The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model

Descripción del Articulo

The expert report for its formal admission as evidence in the intermediate stage of the criminal proceeding, according to the rules set forth in the procedural code of 2004, does not require the verification of the epistemological quality of its instruments, methods and results, since it is only req...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
Repositorio:CAL-Chornancap
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/104
Enlace del recurso:https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Etapa intermedia
Informe pericial
Admisibilidad científica
Fiabilidad probatoria
Control estandarizado
Intermediate stage
Expert report
Scientific admissibility
Evidentiary reliability
Standardized control
id CAL-RChorn_b5d1ba91457816591a085a020970e7d9
oai_identifier_str oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/104
network_acronym_str CAL-RChorn
network_name_str CAL-Chornancap
repository_id_str
spelling The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability modelEl informe pericial y su control de fiabilidad en la etapa intermedia: Un modelo de admisibilidad científicaMejia Mendo, Hector HumbertoEtapa intermediaInforme pericialAdmisibilidad científicaFiabilidad probatoriaControl estandarizadoIntermediate stageExpert reportScientific admissibilityEvidentiary reliabilityStandardized controlThe expert report for its formal admission as evidence in the intermediate stage of the criminal proceeding, according to the rules set forth in the procedural code of 2004, does not require the verification of the epistemological quality of its instruments, methods and results, since it is only required to be relevant, useful and conducive. This situation allows that even when in their elaboration they use theories contrary to those established by the scientific community, they are admitted for their performance in trial, ignoring the damage (overvaluation of scientific knowledge) that they cause in the performance of the judges at the time of resolving their cases, which potentially affect the wrong convictions or acquittals to which the judicial system is exposed. The objective of this article is limited to examine the doctrinal and theoretical possibilities for the adoption of the scientific admissibility control model of the expert reports in the intermediate stage, in which the quality and scientific reliability are analyzed for their admission, in order to obtain their proposed resolution capacity for the case; concluding in the possibility of incorporating this model to the Peruvian criminal procedural system, together with the criteria of procedural admissibility established in the norm.El informe pericial para su admisión formal como medio de prueba en la etapa intermedia del proceso penal, conforme a las reglas previstas en el código procesal del 2004, no un requisito la verificación de la calidad epistemológica de sus instrumentos, métodos y resultados, pues solo se requiere que sea pertinente, útil y conducente. Esta situación permite que aquellas aun cuando en su elaboración utilicen teorías contrarias a las establecidas por la comunidad científica, sean admitidas para su actuación en juicio, desconociéndose el perjuicio (sobrevaloración del conocimiento científico) que ocasionan en la actuación de los jueces al momento de resolver sus casos, los cuales inciden potencialmente en las condenas o absoluciones erradas a lo que está expuesto el sistema judicial. El objetivo de este artículo se circunscribe en examinar las posibilidades doctrinarias y teóricas para la adopción del modelo de control de admisibilidad científica de los informes periciales en la etapa intermedia, en la que se analice para su admisión la calidad y fiabilidad científica, a fin de obtener su capacidad resolutiva propuesta para el caso; concluyéndose en la posibilidad de incorporar este modelo al sistema procesal penal peruano, aunado a los criterios de admisibilidad procesal establecidos en la norma.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2024-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/10410.61542/rjch.104Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Contemporary Perspectives on Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law: Challenges and Challenges; 67-90Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2024): Perspectivas Contemporáneas del Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal: Retos y Desafíos; 67-902961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v2i2reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104/106https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104/122https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1042025-07-14T10:16:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
El informe pericial y su control de fiabilidad en la etapa intermedia: Un modelo de admisibilidad científica
title The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
spellingShingle The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto
Etapa intermedia
Informe pericial
Admisibilidad científica
Fiabilidad probatoria
Control estandarizado
Intermediate stage
Expert report
Scientific admissibility
Evidentiary reliability
Standardized control
title_short The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
title_full The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
title_fullStr The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
title_full_unstemmed The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
title_sort The expert report and its reliability check at the intermediate stage: a scientific acceptability model
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto
author Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto
author_facet Mejia Mendo, Hector Humberto
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Etapa intermedia
Informe pericial
Admisibilidad científica
Fiabilidad probatoria
Control estandarizado
Intermediate stage
Expert report
Scientific admissibility
Evidentiary reliability
Standardized control
topic Etapa intermedia
Informe pericial
Admisibilidad científica
Fiabilidad probatoria
Control estandarizado
Intermediate stage
Expert report
Scientific admissibility
Evidentiary reliability
Standardized control
description The expert report for its formal admission as evidence in the intermediate stage of the criminal proceeding, according to the rules set forth in the procedural code of 2004, does not require the verification of the epistemological quality of its instruments, methods and results, since it is only required to be relevant, useful and conducive. This situation allows that even when in their elaboration they use theories contrary to those established by the scientific community, they are admitted for their performance in trial, ignoring the damage (overvaluation of scientific knowledge) that they cause in the performance of the judges at the time of resolving their cases, which potentially affect the wrong convictions or acquittals to which the judicial system is exposed. The objective of this article is limited to examine the doctrinal and theoretical possibilities for the adoption of the scientific admissibility control model of the expert reports in the intermediate stage, in which the quality and scientific reliability are analyzed for their admission, in order to obtain their proposed resolution capacity for the case; concluding in the possibility of incorporating this model to the Peruvian criminal procedural system, together with the criteria of procedural admissibility established in the norm.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104
10.61542/rjch.104
url https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104
identifier_str_mv 10.61542/rjch.104
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104/106
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/104/122
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Contemporary Perspectives on Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law: Challenges and Challenges; 67-90
Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2024): Perspectivas Contemporáneas del Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal: Retos y Desafíos; 67-90
2961-2934
2961-2926
10.61542/rjch.v2i2
reponame:CAL-Chornancap
instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron:CAL
instname_str Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron_str CAL
institution CAL
reponame_str CAL-Chornancap
collection CAL-Chornancap
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1870083421777166336
score 13.922664
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).