Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla

Descripción del Articulo

The main objective of the current work was to evaluate the effect of irrigation water quantity (IWQ) on yield components and grape must quality of cv. Negra Criolla at Caraveli Valley, Arequipa. Results showed significant differences on grape bunch number (T3 = 57; T2 = 36), berry number per bunch (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Díaz, Keith, Arias, Javier, Rodriguez, Maura, Arata, Atilio, Aguilar, Marlene
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Repositorio:Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/1176
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1176
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:cultivar Negra Criolla
water dosage
yield component
grape must quality
id 2411-1783_20e5a10ba3d8ac230002a526d4385611
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/1176
network_acronym_str 2411-1783
repository_id_str .
network_name_str Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria
spelling Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra CriollaEstrés hídrico versus componentes del rendimiento y calidad de mosto (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra CriollaDíaz, KeithArias, JavierRodriguez, MauraArata, AtilioAguilar, Marlenecultivar Negra Criollawater dosageyield componentgrape must qualitycultivar Negra Criollawater dosageyield componentgrape must qualityThe main objective of the current work was to evaluate the effect of irrigation water quantity (IWQ) on yield components and grape must quality of cv. Negra Criolla at Caraveli Valley, Arequipa. Results showed significant differences on grape bunch number (T3 = 57; T2 = 36), berry number per bunch (T0 = 147; T1 = 66), equatorial diameters of berries B1, B2 and B3 (T3 = 13, 14 y 14; T0 = 14, 13 y 13 mm), berry bunch weights (T3 = 10.58; T2 = 7.87 kg.cepa-1) and grape must quality such as density (T2 - T3 = 1.104; T2 = 1.097 g.L-1), pH (T0 = 3.75; T1 = 3.59), and phenol compound content a Gallic acid (T0 = 1.75; T2 - T3 = 1.66 mg.L-1). In conclusion, T3 treatment produced the higher differences, but declining pH, Brix degrees and Gallic acid values.The main objective of the current work was to evaluate the effect of irrigation water quantity (IWQ) on yield components and grape must quality of cv. Negra Criolla at Caraveli Valley, Arequipa. Results showed significant differences on grape bunch number (T3 = 57; T2 = 36), berry number per bunch (T0 = 147; T1 = 66), equatorial diameters of berries B1, B2 and B3 (T3 = 13, 14 y 14; T0 = 14, 13 y 13 mm), berry bunch weights (T3 = 10.58; T2 = 7.87 kg.cepa-1) and grape must quality such as density (T2 - T3 = 1.104; T2 = 1.097 g.L-1), pH (T0 = 3.75; T1 = 3.59), and phenol compound content a Gallic acid (T0 = 1.75; T2 - T3 = 1.66 mg.L-1). In conclusion, T3 treatment produced the higher differences, but declining pH, Brix degrees and Gallic acid values.Universidad Nacional de Trujillo2016-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/117610.17268/sci.agropecu.2016.03.15Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 7 (2016): Special Issue; 265-273Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 7 (2016): Número especial; 265-2732306-67412077-9917reponame:Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuariainstname:Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstacron:UNITRUenghttp://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1176/1114http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1176/1230Derechos de autor 2016 Scientia Agropecuariainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-01T15:35:20Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
Estrés hídrico versus componentes del rendimiento y calidad de mosto (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
title Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
spellingShingle Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
Díaz, Keith
cultivar Negra Criolla
water dosage
yield component
grape must quality
cultivar Negra Criolla
water dosage
yield component
grape must quality
title_short Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
title_full Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
title_fullStr Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
title_full_unstemmed Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
title_sort Water stress versus yield components and quality must (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Negra Criolla
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Díaz, Keith
Arias, Javier
Rodriguez, Maura
Arata, Atilio
Aguilar, Marlene
author Díaz, Keith
author_facet Díaz, Keith
Arias, Javier
Rodriguez, Maura
Arata, Atilio
Aguilar, Marlene
author_role author
author2 Arias, Javier
Rodriguez, Maura
Arata, Atilio
Aguilar, Marlene
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv cultivar Negra Criolla
water dosage
yield component
grape must quality
cultivar Negra Criolla
water dosage
yield component
grape must quality
topic cultivar Negra Criolla
water dosage
yield component
grape must quality
cultivar Negra Criolla
water dosage
yield component
grape must quality
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The main objective of the current work was to evaluate the effect of irrigation water quantity (IWQ) on yield components and grape must quality of cv. Negra Criolla at Caraveli Valley, Arequipa. Results showed significant differences on grape bunch number (T3 = 57; T2 = 36), berry number per bunch (T0 = 147; T1 = 66), equatorial diameters of berries B1, B2 and B3 (T3 = 13, 14 y 14; T0 = 14, 13 y 13 mm), berry bunch weights (T3 = 10.58; T2 = 7.87 kg.cepa-1) and grape must quality such as density (T2 - T3 = 1.104; T2 = 1.097 g.L-1), pH (T0 = 3.75; T1 = 3.59), and phenol compound content a Gallic acid (T0 = 1.75; T2 - T3 = 1.66 mg.L-1). In conclusion, T3 treatment produced the higher differences, but declining pH, Brix degrees and Gallic acid values.
The main objective of the current work was to evaluate the effect of irrigation water quantity (IWQ) on yield components and grape must quality of cv. Negra Criolla at Caraveli Valley, Arequipa. Results showed significant differences on grape bunch number (T3 = 57; T2 = 36), berry number per bunch (T0 = 147; T1 = 66), equatorial diameters of berries B1, B2 and B3 (T3 = 13, 14 y 14; T0 = 14, 13 y 13 mm), berry bunch weights (T3 = 10.58; T2 = 7.87 kg.cepa-1) and grape must quality such as density (T2 - T3 = 1.104; T2 = 1.097 g.L-1), pH (T0 = 3.75; T1 = 3.59), and phenol compound content a Gallic acid (T0 = 1.75; T2 - T3 = 1.66 mg.L-1). In conclusion, T3 treatment produced the higher differences, but declining pH, Brix degrees and Gallic acid values.
description The main objective of the current work was to evaluate the effect of irrigation water quantity (IWQ) on yield components and grape must quality of cv. Negra Criolla at Caraveli Valley, Arequipa. Results showed significant differences on grape bunch number (T3 = 57; T2 = 36), berry number per bunch (T0 = 147; T1 = 66), equatorial diameters of berries B1, B2 and B3 (T3 = 13, 14 y 14; T0 = 14, 13 y 13 mm), berry bunch weights (T3 = 10.58; T2 = 7.87 kg.cepa-1) and grape must quality such as density (T2 - T3 = 1.104; T2 = 1.097 g.L-1), pH (T0 = 3.75; T1 = 3.59), and phenol compound content a Gallic acid (T0 = 1.75; T2 - T3 = 1.66 mg.L-1). In conclusion, T3 treatment produced the higher differences, but declining pH, Brix degrees and Gallic acid values.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-13
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1176
10.17268/sci.agropecu.2016.03.15
url http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1176
identifier_str_mv 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2016.03.15
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1176/1114
http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1176/1230
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Scientia Agropecuaria
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Scientia Agropecuaria
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 7 (2016): Special Issue; 265-273
Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 7 (2016): Número especial; 265-273
2306-6741
2077-9917
reponame:Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria
instname:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
instacron:UNITRU
reponame_str Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria
collection Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
instacron_str UNITRU
institution UNITRU
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1701379322015645696
score 13.934002
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).