Post-vaccine humoral immunity status of canines and felines in a focus of canine rabies of wild origin in a Colombian region

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of this study was to determine the post-vaccine response of canines and felines of the municipality of San Sebastián de Mariquita, Colombia, which presented in 2014 a fatal case of canine rabies due to atypical bat variant. A cross-sectional and non-experimental sampling by convenience was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Sánchez Bonilla, María del Pilar, Gutiérrez Murillo, Norma Patricia, Díaz Sánchez, Oscar Alejandro, Meriño, Samir Enrique, Álvarez Rosario, Alexander, Borrás, Luz Elena, Peña, Sandra
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17822
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17822
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:vaccination
rabies virus
immune response
sheltered animals
Colombia
vacunación
virus de la rabia
respuesta inmune
centros de rescate
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this study was to determine the post-vaccine response of canines and felines of the municipality of San Sebastián de Mariquita, Colombia, which presented in 2014 a fatal case of canine rabies due to atypical bat variant. A cross-sectional and non-experimental sampling by convenience was carried out on 130 canines and 38 felines from the rural and urban area of ​​the municipality. Blood samples were taken. The anti-rabies antibody titration was done using the ELISA kit (Platelia Rabies II Kit Ad Usum Veterinarium) approved by the OIE for the detection and titration of IgG antibodies against the glycoprotein of the virus. The classification categories (protection status) were established as Protected (> 0.5 IU/ml), Insufficient protection (>0.1 - <0.5 IU/ml) and Unprotected (<0.1 IU/ml). Results showed that 40% (52) of the canines obtained titles corresponding to the protected category, 59% (77) to the insufficient protection category and 1% (1) to the unprotected category. The felines presented a similar percentage distribution among the categories: protected 34% (13), insufficient protection 32% (12) and unprotected 34% (13).
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).