Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital

Descripción del Articulo

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is calculated by the endogenous creatinine clearance (DCE) in 24-hour urine, with limited collection and difficulties for patients. There are formulas proposed to estimate renal function. Objective. To use the Cockcroft-Gaul formula of glomerular filtration and to co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Golac Malca, Mario, Sandoval Vegas, Miguel, Morales del Pino, Jimmy
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/12413
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/12413
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Cockcroft-Gault Formula
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Pregnant Women
Creatinine Clearance
Renal Function.
Fórmula Cockcroft–Gault
Filtración Glomerular
Gestante
Depuración de Creatinina
Función Renal.
id REVUNMSM_f1a51c1aa61e8c85f3a3de452683911e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/12413
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital
Comparación entre la depuración de creatinina en orina de 24 horas y la fórmula de Cockcroft – Gault para estimar el filtrado glomerular en mujeres gestantes atendidas en un hospital de Lima
title Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital
spellingShingle Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital
Golac Malca, Mario
Cockcroft-Gault Formula
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Pregnant Women
Creatinine Clearance
Renal Function.
Fórmula Cockcroft–Gault
Filtración Glomerular
Gestante
Depuración de Creatinina
Función Renal.
title_short Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital
title_full Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital
title_fullStr Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital
title_full_unstemmed Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital
title_sort Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospital
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Golac Malca, Mario
Sandoval Vegas, Miguel
Morales del Pino, Jimmy
author Golac Malca, Mario
author_facet Golac Malca, Mario
Sandoval Vegas, Miguel
Morales del Pino, Jimmy
author_role author
author2 Sandoval Vegas, Miguel
Morales del Pino, Jimmy
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cockcroft-Gault Formula
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Pregnant Women
Creatinine Clearance
Renal Function.
Fórmula Cockcroft–Gault
Filtración Glomerular
Gestante
Depuración de Creatinina
Función Renal.
topic Cockcroft-Gault Formula
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Pregnant Women
Creatinine Clearance
Renal Function.
Fórmula Cockcroft–Gault
Filtración Glomerular
Gestante
Depuración de Creatinina
Función Renal.
description Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is calculated by the endogenous creatinine clearance (DCE) in 24-hour urine, with limited collection and difficulties for patients. There are formulas proposed to estimate renal function. Objective. To use the Cockcroft-Gaul formula of glomerular filtration and to compare it with the chemical colorimetric method in pregnant women. Design. Observational, correlational, prospective and transversal study. Setting. Central Laboratory, Sergio Bernales National Hospital, Lima, Peru. Participants. Pregnant women. Methods. Using prior informed consent blood samples and 24-hour urine of 92 pregnant women between November 2015 and January 2016 were processed. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare the DCE results obtained with the Cockcroft- Gault formula and the serum-24 hours urine. Results. The sample had a normal distribution analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov estimator. The average DCE in 24 hours urine was 73.65 ± 19.85 mL /min, and that obtained by the Cockcroft-Gault formula was 99.82 ± 18.75 mL/min, with t test significant difference in related samples (p <0.000); the correlation between these laboratory methods was low (r = 0.561) in all pregnant women and by trimesters, showing lack of correlation with the coefficient of the Lin correlation-matching (ccc) (p <0.01). Sensitivity (S) was 0.50, specificity (Sp) 0.591, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.212 and negative predictive value (NPV) 0.881. Conclusions. The DCE obtained by Cockcroft-Gault with the DCE serum-24 hours urine in pregnant women had low correlation (r = [0.4 to 0.67]) with low levels of S, Sp, PPV and NPV, so it is not recommended for use in pregnant women.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/12413
10.15381/anales.v77i3.12413
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/12413
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/anales.v77i3.12413
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/12413/11260
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Mario Golac Malca, Miguel Sandoval Vegas, Jimmy Morales del Pino
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Mario Golac Malca, Miguel Sandoval Vegas, Jimmy Morales del Pino
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 77 No. 3 (2016); 257-262
Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 77 Núm. 3 (2016); 257-262
1609-9419
1025-5583
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238256015572992
spelling Comparing creatinine clearance in 24 hour urine and Cockcroft-Gault formula to determine glomerular filtration rate in pregnant women attending a Lima hospitalComparación entre la depuración de creatinina en orina de 24 horas y la fórmula de Cockcroft – Gault para estimar el filtrado glomerular en mujeres gestantes atendidas en un hospital de LimaGolac Malca, MarioSandoval Vegas, MiguelMorales del Pino, JimmyCockcroft-Gault FormulaGlomerular Filtration RatePregnant WomenCreatinine ClearanceRenal Function.Fórmula Cockcroft–GaultFiltración GlomerularGestanteDepuración de CreatininaFunción Renal.Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is calculated by the endogenous creatinine clearance (DCE) in 24-hour urine, with limited collection and difficulties for patients. There are formulas proposed to estimate renal function. Objective. To use the Cockcroft-Gaul formula of glomerular filtration and to compare it with the chemical colorimetric method in pregnant women. Design. Observational, correlational, prospective and transversal study. Setting. Central Laboratory, Sergio Bernales National Hospital, Lima, Peru. Participants. Pregnant women. Methods. Using prior informed consent blood samples and 24-hour urine of 92 pregnant women between November 2015 and January 2016 were processed. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare the DCE results obtained with the Cockcroft- Gault formula and the serum-24 hours urine. Results. The sample had a normal distribution analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov estimator. The average DCE in 24 hours urine was 73.65 ± 19.85 mL /min, and that obtained by the Cockcroft-Gault formula was 99.82 ± 18.75 mL/min, with t test significant difference in related samples (p <0.000); the correlation between these laboratory methods was low (r = 0.561) in all pregnant women and by trimesters, showing lack of correlation with the coefficient of the Lin correlation-matching (ccc) (p <0.01). Sensitivity (S) was 0.50, specificity (Sp) 0.591, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.212 and negative predictive value (NPV) 0.881. Conclusions. The DCE obtained by Cockcroft-Gault with the DCE serum-24 hours urine in pregnant women had low correlation (r = [0.4 to 0.67]) with low levels of S, Sp, PPV and NPV, so it is not recommended for use in pregnant women.La filtración glomerular se calcula por la depuración de creatinina endógena (DCE) en orina de 24 horas, con limitaciones en su recolección y dificultades para los pacientes. Sin embargo, existen fórmulas propuestas para estimar esta función renal. Objetivo. Aplicar la fórmula Cockcroft–Gault de filtración glomerular y compararla con método químico colorimétrico en gestantes. Diseño. Estudio observacional, correlacional, prospectivo y transversal. Lugar. Laboratorio central, Hospital Nacional Sergio Bernales de Lima, Perú. Participantes. Mujeres gestantes. Métodos. Previo consentimiento informado, se procesaron muestras de sangre y orina de 24 horas de 92 gestantes, entre noviembre 2015 y enero 2016. Se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson entre los resultados DCE de la fórmula Cockcroft–Gault y la obtenida en suero-orina de 24 horas. Resultados. La muestra tuvo una distribución normal analizada por el estimador Smirnov-Kolmogorov. El promedio de la DCE en orina de 24 horas fue 73,65 ± 19,85 mL/min, la obtenida por la fórmula Cockcroft-Gault fue 99,82 ± 18,75 mL/min, con diferencia significativa a la prueba t para muestras relacionadas (p < 0,000), y la correlación entre dichos métodos de laboratorio fue baja (r=0,561) en todas las gestantes y por trimestre, mostrando falta de correlación con la prueba coeficiente de correlación-concordancia de Lin (ccc) (p < 0,01). La sensibilidad (S) fue 0,50; especificidad (E) 0,591, el valor predictivo positivo (VPP) 0,212 y el negativo (VPN) 0,881. Conclusiones. La DCE obtenida por fórmula Cockcroft–Gault con la DCE suero-orina de 24 horas en gestantes tuvo baja correlación (r = ⦋0,4 a 0,67⦌), con niveles bajos de S, E VPP y VPN, por lo que no es recomendable su uso en gestantes.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana2016-10-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/1241310.15381/anales.v77i3.12413Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 77 No. 3 (2016); 257-262Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 77 Núm. 3 (2016); 257-2621609-94191025-5583reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/12413/11260Derechos de autor 2016 Mario Golac Malca, Miguel Sandoval Vegas, Jimmy Morales del Pinohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/124132016-12-23T23:00:12Z
score 13.955691
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).