| id |
CAL-RChorn_b5d1ba91457816591a085a020970e7d9 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/104 |
| network_acronym_str |
CAL-RChorn |
| network_name_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability modelEl informe pericial y su control de fiabilidad en la etapa intermedia: Un modelo de admisibilidad científicaMejia Mendo, Hector HumbertoEtapa intermediaInforme pericialAdmisibilidad científicaFiabilidad probatoriaControl estandarizadoIntermediate stageExpert reportScientific admissibilityEvidentiary reliabilityStandardized controlThe expert report for its formal admission as evidence in the intermediate stage of the criminal proceeding, according to the rules set forth in the procedural code of 2004, does not require the verification of the epistemological quality of its instruments, methods and results, since it is only required to be relevant, useful and conducive. This situation allows that even when in their elaboration they use theories contrary to those established by the scientific community, they are admitted for their performance in trial, ignoring the damage (overvaluation of scientific knowledge) that they cause in the performance of the judges at the time of resolving their cases, which potentially affect the wrong convictions or acquittals to which the judicial system is exposed. The objective of this article is limited to examine the doctrinal and theoretical possibilities for the adoption of the scientific admissibility control model of the expert reports in the intermediate stage, in which the quality and scientific reliability are analyzed for their admission, in order to obtain their proposed resolution capacity for the case; concluding in the possibility of incorporating this model to the Peruvian criminal procedural system, together with the criteria of procedural admissibility established in the norm.El informe pericial para su admisión formal como medio de prueba en la etapa intermedia del proceso penal, conforme a las reglas previstas en el código procesal del 2004, no un requisito la verificación de la calidad epistemológica de sus instrumentos, métodos y resultados, pues solo se requiere que sea pertinente, útil y conducente. Esta situación permite que aquellas aun cuando en su elaboración utilicen teorías contrarias a las establecidas por la comunidad científica, sean admitidas para su actuación en juicio, desconociéndose el perjuicio (sobrevaloración del conocimiento científico) que ocasionan en la actuación de los jueces al momento de resolver sus casos, los cuales inciden potencialmente en las condenas o absoluciones erradas a lo que está expuesto el sistema judicial. El objetivo de este artículo se circunscribe en examinar las posibilidades doctrinarias y teóricas para la adopción del modelo de control de admisibilidad científica de los informes periciales en la etapa intermedia, en la que se analice para su admisión la calidad y fiabilidad científica, a fin de obtener su capacidad resolutiva propuesta para el caso; concluyéndose en la posibilidad de incorporar este modelo al sistema procesal penal peruano, aunado a los criterios de admisibilidad procesal establecidos en la norma.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2024-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/10410.61542/rjch.104Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Contemporary Perspectives on Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law: Challenges and Challenges; 67-90Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2024): Perspectivas Contemporáneas del Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal: Retos y Desafíos; 67-902961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v2i2reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104/106https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104/122https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1042025-07-14T10:16:21Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model El informe pericial y su control de fiabilidad en la etapa intermedia: Un modelo de admisibilidad científica |
| title |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model |
| spellingShingle |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto Etapa intermedia Informe pericial Admisibilidad científica Fiabilidad probatoria Control estandarizado Intermediate stage Expert report Scientific admissibility Evidentiary reliability Standardized control |
| title_short |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model |
| title_full |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model |
| title_fullStr |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model |
| title_sort |
The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto |
| author |
Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto |
| author_facet |
Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Etapa intermedia Informe pericial Admisibilidad científica Fiabilidad probatoria Control estandarizado Intermediate stage Expert report Scientific admissibility Evidentiary reliability Standardized control |
| topic |
Etapa intermedia Informe pericial Admisibilidad científica Fiabilidad probatoria Control estandarizado Intermediate stage Expert report Scientific admissibility Evidentiary reliability Standardized control |
| description |
The expert report for its formal admission as evidence in the intermediate stage of the criminal proceeding, according to the rules set forth in the procedural code of 2004, does not require the verification of the epistemological quality of its instruments, methods and results, since it is only required to be relevant, useful and conducive. This situation allows that even when in their elaboration they use theories contrary to those established by the scientific community, they are admitted for their performance in trial, ignoring the damage (overvaluation of scientific knowledge) that they cause in the performance of the judges at the time of resolving their cases, which potentially affect the wrong convictions or acquittals to which the judicial system is exposed. The objective of this article is limited to examine the doctrinal and theoretical possibilities for the adoption of the scientific admissibility control model of the expert reports in the intermediate stage, in which the quality and scientific reliability are analyzed for their admission, in order to obtain their proposed resolution capacity for the case; concluding in the possibility of incorporating this model to the Peruvian criminal procedural system, together with the criteria of procedural admissibility established in the norm. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-18 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104 10.61542/rjch.104 |
| url |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.61542/rjch.104 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104/106 https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104/122 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Contemporary Perspectives on Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law: Challenges and Challenges; 67-90 Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2024): Perspectivas Contemporáneas del Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal: Retos y Desafíos; 67-90 2961-2934 2961-2926 10.61542/rjch.v2i2 reponame:CAL-Chornancap instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque instacron:CAL |
| instname_str |
Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| instacron_str |
CAL |
| institution |
CAL |
| reponame_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| collection |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1870083421777166336 |
| score |
13.922664 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).