Thinking style in students of fifth year of secondary from different socioeconomic levels of the city of Lima
Descripción del Articulo
We performed a comparative descriptive study aimed to explore differences in thinking styles in a sample of adolescent students in fifth year of secondary education in Metropolitan Lima from different socioeconomic levels. The instruments used for the study were the questionnaire Sternberg’s Thinkin...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2010 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigación en Psicología |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/3735 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/3735 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | thinking style socioeconomic status adolescents estilo de pensamiento nivel socioeconómico adolescentes |
Sumario: | We performed a comparative descriptive study aimed to explore differences in thinking styles in a sample of adolescent students in fifth year of secondary education in Metropolitan Lima from different socioeconomic levels. The instruments used for the study were the questionnaire Sternberg’s Thinking Style - Wagner Short Form, and the Socioeconomic Scale. The results show that thinking styles are rated as legislative, external and liberal, while less valued styles are style oligarchic, internal and the conservatives. Differences were found between students of different socioeconomic levels in terms of thinking styles legislative, executive, monarchist, anarchist, hierarchical, oligarchic, global, local, internal, external, liberal and conservative. Likewise, in the gender comparison, significant differences were found between men and women in styles legislative, executive, judicial, monarchist, hierarchy, local, external, liberal and conservative. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).