Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García

Descripción del Articulo

This study analyzes the electoral debate of 2016, specifically the confrontation between the candidates Fernando Olivera and Alan García. It was decided to work with this corpus, since a contrast is evident in the pragmalinguistic strategies used by both candidates; therefore, the main objective is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Pérez Taype, Sindy
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/22259
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/22259
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:debate electoral peruano
teoría funcional
descortesía
deixis personal
Peruvian electoral debate
functional theory
discourtesy
personal deixis
id REVUNMSM_79c5ea077f56e934a70eb14eb562646b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/22259
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan GarcíaAnálisis pragmalingüístico del debate electoral peruano: El caso de Fernando Olivera y Alan GarcíaPérez Taype, SindyPérez Taype, Sindydebate electoral peruanoteoría funcionaldescortesíadeixis personalPeruvian electoral debatefunctional theorydiscourtesypersonal deixisThis study analyzes the electoral debate of 2016, specifically the confrontation between the candidates Fernando Olivera and Alan García. It was decided to work with this corpus, since a contrast is evident in the pragmalinguistic strategies used by both candidates; therefore, the main objective is to demonstrate each of these strategies. In the first part of the study, the content of the political discourse of both candidates is analyzed, for this the functional theory proposed by William Benoit (2007) is used. Based on this analysis, the second part describes the pragmalinguistic resources present in the speeches of each one of them. It is concluded that both candidates present differences in the content of their message: while Fernando Olivera’s speech has a denigrating propensity, Alan García has a propensity for silence. Likewise, the most widely used pragmalinguistic resources are verbal discourtesy and personal deixis.En el presente estudio se analiza el debate electoral del año 2016, específicamente el enfrentamiento entre los candidatos Fernando Olivera y Alan García. Se decidió trabajar con este corpus, ya que se evidencia un contraste en las estrategias pragmalingüísticas utilizadas por ambos candidatos; por lo tanto, el objetivo principal es evidenciar cada una de estas estrategias. En la primera parte del estudio se analiza el contenido del discurso político de ambos candidatos, para ello se emplea la teoría funcional propuesta por William Benoit (2007). En función de este análisis, en la segunda parte se describen los recursos pragmalingüísticos presentes en los discursos de cada uno de ellos. Se concluye que ambos candidatos presentan diferencias en el contenido de su mensaje: mientras que el discurso de Fernando Olivera tiene una propensión denigratoria, Alan García tiene una propensión al silencio. Asimismo, los recursos pragmalingüísticos más empleados son la descortesía verbal y deixis personal.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas2021-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/2225910.15381/lengsoc.v20i2.22259Lengua y Sociedad; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021); 383-404Lengua y Sociedad; v. 20 n. 2 (2021); 383-404Lengua y Sociedad; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2021); 383-4042413-26591729-972110.15381/lengsoc.v20i2reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/22259/17831Derechos de autor 2021 Sindy Pérez Taypehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/222592022-03-31T13:35:12Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García
Análisis pragmalingüístico del debate electoral peruano: El caso de Fernando Olivera y Alan García
title Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García
spellingShingle Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García
Pérez Taype, Sindy
debate electoral peruano
teoría funcional
descortesía
deixis personal
Peruvian electoral debate
functional theory
discourtesy
personal deixis
title_short Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García
title_full Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García
title_fullStr Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García
title_full_unstemmed Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García
title_sort Pragmalinguistic analysis of the peruvian electoral debate: The case of Fernando Olivera and Alan García
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pérez Taype, Sindy
Pérez Taype, Sindy
author Pérez Taype, Sindy
author_facet Pérez Taype, Sindy
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv debate electoral peruano
teoría funcional
descortesía
deixis personal
Peruvian electoral debate
functional theory
discourtesy
personal deixis
topic debate electoral peruano
teoría funcional
descortesía
deixis personal
Peruvian electoral debate
functional theory
discourtesy
personal deixis
description This study analyzes the electoral debate of 2016, specifically the confrontation between the candidates Fernando Olivera and Alan García. It was decided to work with this corpus, since a contrast is evident in the pragmalinguistic strategies used by both candidates; therefore, the main objective is to demonstrate each of these strategies. In the first part of the study, the content of the political discourse of both candidates is analyzed, for this the functional theory proposed by William Benoit (2007) is used. Based on this analysis, the second part describes the pragmalinguistic resources present in the speeches of each one of them. It is concluded that both candidates present differences in the content of their message: while Fernando Olivera’s speech has a denigrating propensity, Alan García has a propensity for silence. Likewise, the most widely used pragmalinguistic resources are verbal discourtesy and personal deixis.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-19
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/22259
10.15381/lengsoc.v20i2.22259
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/22259
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/lengsoc.v20i2.22259
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/22259/17831
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Sindy Pérez Taype
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Sindy Pérez Taype
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Lengua y Sociedad; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021); 383-404
Lengua y Sociedad; v. 20 n. 2 (2021); 383-404
Lengua y Sociedad; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2021); 383-404
2413-2659
1729-9721
10.15381/lengsoc.v20i2
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238321026236416
score 13.96776
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).