Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina
Descripción del Articulo
This article will present the essential features of constitutional review process in each of the following three Latin American countries: Mexico, Colombia and Argentina. The intention is to make an intersectional analysis and identify the mechanisms each country uses to resolve inconsistencies betw...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| Repositorio: | CAL-Chornancap |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/189 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/189 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Control de constitucionalidad Control concentrado Control difuso Perspectiva comparada Sistemas jurídicos latinoamericanos Constitutional review Concentrated review Diffuse review Comparative perspective Latin American legal systems |
| id |
CAL-RChorn_996672ff5a5bf54d2c6ebd959e50378d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/189 |
| network_acronym_str |
CAL-RChorn |
| network_name_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– ArgentinaModelos de justicia constitucional en perspectiva comparada: México– Colombia– ArgentinaValles Santillán, Gabriela GuadalupeControl de constitucionalidadControl concentradoControl difusoPerspectiva comparadaSistemas jurídicos latinoamericanosConstitutional reviewConcentrated reviewDiffuse reviewComparative perspectiveLatin American legal systemsThis article will present the essential features of constitutional review process in each of the following three Latin American countries: Mexico, Colombia and Argentina. The intention is to make an intersectional analysis and identify the mechanisms each country uses to resolve inconsistencies between supreme norm and secondary legislation in jurisdictional proceedings, and then to identify common solutions to practical problems that the three legal systems present in this regard. This analysis is based on the premise that the aforementioned countries share legal, political, social, and cultural elements that can be resolved through the argumentative tools of constitutional jurisdiction. The methodology used in this reflective article will be a literature review and comparative legal analysis. It is evident that the three countries have opted for constitutional control mechanisms that seek to safeguard the supremacy of the Constitution and the effective protection of rights. However, procedural complexity and the coexistence of concentrated and diffuse models mean that their models require clear strategies and an integrative vision.Este artículo expondrá las notas esenciales del control de constitucionalidad de cada uno de los siguientes tres países latinoamericanos: México, Colombia y Argentina. La intención es hacer un análisis interseccional y advertir los mecanismos que cada uno utiliza para resolver las incongruencias entre norma suprema y normativa secundaria en instancias jurisdiccionales, para luego advertir soluciones comunes a problemas prácticos que los tres sistemas jurídicos presentan al respecto, partiendo de la premisa de que los aludidos países comparten entre sí elementos jurídicos, políticos, sociales y culturales que pueden ser resueltos a través de las herramientas argumentativas de la jurisdicción constitucional. La metodología utilizada en el presente artículo de reflexión, será la revisión de literatura y el método de la comparación jurídica. Evidenciándose que los tres países han apostado por mecanismos de control constitucional que buscan salvaguardar la supremacía de la Constitución y la protección efectiva de los derechos. Sin embargo, la complejidad procedimental y la coexistencia de modelos concentrados a la par de difusos, ocasiona que sus modelos requieran de estrategias claras y de una visión integradora.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2025-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/18910.61542/rjch.189Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 57–71Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 57–712961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v3i2reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/189/153https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1892025-12-30T21:04:19Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina Modelos de justicia constitucional en perspectiva comparada: México– Colombia– Argentina |
| title |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina |
| spellingShingle |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina Valles Santillán, Gabriela Guadalupe Control de constitucionalidad Control concentrado Control difuso Perspectiva comparada Sistemas jurídicos latinoamericanos Constitutional review Concentrated review Diffuse review Comparative perspective Latin American legal systems |
| title_short |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina |
| title_full |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina |
| title_fullStr |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina |
| title_sort |
Models of constitutional justice in comparative perspective: Mexico– Colombia– Argentina |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Valles Santillán, Gabriela Guadalupe |
| author |
Valles Santillán, Gabriela Guadalupe |
| author_facet |
Valles Santillán, Gabriela Guadalupe |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Control de constitucionalidad Control concentrado Control difuso Perspectiva comparada Sistemas jurídicos latinoamericanos Constitutional review Concentrated review Diffuse review Comparative perspective Latin American legal systems |
| topic |
Control de constitucionalidad Control concentrado Control difuso Perspectiva comparada Sistemas jurídicos latinoamericanos Constitutional review Concentrated review Diffuse review Comparative perspective Latin American legal systems |
| description |
This article will present the essential features of constitutional review process in each of the following three Latin American countries: Mexico, Colombia and Argentina. The intention is to make an intersectional analysis and identify the mechanisms each country uses to resolve inconsistencies between supreme norm and secondary legislation in jurisdictional proceedings, and then to identify common solutions to practical problems that the three legal systems present in this regard. This analysis is based on the premise that the aforementioned countries share legal, political, social, and cultural elements that can be resolved through the argumentative tools of constitutional jurisdiction. The methodology used in this reflective article will be a literature review and comparative legal analysis. It is evident that the three countries have opted for constitutional control mechanisms that seek to safeguard the supremacy of the Constitution and the effective protection of rights. However, procedural complexity and the coexistence of concentrated and diffuse models mean that their models require clear strategies and an integrative vision. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-30 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/189 10.61542/rjch.189 |
| url |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/189 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.61542/rjch.189 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/189/153 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 57–71 Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 57–71 2961-2934 2961-2926 10.61542/rjch.v3i2 reponame:CAL-Chornancap instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque instacron:CAL |
| instname_str |
Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| instacron_str |
CAL |
| institution |
CAL |
| reponame_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| collection |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1870083422094884864 |
| score |
13.955426 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
