Capacidad predictiva de las escalas de valoración en la prevención de ulceras por presión en adultos.

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To systematize the available evidence on the predictive capacity of the valuation scales in the prevention of pressure ulcers in adults Material and method: Systematic observational and retrospective review, which synthesizes the results of multiple primary investigations. Essentials of e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Barrientos Sulca, Sara, Oblitas Guerrero, Susan Miriam
Formato: tesis de grado
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener
Repositorio:UWIENER-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.uwiener.edu.pe:20.500.13053/2628
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/2628
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Braden
Capacidad predictiva
Escalas
Valoración
Pacientes
Ulceras por presión
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To systematize the available evidence on the predictive capacity of the valuation scales in the prevention of pressure ulcers in adults Material and method: Systematic observational and retrospective review, which synthesizes the results of multiple primary investigations. Essentials of evidence-based nursing for its rigorous methodology, identify relevant studies to answer specific clinical practice questions, search I consider full-text articles, and selected articles had a critical reading, using the grade system to assign the recommendation force. Results: In the definitive selection of articles of predictive capacity of assessment scales in the prevention of pressure ulcers in adults was the scale Braden had sensitivity: 41-100%, specificity: 21-92%, positive predictive value: 19-31 %, negative predictive value: 90-97%. Conclusions: 100% (13) of articles determined the predictive capacity of the valuation scales in the prevention of pressure ulcers in adults based on specificity, sensitivity, predictive value. Having the highest predictive capacity the Braden scale followed by Waterlow, ENMIA and Norton.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).