The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership

Descripción del Articulo

The article seeks to examine the interpretative scope of the unlawfulness as a sine qua non for the proceeding of the forfeiture of ownership in Peru, based on the current regulation and application that has been taking place in this matter. The unlawfulness is not limited to a criminal unlawfulness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Díaz Velaysosa, José Luis
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
Repositorio:CAL-Chornancap
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/85
Enlace del recurso:https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/85
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Ilicitud
Extinción de dominio
Derecho Penal
Interpretación constitucional
Taxatividad
Unlawfulness
Extinction of ownership
Criminal Law
Constitutional interpretation
Taxativity
id CAL-RChorn_91039e9636fbb20a4934669e1533cf6f
oai_identifier_str oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/85
network_acronym_str CAL-RChorn
network_name_str CAL-Chornancap
repository_id_str
spelling The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownershipLa ilicitud en el proceso de extinción de dominioDíaz Velaysosa, José LuisIlicitudExtinción de dominioDerecho PenalInterpretación constitucionalTaxatividadUnlawfulnessExtinction of ownershipCriminal LawConstitutional interpretationTaxativityThe article seeks to examine the interpretative scope of the unlawfulness as a sine qua non for the proceeding of the forfeiture of ownership in Peru, based on the current regulation and application that has been taking place in this matter. The unlawfulness is not limited to a criminal unlawfulness, but to any type of unlawfulness: criminal, civil, administrative, tax, etc., which entails an extremely broad unlawfulness. The objective is to determine the viability of this practice and to propose some solutions, considering the constitutional framework and the unrestricted respect for fundamental rights, particularly in the interpretation of the norm for the restriction of rights. A study is carried out focused on the procedural regulation of the extinguishment of ownership and doctrine related to unlawfulness. It is established that the interpretative scope given to unlawfulness is broad, not taking into consideration the restrictive interpretation of fundamental rights, but deliberately broadening it to extinguish the domain of those required, highlighting the constitutional interpretation as a control mechanism against the violation of rights and guaranteeing an adequate application of the norm in the process.El artículo busca examinar el alcance interpretativo de la ilicitud como presupuesto sine qua non para la procedencia de la de extinción del dominio en el Perú, ello en base a la actual regulación y aplicación que se viene dando en esta materia. La ilicitud no se circunscribe a una ilicitud penal, sino a cualquier tipo de ilicitud: penal, civil, administrativo, tributario, etcétera, lo que conlleva una ilicitud extremadamente amplia. El objetivo es determinar la viabilidad de esta práctica y proponer algunas soluciones, considerando el marco constitucional y el irrestricto respecto de los derechos fundamentales, particularmente en la interpretación de la norma para la restricción de derechos. Se lleva a cabo un estudio centrado en la regulación procesal de la extinción de dominio y doctrina vinculada a la ilicitud. Se establece que el alcance interpretativo dado a la ilicitud es lata, no tomando en consideración la interpretación restrictiva de los derechos fundamentales, sino ampliando deliberadamente para extinguir el dominio de los requeridos, se resalta la interpretación constitucional como mecanismo control frente a la vulneración de derechos y garantizar una adecuada aplicación de la norma en el procesoIlustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2024-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/8510.61542/rjch.85Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Contemporary Perspectives on Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law: Challenges and Challenges; 17-32Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2024): Perspectivas Contemporáneas del Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal: Retos y Desafíos; 17-322961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v2i2reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/85/103https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/85/110https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/852025-07-14T10:16:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
La ilicitud en el proceso de extinción de dominio
title The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
spellingShingle The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
Díaz Velaysosa, José Luis
Ilicitud
Extinción de dominio
Derecho Penal
Interpretación constitucional
Taxatividad
Unlawfulness
Extinction of ownership
Criminal Law
Constitutional interpretation
Taxativity
title_short The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
title_full The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
title_fullStr The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
title_full_unstemmed The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
title_sort The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Díaz Velaysosa, José Luis
author Díaz Velaysosa, José Luis
author_facet Díaz Velaysosa, José Luis
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ilicitud
Extinción de dominio
Derecho Penal
Interpretación constitucional
Taxatividad
Unlawfulness
Extinction of ownership
Criminal Law
Constitutional interpretation
Taxativity
topic Ilicitud
Extinción de dominio
Derecho Penal
Interpretación constitucional
Taxatividad
Unlawfulness
Extinction of ownership
Criminal Law
Constitutional interpretation
Taxativity
description The article seeks to examine the interpretative scope of the unlawfulness as a sine qua non for the proceeding of the forfeiture of ownership in Peru, based on the current regulation and application that has been taking place in this matter. The unlawfulness is not limited to a criminal unlawfulness, but to any type of unlawfulness: criminal, civil, administrative, tax, etc., which entails an extremely broad unlawfulness. The objective is to determine the viability of this practice and to propose some solutions, considering the constitutional framework and the unrestricted respect for fundamental rights, particularly in the interpretation of the norm for the restriction of rights. A study is carried out focused on the procedural regulation of the extinguishment of ownership and doctrine related to unlawfulness. It is established that the interpretative scope given to unlawfulness is broad, not taking into consideration the restrictive interpretation of fundamental rights, but deliberately broadening it to extinguish the domain of those required, highlighting the constitutional interpretation as a control mechanism against the violation of rights and guaranteeing an adequate application of the norm in the process.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/85
10.61542/rjch.85
url https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/85
identifier_str_mv 10.61542/rjch.85
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/85/103
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/85/110
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Contemporary Perspectives on Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law: Challenges and Challenges; 17-32
Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2024): Perspectivas Contemporáneas del Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal: Retos y Desafíos; 17-32
2961-2934
2961-2926
10.61542/rjch.v2i2
reponame:CAL-Chornancap
instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron:CAL
instname_str Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron_str CAL
institution CAL
reponame_str CAL-Chornancap
collection CAL-Chornancap
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1870083421504536576
score 13.956951
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).