Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros

Descripción del Articulo

xx
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Zárate Rendón, Daniel, Rojas Flores, Julio, Segura Hong, Alan
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/12934
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/12934
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:goat
FAMACHA
nematode
anemia
caprino
nematodos
id 1609-9117_ff664922138ed44c9ab0a31f2b98cc79
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/12934
network_acronym_str 1609-9117
repository_id_str .
network_name_str Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
spelling Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos LecherosValidation of the FAMACHA© method for selective anthelmintic treatment in dairy goat herdsZárate Rendón, DanielRojas Flores, JulioSegura Hong, AlangoatFAMACHAnematodeanemiacaprinoFAMACHAnematodosanemiaxxA study in goats was carried out in the central coast of Peru to validate the FAMACHA© method for selective anthelmintic treatment in dairy goat herds. Blood and fecal samples were taken from 120 adult goats in five dairy goat farms. The micro haematocrit and the McMaster techniques plus faecal culture were used to evaluate the haematocrit, faecal nematode egg count (EPG) and to identify major nematode species, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients were obtained. Two FAMACHA© criteria were used to identify animals that require anthelmintic treatment: 1: score 3, 4 or 5; 2: score 4 or 5, with <20% haematocrit in both cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were assessed. Bunostomum sp and Haemonchus contortus were identified. Correlations between FAMACHA score, haematocrit and EPG were highly significant (p<0.001). False negatives were not found and the false positive rate was 67.5 and 46.7% for criteria 1 and 2 respectively. The true positive percentage was of 23.3% for both criteria, but the true negatives increased from 9.1 to 30%. The sensitivity of FAMACHA was 100% and the specificity was 12% for criterion 1 and 39.2% for criterion 2. The predictive positive value was 25.7 and 33.3% for criteria 1 and 2 respectively, while the negative predictive value was 100% for both criteria.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2017-05-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1293410.15381/rivep.v28i1.12934Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol 28 No 1 (2017); 150-159Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 Núm. 1 (2017); 150-1591682-34191609-9117reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perúinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/12934/11709Derechos de autor 2017 Daniel Zárate Rendón, Julio Rojas Flores, Alan Segura Honghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-01T18:08:25Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros
Validation of the FAMACHA© method for selective anthelmintic treatment in dairy goat herds
title Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros
spellingShingle Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros
Zárate Rendón, Daniel
goat
FAMACHA
nematode
anemia
caprino
FAMACHA
nematodos
anemia
title_short Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros
title_full Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros
title_fullStr Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros
title_full_unstemmed Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros
title_sort Validación del Método FAMACHA© para Dosificación Antihelmíntica Selectiva en Rebaños Caprinos Lecheros
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zárate Rendón, Daniel
Rojas Flores, Julio
Segura Hong, Alan
author Zárate Rendón, Daniel
author_facet Zárate Rendón, Daniel
Rojas Flores, Julio
Segura Hong, Alan
author_role author
author2 Rojas Flores, Julio
Segura Hong, Alan
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv goat
FAMACHA
nematode
anemia
caprino
FAMACHA
nematodos
anemia
topic goat
FAMACHA
nematode
anemia
caprino
FAMACHA
nematodos
anemia
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv xx
A study in goats was carried out in the central coast of Peru to validate the FAMACHA© method for selective anthelmintic treatment in dairy goat herds. Blood and fecal samples were taken from 120 adult goats in five dairy goat farms. The micro haematocrit and the McMaster techniques plus faecal culture were used to evaluate the haematocrit, faecal nematode egg count (EPG) and to identify major nematode species, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients were obtained. Two FAMACHA© criteria were used to identify animals that require anthelmintic treatment: 1: score 3, 4 or 5; 2: score 4 or 5, with <20% haematocrit in both cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were assessed. Bunostomum sp and Haemonchus contortus were identified. Correlations between FAMACHA score, haematocrit and EPG were highly significant (p<0.001). False negatives were not found and the false positive rate was 67.5 and 46.7% for criteria 1 and 2 respectively. The true positive percentage was of 23.3% for both criteria, but the true negatives increased from 9.1 to 30%. The sensitivity of FAMACHA was 100% and the specificity was 12% for criterion 1 and 39.2% for criterion 2. The predictive positive value was 25.7 and 33.3% for criteria 1 and 2 respectively, while the negative predictive value was 100% for both criteria.
description xx
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/12934
10.15381/rivep.v28i1.12934
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/12934
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v28i1.12934
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/12934/11709
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Daniel Zárate Rendón, Julio Rojas Flores, Alan Segura Hong
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Daniel Zárate Rendón, Julio Rojas Flores, Alan Segura Hong
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol 28 No 1 (2017); 150-159
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 Núm. 1 (2017); 150-159
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
reponame_str Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
collection Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1701389172960395264
score 13.872424
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).