En la primera parte de este artículo se describe el régimen normativo que regula la emisión de opiniones por parte del Organismo Supervisor de las Contrataciones del Estado en el Perú. En la segunda, se recogen una serie de elementos interpretativos del carácter vinculante que el legislador nacional le ha dado a esas opiniones. La tercera hace una revisión de las características con que la doctrina define a la Función Administrativa Consultiva. Y en la cuarta, finalmente, se propone una interpretación del sentido y alcance del carácter vinculante de las opiniones, con especial énfasis en su aplicación durante las diversas etapasde la contratación pública en el Perú.

Arbitral fees are not a frequent topic of conversation among people involved in arbitration. Likewise, by connoting a more commercial than legal aspect and implying economic remuneration for a dispute resolution service, it could even be uncomfortable. Despite this, it is necessary to reflect on the proper understanding of the rules used in the ordinary course of the professional practice of arbitration; that is, the regime of arbitration fees.In this article, the author makes a synthetic review of the arbitration fee regime, supporting both on the theory and the experience of arbitration institutions and legislations, in order to put into perspective, the different options that institutions and national arbitration laws have taken on this matter.

Arbitral fees are not a frequent topic of conversation among people involved in arbitration. Likewise, by connoting a more commercial than legal aspect and implying economic remuneration for a dispute resolution service, it could even be uncomfortable. Despite this, it is necessary to reflect on the proper understanding of the rules used in the ordinary course of the professional practice of arbitration; that is, the regime of arbitration fees.In this article, the author makes a synthetic review of the arbitration fee regime, supporting both on the theory and the experience of arbitration institutions and legislations, in order to put into perspective, the different options that institutions and national arbitration laws have taken on this matter.

In the first part of this essay, the author describes the regulatory regime governing the issuance of opinions by the Supervising Agency of the Government Procurement (OSCE) in Peru. In the second, there is a series of interpretative elements of the binding nature of opinions of OSCE that were provided by the legislature and that institution. The third is a review of the doctrinarian characteristics that defined the institution of the Administrative Advisory Service. And finally, in the fourth part, the author proposes an interpretation of the meaning and scope of the binding nature of opinions of OSCE, with focus on their application across the various stages of government procurement in Peru.

In the first part of this essay, the author describes the regulatory regime governing the issuance of opinions by the Supervising Agency of the Government Procurement (OSCE) in Peru. In the second, there is a series of interpretative elements of the binding nature of opinions of OSCE that were provided by the legislature and that institution. The third is a review of the doctrinarian characteristics that defined the institution of the Administrative Advisory Service. And finally, in the fourth part, the author proposes an interpretation of the meaning and scope of the binding nature of opinions of OSCE, with focus on their application across the various stages of government procurement in Peru.

Arbitral fees are not a frequent topic of conversation among people involved in arbitration. Likewise, by connoting a more commercial than legal aspect and implying economic remuneration for a dispute resolution service, it could even be uncomfortable. Despite this, it is necessary to reflect on the proper understanding of the rules used in the ordinary course of the professional practice of arbitration; that is, the regime of arbitration fees.In this article, the author makes a synthetic review of the arbitration fee regime, supporting both on the theory and the experience of arbitration institutions and legislations, in order to put into perspective, the different options that institutions and national arbitration laws have taken on this matter.