Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law
Descripción del Articulo
The research examines the special part of criminal law, which must be understood as the area within which the legal system defines prohibited and mandated conduct ex ante and assigns its punitive consequences. At the same time, it reveals the inherent risks of interpretation replacing legislative de...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| Repositorio: | CAL-Chornancap |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/165 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/165 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Derecho penal Sanción penal Administración de justicia Legislación Imperio de la ley Criminal law Criminal penalties Legislation Administration of justice Rule of law |
| id |
CAL-RChorn_21bcf6fe5cc4051ff69946c9457ab249 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/165 |
| network_acronym_str |
CAL-RChorn |
| network_name_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal LawMás allá de la exégesis: reconstrucción dogmática del Derecho penal especialBracho-Fuenmayor, Pedro LuisDerecho penalSanción penalAdministración de justiciaLegislaciónImperio de la leyCriminal lawCriminal penaltiesLegislationAdministration of justiceRule of lawThe research examines the special part of criminal law, which must be understood as the area within which the legal system defines prohibited and mandated conduct ex ante and assigns its punitive consequences. At the same time, it reveals the inherent risks of interpretation replacing legislative determination in cases where the participation of normative elements, references, or open formulas is evident. In this sense, its purpose is to convert the judgment of criminality and its projection towards punishment into reasoning that can be controlled intersubjectively through the construction of a reconstructive sequence. To this end, a legal-dogmatic, systematic-analytical approach of a normative-interpretative nature was adopted, and the analysis was organized through steps that delimit the typical core, distinguishing descriptive and normative components, setting standards of assessment, and excluding analogy to the detriment. It is concluded that a rigorous understanding of the special part of criminal law implies the combination of interpretative limits and principles such as legality, specificity, and lex stricta, as a coherent penal closure since the penalty is derived from verifiable reconstruction and not from argumentative juxtapositions.La investigación examina la parte especial del Derecho penal, la cual ha de ser entendida como el ámbito dentro del cual el ordenamiento delimita ex ante las conductas prohibidas y ordenadas, atribuyendo su consecuencia punitiva, a su vez deja ver los riesgos inherentes a que la interpretación sustituya la determinación legislativa en los casos donde está patente la participación de los elementos normativos, remisiones o las fórmulas abiertas. En ese sentido, su propósito apunta a convertir el juicio de tipicidad y su proyección hacia la pena en un razonamiento controlable de forma intersubjetiva a través de la elaboración de una secuencia reconstructiva. Para ello, fue adoptado un enfoque jurídico-dogmático, sistemático-analítico de carácter normativo interpretativo, organizándose el análisis a través de pasos que delimitan el núcleo típico, distinguiendo componentes descriptivos y normativos, fijando estándares de valoración y excluyendo la analogía en perjuicio. Se concluye que una comprensión rigurosa de la parte especial del Derecho penal implica la conjunción de límites interpretativos y principios como el de legalidad, taxatividad y lex stricta, ello como un cierre penológico coherente toda vez que la pena se derive de la reconstrucción verificable y no de yuxtaposiciones argumentales.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2025-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/16510.61542/rjch.165Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 241–253Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 241–2532961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v3i2reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/165/164https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1652025-12-30T21:04:19Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law Más allá de la exégesis: reconstrucción dogmática del Derecho penal especial |
| title |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law |
| spellingShingle |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law Bracho-Fuenmayor, Pedro Luis Derecho penal Sanción penal Administración de justicia Legislación Imperio de la ley Criminal law Criminal penalties Legislation Administration of justice Rule of law |
| title_short |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law |
| title_full |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law |
| title_fullStr |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law |
| title_sort |
Beyond exegesis: dogmatic reconstruction of special criminal Law |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bracho-Fuenmayor, Pedro Luis |
| author |
Bracho-Fuenmayor, Pedro Luis |
| author_facet |
Bracho-Fuenmayor, Pedro Luis |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Derecho penal Sanción penal Administración de justicia Legislación Imperio de la ley Criminal law Criminal penalties Legislation Administration of justice Rule of law |
| topic |
Derecho penal Sanción penal Administración de justicia Legislación Imperio de la ley Criminal law Criminal penalties Legislation Administration of justice Rule of law |
| description |
The research examines the special part of criminal law, which must be understood as the area within which the legal system defines prohibited and mandated conduct ex ante and assigns its punitive consequences. At the same time, it reveals the inherent risks of interpretation replacing legislative determination in cases where the participation of normative elements, references, or open formulas is evident. In this sense, its purpose is to convert the judgment of criminality and its projection towards punishment into reasoning that can be controlled intersubjectively through the construction of a reconstructive sequence. To this end, a legal-dogmatic, systematic-analytical approach of a normative-interpretative nature was adopted, and the analysis was organized through steps that delimit the typical core, distinguishing descriptive and normative components, setting standards of assessment, and excluding analogy to the detriment. It is concluded that a rigorous understanding of the special part of criminal law implies the combination of interpretative limits and principles such as legality, specificity, and lex stricta, as a coherent penal closure since the penalty is derived from verifiable reconstruction and not from argumentative juxtapositions. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-30 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/165 10.61542/rjch.165 |
| url |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/165 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.61542/rjch.165 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/165/164 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 241–253 Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 241–253 2961-2934 2961-2926 10.61542/rjch.v3i2 reponame:CAL-Chornancap instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque instacron:CAL |
| instname_str |
Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| instacron_str |
CAL |
| institution |
CAL |
| reponame_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| collection |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1870083422378000384 |
| score |
13.922664 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
