Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience

Descripción del Articulo

Considering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Guerra, José L.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2013
Institución:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Repositorio:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/7
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Resilience; Teacher; Education; Measurement
Resiliencia; Docente; Educación; Medición
id 2310-4635_745ef82e9a3fc0af8d3dd757dad951e4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/7
network_acronym_str 2310-4635
network_name_str Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
spelling Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher ResilienceConstruction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher ResilienceConstrucción, validez y confiabilidad de la Escala de Resiliencia DocenteGuerra, José L.Resilience; Teacher; Education; MeasurementResilience; Teacher; Education; MeasurementResiliencia; Docente; Educación; MediciónConsidering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on data from 710 public school teachers, both male and female of Callao region (Peru). The results show that 71 items concentrated around four factors: 1) significant participation, 2) prosocial behavior, 3) self-esteem and learning, and 4) perception of support. The cronbach’s alpha coefficient is of .957, which shows that the resilience scale is highly reliable. The scale has been validated by 10 expert judges.Considering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on data from 710 public school teachers, both male and female of Callao region (Peru). The results show that 71 items concentrated around four factors: 1) significant participation, 2) prosocial behavior, 3) self-esteem and learning, and 4) perception of support. The cronbach’s alpha coefficient is of .957, which shows that the resilience scale is highly reliable. The scale has been validated by 10 expert judges.En la revisión que se ha realizado con relación a instrumentos para medir la resiliencia, no se ha encontrado  inguno construido específicamente desde y para docentes peruanos de las escuelas públicas de educación básica regular. Por tal motivo, uno de los objetivos del estudio que se informa fue construir un instrumento para medir la resiliencia, tomando los fundamentos teóricos expresados por Henderson y Milstein (2003). Para ello, participaron 710 docentes de ambos sexos pertenecientes a las escuelas públicas de la Región Callao. Los resultados muestran que 71 ítems se distribuyeron en cuatro factores: 1) participación significativa, 2) conducta prosocial, 3) autoestima y aprendizaje; y 4) percepción de apoyo. El coeficiente alfa de cronbach de la escala es de .957, con lo cual se demuestra que la Escala de Resiliencia Docente (ER-D) es altamente confiable. Asimismo, la escala cuenta con validez de contenido apoyada por el análisis de diez jueces expertos y con validez de constructo. Es un instrumento probado en una muestra urbana y cuenta con baremos para la población chalaca.Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.2013-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/710.20511/pyr2013.v1n1.7Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 1, Núm. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 1, Núm. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 1, Núm. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-862310-46352307-799910.20511/pyr2013.v1n1reponame:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representacionesinstname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstacron:USILspahttp://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7/121Copyright (c) 2013 Propósitos y Representacioneshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-08T18:35:31Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
Construcción, validez y confiabilidad de la Escala de Resiliencia Docente
title Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
spellingShingle Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
Guerra, José L.
Resilience; Teacher; Education; Measurement
Resilience; Teacher; Education; Measurement
Resiliencia; Docente; Educación; Medición
title_short Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
title_full Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
title_fullStr Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
title_full_unstemmed Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
title_sort Construction, validity and reliability of the Scale of Teacher Resilience
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Guerra, José L.
author Guerra, José L.
author_facet Guerra, José L.
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Resilience; Teacher; Education; Measurement
Resilience; Teacher; Education; Measurement
Resiliencia; Docente; Educación; Medición
topic Resilience; Teacher; Education; Measurement
Resilience; Teacher; Education; Measurement
Resiliencia; Docente; Educación; Medición
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Considering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on data from 710 public school teachers, both male and female of Callao region (Peru). The results show that 71 items concentrated around four factors: 1) significant participation, 2) prosocial behavior, 3) self-esteem and learning, and 4) perception of support. The cronbach’s alpha coefficient is of .957, which shows that the resilience scale is highly reliable. The scale has been validated by 10 expert judges.
Considering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on data from 710 public school teachers, both male and female of Callao region (Peru). The results show that 71 items concentrated around four factors: 1) significant participation, 2) prosocial behavior, 3) self-esteem and learning, and 4) perception of support. The cronbach’s alpha coefficient is of .957, which shows that the resilience scale is highly reliable. The scale has been validated by 10 expert judges.
En la revisión que se ha realizado con relación a instrumentos para medir la resiliencia, no se ha encontrado  inguno construido específicamente desde y para docentes peruanos de las escuelas públicas de educación básica regular. Por tal motivo, uno de los objetivos del estudio que se informa fue construir un instrumento para medir la resiliencia, tomando los fundamentos teóricos expresados por Henderson y Milstein (2003). Para ello, participaron 710 docentes de ambos sexos pertenecientes a las escuelas públicas de la Región Callao. Los resultados muestran que 71 ítems se distribuyeron en cuatro factores: 1) participación significativa, 2) conducta prosocial, 3) autoestima y aprendizaje; y 4) percepción de apoyo. El coeficiente alfa de cronbach de la escala es de .957, con lo cual se demuestra que la Escala de Resiliencia Docente (ER-D) es altamente confiable. Asimismo, la escala cuenta con validez de contenido apoyada por el análisis de diez jueces expertos y con validez de constructo. Es un instrumento probado en una muestra urbana y cuenta con baremos para la población chalaca.
description Considering that there are no instruments to measure resilience specifically designed for peruvian teachers of elementary and secondary public schools, this study aimed to build an ad hoc instrument based on the theoretical foundations expressed by Henderson and Milstein (2003). We did this based on data from 710 public school teachers, both male and female of Callao region (Peru). The results show that 71 items concentrated around four factors: 1) significant participation, 2) prosocial behavior, 3) self-esteem and learning, and 4) perception of support. The cronbach’s alpha coefficient is of .957, which shows that the resilience scale is highly reliable. The scale has been validated by 10 expert judges.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-06-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion



format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7
10.20511/pyr2013.v1n1.7
url http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7
identifier_str_mv 10.20511/pyr2013.v1n1.7
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/7/121
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Propósitos y Representaciones
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Propósitos y Representaciones
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 1, Núm. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86
Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 1, Núm. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86
Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 1, Núm. 1 (2013): Enero - Junio; 59-86
2310-4635
2307-7999
10.20511/pyr2013.v1n1
reponame:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
instname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instacron:USIL
reponame_str Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
collection Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
instname_str Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instacron_str USIL
institution USIL
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1684465319500840960
score 13.871716
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).